Pedagogical Reforms in Delivery of Undergraduate Heat and Mass Transfer Course towards Enhancements in Student Learning

Authors

  • N. R. Banapurmath School of Mechanical Engineering, KLETU, Hubballi
  • P. P. Revankar School of Mechanical Engineering, KLETU, Hubballi
  • M. B. Gorawar School of Mechanical Engineering, KLETU, Hubballi
  • R. S. Hosmath School of Mechanical Engineering, KLETU, Hubballi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2017/v30i3/110529

Keywords:

Heat and Mass Transfer, Research Element, Engineering Graduate Attributes.

Abstract

The new genre learners need tech-savvy Teaching-Learning procedure to initiate dialogue between the instructor and pupils. The course at Graduate level was envisaged based on employment statistics that indicated sizable segment of graduates opting teaching profession. The need for this course was also strongly supported by potential employer expectations in new recruits to possess better professional skills of team work and communication. The reported pedagogical initiative streams a non-conventional approach in imparting concepts on essentials of engineering education at Graduate level. The ordeal aims at providing a hands-on experience on broad principles of engineering education to Graduate students from multiple disciplines in Engineering. The course delivery involved oral and written presentations using conventional modes blended with Moodle-platform. The Course delivery and Assessment strategies were meticulously executed to foster interactive learning that lead to attainment of higher levels in Graduate attributes PO3 and PO5. The pedagogical impact of the course presented in form of statistical data strongly portrayed affirmative catalysis towards improved team work culture and communication skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-01

How to Cite

Banapurmath, N. R., Revankar, P. P., Gorawar, M. B., & Hosmath, R. S. (2017). Pedagogical Reforms in Delivery of Undergraduate Heat and Mass Transfer Course towards Enhancements in Student Learning. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 137–142. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2017/v30i3/110529

Issue

Section

Articles

References

David E.Goldberg, Mark Somerville, The Making of A Whole New Engineer: Four Unexpected Lessons for Engineering Educators and Education Researchers, Journal of Engineering Education January 2015, Vol. 104, No. 1, pp. 2-6

JunaidAbdul Wahid Siddiqui,Transformation of engineering education: Taking a perspective for the challenges of change, Ph.D Thesis, ProQuest, Purdue University, 2014

Steven Randall Chesnut, Hansel Burley, Selfefficacy as a predictor of commitment to the teaching profession: A meta-analysis, Educational Research Review, Volume 15, June 2015, Pages 1-16

Katrien Vangrieken, Filip Dochy, ElisabethRaes, Eva Kyndt, Teacher collaboration:Asystematic review, Educational Research Review, Volume 15, June 2015, Pages 17-40

MargusPedaste, MarioMäeots, LeoA. Siiman, Ton de Jong, Siswa A.N. van Riesen, Ellen T. Kamp , Constantinos C. Manoli, Zacharias C. Zacharia, Eleftheria Tsourlidaki, Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle, Educational Research Review 14 (2015) 47-61

M. TariqBanday, Musavir Ahmed , Tariq R. Jan, Applications of e-Learning in engineering education: A case study, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 123 ( 2014 ) 406 - 413

Fatin Aliah Phang, Khairiyah Mohd Yusof, Taking the "Guess-work" Out of Engineering Education:Establishing the Virtuous Cycle of Research, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 102 ( 2013 ) 212 - 220

Murat Sonmez, The Role of Technology Faculties in Engineering Education, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 141 (2014 ) 35 - 44