Enhancing Machine Learning Skills Among Undergraduates Through Project -Based Learning: A Mixed Method Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v39i4/26108Keywords:
Machine Learning, Project Based Learning, Engineering Education, Mixed MethodsAbstract
Preparing engineering graduates with practical machine learning skills is crucial in the current era of artificial intelligence. To enhance practical machine learning skills among electronics engineering students, Project -Based Learning (PBL) pedagogy was implemented. To evaluate the effectiveness of the PBL pedagogy, the proposed study investigated the outcomes and experiences of the stakeholders. The study focused on two research questions “What is the impact of transitioning from traditional approach to PBL approach on Machine Learning skills among undergraduate engineering students?” and “What are the perceived benefits and challenges of implementing Project -Based Learning (PBL) in a machine learning course, as experienced by both undergraduate engineering students and faculty?” In the study participants were purposely sampled and twelve students participated in the Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and three faculty participated in the semi -structured interview. The data from FGD and semi -structured interview was used to arrive at the perceived benefits and challenges faced by the faculty and students by implementing Project -Based Learning (PBL) in a machine learning course through thematic analysis of the data. Further, to perform impact analysis, students’ scores and attendance were considered from control group and experimental group to determine the impact of PBL pedagogy. Student data from two academic years was considered to perform impact analysis. The students in the academic years without PBL as pedagogy is considered as ‘control group’ and students with PBL as pedagogy is considered as ‘experimental group’. The proposed study is an empirical and quasi-experimental study with mixed-methods design aiming at measuring the impact of PBL initiative on students and faculty. For the quantitative analysis, the data from three academic years is considered while for the qualitative analysis, data was collected through semi structured interviews from three faculty members, common across the three course deliveries were considered while six students from two academic years of PBL implementation were purposively sampled to participate in the FGD. Quantitative analysis shows that the transition from traditional mode of delivery to PBL mode of delivery helped students to improve their machine learning skills and the impact was evident through changes in the mark’s distribution range (score band range). The initiative helped the students to translate the machine learning skills into publications. The initiative resulted in 70 Scopus indexed publications and one Q1 journal publication. Qualitative analysis of data from FGDs and interviews revealed the benefits and challenges experienced by students and teachers. The analysis highlighted the importance of processes, resources, scaffolding models, and the teacher's transition from lecturer to mentor within the PBL environment. Notably, the study found that course outcomes extended beyond the immediate course, impacting students' subsequent projects and career interests.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Adams, C. (2015). Conducting semi-structured interviews. In Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 492– 505).
Adams, E. (2010). The joys and challenges of semi-structured interviewing. In Community Practitioner, 83(7), 18– 22.
Anazifa, R. D., & Djukri, D. (2017). Project-based learning and problem-based learning: Are they effective to improve student’s thinking skills? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 346–355.
Baligar, P., Kavale, S., Joshi, G., & Shettar, A. (2018, November). Engineering exploration: A collaborative experience of designing and evolving a freshman course. In 2018 World Engineering Education Forum-Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
DeFillippi, R. J. (2001). Introduction: Project-based learning, reflective practices and learning. Management learning, 32(1), 5-10.
Du, X., De Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2009). PBL–Diversity in research questions and methodologies. In Research on PBL practice in engineering education (pp. 1-7). Brill.
Frank, M., Lavy, I., & Elata, D. (2003). Implementing the project-based learning approach in an academic engineering course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 273–288.
Guerra, A., Chen, J., Winther, M., Kolmos, A., & Nielsen, S. R. (2021). Educate for the future: PBL, Sustainability and Digitalisation 2021.
Helms, M. M., & Nixon, J. (2010). Exploring SWOT analysis–where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. Journal of strategy and management, 3(3), 215-251.
Hennink, M. M. (2013). Focus group discussions. Oxford University Press.
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965.
Kaushik, M. (2020). Evaluating a first-year engineering course for project based learning (PBL) essentials. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 364-369.
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving schools, 19(3), 267-277.Thomas, John W. "A review of research on project-based learning." (2000).
Larmer, J., & Mergendoller, J. R. (2010). Seven essentials for project-based learning. Educational leadership, 68(1), 34-37.
Mallibhat, K. (2024). Scaffolding Models in a Project-Based Learning Course-A Case Study. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 37.
Mallibhat, K., & Joshi, G. (2020). A systematic review on frameworks of project-based learning. In Educate for the future: PBL, sustainability and digitalisation 2020 (pp. 538–550). Aalborg University Press. https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/357965178/A AU_8th_PBL_2020_interaktiv_2.pdf
Mallibhat, K., Chikkamath, S., Tabib, R., Nirmala, S. R., & Mudenagudi, U. (2022). Project-based learning in machine learning course: experience and outcomes. In EDULEARN22 Proceedings (pp. 1545-1551). IATED.
Mallibhat, K., Humbi, N., Marebal, D., Joshi, G., & Kolhar, M. (2021, July). Project Exhibition In Engineering: A Case Study Of Design and Implementation Of Virtual Exhibition In First-Year Project-Based Learning Course. In 2021 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 416- 418). IEEE.
Mendoza, J., and K. Wagner. "Gold Standard Project Based Learning Designed as HQIM." PBL Evidence Matters, vol. 4, no. 1, Buck Institute for Education, 2025.
Morgan, A. (1983). Theoretical aspects of project-based learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 66–78.
Nandi, A., Bali, J., Kaushik, M., & Shirol, S. (2015). Industry- Institute interaction: An important step towards empowering skills of engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 103-107.
O. Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32.
Palmer, S., & Hall, W. (2011). An evaluation of a project-based learning initiative in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 357–365.
Tümen Akyıldız, S., & Ahmed, K. H. (2021). An overview of qualitative research and focus group discussion. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 7(1), 1–15.
Access to login into the old portal (Manuscript Communicator) for Peer Review-

