Impact of Active Learning Methods on Project- Based Learning (PBL): Enhancing Student Engagement and Outcomes

Authors

  • Lavanya Nagamalla Dept. of chemistry, Hyderabad Institute of technology and Management (HITAM), Hyd., Telangana
  • Vanaja Readdy Dept. of English, Hyderabad Institute of technology and Management (HITAM), Hyd., Telangana
  • Shiva Kumar Dept. of Mathematics, Hyderabad Institute of technology and Management (HITAM), Hyd., Telangana
  • Latha Kolagani Students BTech CSM 4th Year, Hyderabad Institute of technology and Management (HITAM), Telangana
  • Gnanitha Suryadevara Students BTech CSM 4th Year, Hyderabad Institute of technology and Management (HITAM), Telangana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2025/v38is2/25005

Keywords:

Active Learning: Project-Based Learning (PBL): Student Engagement

Abstract

This study examines the impact of active learning methods. Flipped Classroom, Collaborative Learning, and Case- Based Learning on Project-Based Learning (PBL) outcomes. Using a descriptive analytical quantitative approach, the performance of fifty-six Electrical Engineering students was evaluated across three assessment stages over a 10- week period. Data analysis through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) revealed that these active learning methods significantly enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. The identified constructs demonstrated strong factor loadings in areas such as problem-solving, teamwork, and practical application. These findings suggest that integrating active learning methods into PBL effectively improves student performance and engagement, highlighting the need for further research on diverse pedagogical strategies and technological integration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-12

How to Cite

Nagamalla, L., Readdy, V., Kumar, S., Kolagani, L., & Suryadevara, G. (2025). Impact of Active Learning Methods on Project- Based Learning (PBL): Enhancing Student Engagement and Outcomes. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 38(2), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2025/v38is2/25005

Issue

Volume 38, Special Issue, ICTIEE 2025, January 2025

Section

Articles
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Bender, W. N. (2018). Project-based learning: Differentiating instruction for the 21st century. Corwin Press.

Bell, S. (2019). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 92(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2018.1538104

Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis (2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag.

Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116

Kieffer, K. M. (2019). Factor analysis in the social sciences: A primer. Routledge.

Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: A practical guide for researchers, managers, and social scientists. Sage Publications.

Seltman, H. J. (2013). Experimental design and analysis. Carnegie Mellon University. Retrieved from https://www.stat.cmu.edu/~hseltman/309/Book/309 Book.html.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.

Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10694-000.