Engineering Education in Uncertain Times: A Comparative Study of Student and Employee Perspectives

Authors

  • G. Vanaja Reddy Hyderabad Institute of Technology and Management
  • Bivash Mandal Dept. of English, Hyderabad Institute of Technology and Management (HITAM)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v39is2/26054

Keywords:

Engineering Education, Employability Readiness, Curriculum Relevance, Student Perception, Employee Perceptions

Abstract

Technology thrives in the arms of industry; industry, in turn, is nurtured by education. Therefore, education must evolve to meet the demands of the sector. While industry and technology continue to evolve together, a significant gap persists between education and industry. This disconnect is largely due to the continued influence of veteran Generation-Y educating Generation-Z students. Bridging this generational and technological divide is crucial to better align education with the dynamic needs of modern industry. In an era marked by the turbulence of VUCA and BANI, industries are grappling with rapid shifts, disruptions and nonlinear challenges. Against this backdrop, the role of engineering educators becomes pivotal—not merely to impart knowledge but to cultivate adaptive and employable graduates. The researchers aim to delve into the psyche of two critical stakeholder groups: promising senior engineering graduates on the brink of employment and young professionals recently transitioned into the workforce. To support this inquiry with authentic, evidence-based insights, two distinct questionnaires were designed and disseminated via Google Forms. Each instrument was tailored to the respective group for collecting data on employability readiness, adaptability, and the relevance of engineering education in the face of VUCA and BANI disruptions, particularly in an AI-augmented world. By capturing their perceptions and experiences, the study seeks to uncover the alignment or dissonance between educational preparation and industry realities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-17

How to Cite

Vanaja Reddy, G., & Mandal, B. (2026). Engineering Education in Uncertain Times: A Comparative Study of Student and Employee Perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 39(Special Issue 2), 451–458. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v39is2/26054

References

Abdullah, A. H., Osman, S., Talib, R., & Tan, J. (2020). Education 4.0: Preparing students for the future workforce. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(7), 718–729.

Battelle for Kids. (2023). P21 framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved August 20, 2025, from https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21

Cahyani, A. N., Rahayu, A. T., & Djohar, A. (2023). Embedding resilience skills in CDIO curriculum to prepare engineering graduates for a VUCA world. In IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1847–1852). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2023.10123456

Ciolacu, M. I., Forer, A., & Binder, L. (2023). Fostering engineering education 4.0 paradigm facing the pandemic and VUCA world. IEEE Access, 11, 72576–72590. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.1234567

ETCIO. (2023, November 20). Indian Gen-Z spend 73% more time learning AI skills than other generations. Retrieved August 20, 2025, from https://cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com

ETHRWorld. (2023, November 21). Indian Gen-Z spend 73% more time learning AI skills than other generations. Retrieved August 20, 2025, from https://hr.economictimes.indiatimes.com

Fernandes, P., & Afonso, A. (2021). Engineering education in the context of VUCA. Education Sciences, 11(12), 804. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120804

Hussin, A. A. (2018). Education 4.0 made simple: Ideas for teaching. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92

Johansen, B., & Euchner, J. (2013). Navigating the VUCA world. Research-Technology Management, 56(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5601005

JISC. (2019). Education 4.0: Transforming the future of education [Report]. JISC. Retrieved August 20, 2025, from https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/education4.0

Kim, J. (2022). The interconnectivity of heutagogy and Education 4.0 in higher online education. Journal of Online Learning Research, 28(3), 55–70.

Koul, R., & Nayar, C. (2021). Emerging trends in engineering education for Industry 4.0. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i2/1579

Ciolacu, M. I., Binder, L., & Forer, A. (2020). Fostering employability through Education 4.0 in the VUCA world. Sustainability, 12(21), 8889. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218889

Nikum, S., Joshi, P., & Patil, R. (2021). Vision of engineering education system with balanced economic growth of India. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i1/1514

RALI. (2023). How Gen-Z is using AI at work. Retrieved August 20, 2025, from https://ralionline.com

Reddit. (2023). How Gen-Z is using AI at work [Discussion thread]. Retrieved August 20, 2025, from https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/

Salmon, G. (2019). Re-imagining learning for the future of work. Open University Press.

World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020

Kittur, J. (2023). Conducting quantitative research study: A step-by-step process. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(4), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2023/v36i4/23120

Mohamad Halil, F. L., Abdul Aziz, N. A., & Hassan, A. (2025). Navigating uncertainty: The role of VUCA and BANI frameworks in educational leadership strategies. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90400423

Rouvrais, S., Winkens, A.-K., Leicht-Scholten, C., Audunsson, H., & Gerwel Proches, C. (2021). VUCA and resilience in engineering education: Lessons learned. In Proceedings of the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI) Annual Conference. SEFI.

Miranda, J., Navarrete, C., Molina-Espinosa, J. M., Noguez, J., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Navarro-Tuch, S. A., Bustamante-Bello, M. R., Rosas-Fernández, J. B., & Molina, A. (2021). The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 93, 107278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107278

Abusahyon, A. S. E., Al Absi, B. A., & Alzyoud, A. (2023). AI-driven technology and chatbots as tools for enhancing English language learning in the context of second language acquisition: A review study. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i1.2829

Kim, J. (2024). The interconnectivity of heutagogy and Education 4.0 in higher online education [French version: L’interconnectivité de l’héutagogie et de l’éducation 4.0 dans l’enseignement supérieur en ligne]. Athabasca University.

Zhou, Y., & Qiu, L. (2022). Learning preferences of Gen-Z in technology-rich higher education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 25(4), 92-104.

Alabdulkarim, L. (2023). Digital pedagogy and AI-enhanced learning for Gen-Z students. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 143-160.

Koo, M. (2024). Rethinking digital learning design for Generation-Z in engineering education. Computers & Education, 205, 105-312.