Quantitative Learning Impact Modelling of AI-Integrated Module-Level Project-Based Learning in a Multimodal Data Omics Course: A Case Study

Authors

  • Mahadevaswamy Associate Professor, Dept. of ECE, Vidyavardhaka College of Engineering, Mysuru, Gokulam 3rd Stage, Mysuru
  • Pavithra G. Associate Professor, Department of ECE, Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering, Bengaluru
  • B. P. Pradeep Kumar Professor, Dept. of CSD, Atria Institute of Technology, Bengaluru
  • Shivashankar R. Assistant Professor, Dept. of ME, Vidyavardhaka College of Engineering, Mysuru
  • Shivaraju H. P. Associate Professor, Dept. of Environmental Sciences, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v39is2/26003

Keywords:

Assessment; Explainable AI; Multimodal Data; Project-based learning; Reproducibility; Student engagement.

Abstract

Multimodal omics courses require students to work with diverse biological data and construct reproducible analytical workflows, yet little is known about how AI-enabled tools influence learning in these settings. Prior work highlights the value of project-based learning but offers limited evidence on module-level outcomes that shape student performance. This study examines an undergraduate omics course in which six short projects-spanning genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, imaging, and clinical data-were taught using a counterbalanced Latin-square design. Each project was delivered either with and without AI-integrated scaffolds, including automated baselines, experiment tracking, containerised execution, calibration measures, and interpretability tools. Performance, concept-inventory gains, behavioural traces, and affective measures were analysed using mixed-effects modelling and mediation analysis.

Students in the AI-integrated condition showed higher technical performance, better calibration, stronger reproducibility, and good concept-learning gains. Qualitative feedback indicated that workflow tools supported iteration and clearer reasoning, though challenges with environment setup and over-reliance on automated outputs remained. The findings suggest that AI-enabled scaffolds can strengthen learning in data-intensive omics courses when paired with structured, module-level projects. The study offers a methodological template for evaluating instructional designs that combine PBL with modern analytical workflows.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-17

How to Cite

Mahadevaswamy, G., P., Pradeep Kumar, B. P., R., S., & H. P., S. (2026). Quantitative Learning Impact Modelling of AI-Integrated Module-Level Project-Based Learning in a Multimodal Data Omics Course: A Case Study. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 39(Special Issue 2), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v39is2/26003

References

Goller, C. C., Srougi, M. C., Chen, S. H., Schenkman, L. R., & Kelly, R. M. (2021). Integrating bioinformatics tools into inquiry-based molecular biology laboratory education modules. Frontiers in Education, 6, 711403.

He, X., Zhao, K., & Chu, X. (2021). AutoML: A survey of state-of-the-art. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(8), 1-36.

Lanubile, F., Martínez-Fernández, S., & Quaranta, L. (2023). Teaching MLOps in higher education through project-based learning. In 2023 IEEE/ACM ICSE-Software Engineering Education and Training (SEET) (pp. 1–8).

Luo, Y., Zhang, Q., Hu, R., Yin, H., Zhang, R., & Xie, L. (2024). Multiomics research: Principles and challenges in integrative analysis. BioDesign Research, 4, 0059.

Merkle, E. C., Fitzsimmons, E., Uanhoro, J., & Goodrich, B. (2021). Efficient Bayesian structural equation modelling in Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 100(6), 1–22.

Paulsen, L., & Lindsay, E. (2024). Learning analytics dashboards are increasingly becoming about learning and not just analytics: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(11), 14279–14308.

Poličar, P. G., Kokošar, J., Rotovnik, T., & Zupan, B. (2024). Teaching bioinformatics through the analysis of SARS-CoV-2: Project-based training for computer science students. Bioinformatics, 40(Suppl. 1), i398-i405.

Saint, J., Fan, Y., Gašević, D., & Pardo, A. (2022). Temporally-focused analytics of self-regulated learning: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100060.

Sauter, T., Bintener, T., Kishk, A., Presta, L., Prohaska, T., Guignard, D., Zeng, N., Cipriani, C., Arshad, S., & Pfau, T. (2022). Project-based learning course on metabolic network modelling in computational systems biology. PLOS Computational Biology, 18(1), e1009711.

Scott, I. C., Hepworth, S., Chisnall, C., & Routledge, P. (2024). Evaluating automated machine learning platforms for use in healthcare. JAMIA Open, 7(3), ooae031.

Sun, J. C.-Y., Yeh, R. C., Yu, S.-W., & Lin, C. (2023). Temporal learning analytics to explore traces of self-regulated learning in an online course. Computers & Education, 194, 104656.

Luo, Y., Zhang, Q., Hu, R., Yin, H., Zhang, R., & Xie, L. (2024). Multiomics research: Principles and challenges in integrative analysis. BioDesign Research, 4, 0059.

Most read articles by the same author(s)