A Human-Centered Learning and Teaching Framework Using Generative Artificial Intelligence for Self-Regulated Learning Development in Teaching Digital Electronics Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v39is2/26040Keywords:
Digital Electronics; Engineering Education; Generative Artificial Intelligence; HDL Simulation; Human- Centered Learning; Self-Regulated Learning; VerilogAbstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in engineering education, offering rapid content generation, intelligent code assistance, and simulation support. In Digital Electronics courses, AI can accelerate circuit design workflows, enhance self-regulated learning (SRL), and support deeper engagement with domain-specific concepts. This paper presents an engineering-adapted Human-Centered Learning and Teaching Framework (HCLTF) that integrates generative AI into the learning process while preserving analytical rigor and human-centered pedagogical values. The framework aligns with SRL's forethought, performance, and self-reflection phases, embedding AI in logic design, HDL development, simulation, and optimization tasks. A case study is presented in which 187 undergraduate students across three institutions design, simulate, and optimize a 4-bit synchronous up/down counter using a combination of traditional design methods and AI-assisted support. The AI was employed for Boolean simplification verification, Verilog code scaffolding, testbench generation, and timing optimization. AI-assisted workflows reduce HDL development time by 40% compared to traditional methods. Synthesis results reveal measurable differences between manual and AI-generated designs, including a 4.2% lower Fmax, 20% higher LUT usage, and a 9.5% increase in dynamic power prior to student-led optimization. Quantitative and qualitative findings indicate improvements in students’ Boolean reasoning, debugging proficiency, and reflective judgment across SRL phases. The study highlights the pedagogical value of guided GenAI integration and provides a scalable model for embedding AI-supported learning within Digital Electronics and broader engineering curricula.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conduAndersen, J. P., Degn, L., Fishberg, R., Graversen, E. K., Horbach, S. P. J. M., Schmidt, E. K., Schneider, J. W., & Sørensen, M. P. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in the research process: A survey of researchers’ practices and perceptions. Technology in Society, 81, 102813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102813
Đerić, E., Frank, D., & Milković, M. (2025). Trust in generative AI tools: A comparative study of higher education students, teachers, and researchers. Information, 16(7), 622. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16070622
Peres, R., Schreier, M., Schweidel, D., & Sorescu, A. (2023). On ChatGPT and beyond: How generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 40(2), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.03.001
Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167–207. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0402_2
Amuru, D., & Abbas, Z. (2024). AI-assisted circuit design and modeling. In AI-enabled electronic circuit and system design (pp. 1–40). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-03171436-8_1
Dames, C., & Eves, M. (2025). Digital design principles and practices. Cammy Fetchens LLC.
Song, F., Xu, W., & Wang, J. (2023). Design and research of automatic generation control code for dual three-phase PMSM based on FPGA. In 2023 26th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS) (pp. 1917–1921). https://doi.org/10.1109/icems59686.2023.10345207
Tang, H. (2023). Examining self-regulated learner profiles in MOOCs: An item response theory perspective. AERA 2023. https://doi.org/10.3102/ip.23.2018003
Zhang, S., Jaldi, C. D., & Schroeder, N. L. (2025). Learning and teaching with AI in STEM education: An umbrella review. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/472nm
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
Khojah, R., Werth, A., Broadhead, K. W., et al. (2025). Integrating generative artificial intelligence tools and competencies in biomedical engineering education. Biomedical Engineering Education, 5, 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-025-00175-9
Brenner, C. A. (2022). Self-regulated learning, selfdetermination theory and teacher candidates’ development of competency-based teaching practices. Smart Learning Environments, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00184-5
Vosniadou, S., Bodner, E., Stephenson, H., et al. (2024). The promotion of self-regulated learning in the classroom: A theoretical framework and an observation study. Metacognition and Learning, 19, 381–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09374-1
Basavaiah, J., Anthony, A. A., & Patil, C. M. (2022). Transformation of engineering education in India through student-centric learning approach. Wireless Personal Communications, 124, 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09370-7
Dewan, U., Hingle, A., McDonald, N., & Johri, A. (2025). Engineering educators’ perspectives on the impact of generative AI in higher education. In 2025 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1–10). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON62633.2025.11016518
Access to login into the old portal (Manuscript Communicator) for Peer Review-

