IRSIEC Technique-Integral Revision, In Semester Examination and Evaluation of Content/Course

Authors

  • Ansar A. Mulla Rajarambapu Institute of Technology, Islampur, Shivaji University Kolhapur, M.S.
  • Satyajit R. Patil Rajarambapu Institute of Technology, Islampur, Shivaji University Kolhapur, M.S.
  • Taufiq Mulla Ashokrao Mane Group of Institutions, Wathar, Shivaji University Kolhapur, M.S.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2019/v32i4/145519

Keywords:

IRSIEC, Active Learning, Innovative Best Practices, Teaching Learning Method.

Abstract

In this paper a new active learning method is discussed, IRSIEC - Integral Revision, In Semester Examination and Evaluation of Content/ Course. Method of revision, examination and assessment is done. This method can be implemented to any class of UG/PG programs. Group formation in class, instructions are given to the student, topic for each group is given with drawing sheets for presenting their topic on it. Monitor/Teacher observes and assesses students. Revision, examination and Assessment are done simultaneously. Implementation of this method requires less time and more student involvement is possible. Each student revises the content and is examined; he/she is given full chance to expose his/her learning skills. This technique has enhanced students learning compared to traditional way of teaching learning method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-01

How to Cite

Mulla, A. A., Patil, S. R., & Mulla, T. (2019). IRSIEC Technique-Integral Revision, In Semester Examination and Evaluation of Content/Course. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 39–45. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2019/v32i4/145519

Issue

Volume 32, Issue 4, April 2019

Section

Articles
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Nirmal Mandal (2017), “Student satisfaction – What it means to teaching and learning of undergraduate engineering unitsâ€, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, (030641901774199), (2017).

Alejandra J. Magana, Camilo Vieira, (2017), “Characterizing Engineering Learners' Preferences for Active and Passive Learning Methodsâ€, IEEE Transactions on Education , Volume: 61 Issue : 1DOI :10.1109/TE.2017.2740203

Brian E. Gravel, Eli Tucker-Raymond, Kaitlin K ohb erger and Kyle Bro wne (2017), “Navigating worlds of information: STEM literacy practices of experienced makersâ€, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10.1007/s10798-017-9422-3, (2017).

Mingxin Li and Ardeshir Faghri (2016), “Applying Problem-Oriented and Project-Based Learning in a Transportation Engineering Courseâ€, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 142, 3, (04016002), (2016).

Michael Prince (2013), “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Researchâ€, Journal of Engineering Education Pages: 223-231 2 January 2013

Clive L. Dym, Alice M. Agogino, (2013), “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learningâ€, Journal of Engineering Education, doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.

Rim Razzouk and Valerie Shute, (2012) “What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important?†Review of Educational Research, 82, 3, (330), (2012).

Chi, M. T. H. (2009). “Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities.†Topics in Cognitive Sci., 1(1), 73–105.

Godfrey, E. (2003). “A theoretical model of the engineering education culture: A tool for change.†American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Washington, DC.

Sparks, G. (1988), “Teacher attitudes towards change and subsequent improvements in classroom teaching.†J. Educ. Psychol., 80(1), 111–117.

Debra J. Mesch, (1991), “The Jigsaw Technique: A Way to Establish Individual Accountability in Group Workâ€, Journal of Management Education, Volume: 15 issue: 3, page(s): 355-358, Issue published: August 1, 1991.

Most read articles by the same author(s)