Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Year: 2020, Volume: 34, Issue: Special Issue, Pages: 64-70

Original Article

Impact of Online Learning Readiness on Students Satisfaction in Higher Educational Institutions

Abstract

Recent pandemic has fueled the growth of online learning like never before among the students of all levels. It has opened up tremendous opportunity to evaluate teaching practices through empirical investigation. The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between the learners� readiness and their satisfaction towards online education. Online learning readiness is defined as skills needed by students to learn. It emphasises on self-learning management and understanding experiences of selflearning (Smith, 2005). Literature suggests that there are studies that explored the relationship between online learning readiness, academic motivation, perceived learning, cooperative working, achievement and continuation of education (Davis, 2006; Horzum, M. B., Kaymak, Z. D., & Gungoren, O. C.,2015). However, scholars paid less attention to the relationship between online learning readiness and student satisfaction among undergraduate engineering students. Research by Gunawardena and Duphorne (2000) has identified a direct connection between learning readiness and satisfaction of learning experiences. However, their study was on the adult who had undergone distance study through computer conferencing model. The present study considers a blended online learning model. Data were collected from 155 students who are studying an undergraduate course in Indian universities. The proposed causal relationship was examined with SmartPLS 3, as it is more suitable for the moderate sample size. The research showed a positive relationship between students� online learning readiness and satisfaction. The findings demonstrated a significant relationship between the increasing levels of online learning readiness and student satisfaction. Administrators who are at the helm of responsibility of educational institutions should provide all the required facilities for the teachers to embrace online teaching.

References

  • Ali, A., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Key Factors for Determining Student Satisfaction in Distance Learning Courses: A Study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(2), 118�134. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6047
  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital Compass Learning: Distance Education Enrollment Report 2017. Babson survey research group.
  • Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133-148.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
  • Briggs, S. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of personality, 54(1), 106-148.
  • Cave, S. L. R. (2003). The effects of strengths education on the academic motivation of first-year college students (Doctoral dissertation, Azusa Pacific University,
  • California). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3082036)
  • Chizmar, J. F., & Walbert, M. S. (1999). Web-based learning environments guided by principles of good teaching practice. Journal of Economic Education, 30(3), 248�264.
  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309�319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040 3590.7.3.309
  • Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer selfefficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189�211.
  • Davis, T. S. B. (2006). Assessing online readiness: Perceptions of distance learning stakeholders in three Oklahoma community colleges (Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University).
  • Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet Self-Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00110.x
  • Eccless, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109 132.
  • Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer?mediated conferencing environment. American journal of distance education, 11(3), 8-26.
  • Gunawardena, C. N., & Duphorne, P. L. (2000). Predictors of learner satisfaction in an academic computer conference. Distance Education, 21(1), 101�117. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791000210107
  • Gunawardena, C. N., Linder-VanBerschot, J. A., LaPointe, D. K., & Rao, L. (2010). Predictors of Learner Satisfaction and Transfer of Learning in a Corporate Online Education Program. American Journal of Distance Education, 24(4), 207�226. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2010.522919
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 207-219). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
  • Halter, M. J., Kleiner, C., & Hess, R. (2006). The experience of nursing students in an online doctoral program in nursing: A phenomenological study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43, 99-105.
  • Horzum, M. B., Kaymak, Z. D., & Gungoren, O. C. (2015). Structural equation modeling towards online learning readiness, academic motivations, and perceived learning. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(3).
  • Hung, M.-L., Chou, C., Chen, C.-H., & Own, Z.-Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080�1090.
  • Jan, S. K. (2015). The relationships between academic selfefficacy, computer self-efficacy, prior experience, and satisfaction with online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 29(1), 30�40.
  • Kock, N., & Lynn, G. (2012). Lateral Collinearity and Misleading Results in Variance-Based SEM: An Illustration and Recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546�580.
  • Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and selfregulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35�50.
  • Lim, C. K. (2001). Computer self?efficacy, academic selfconcept, and other predictors of satisfaction and future participation of adult distance learners. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 41-51.
  • Lin, B., & Hsieh, C. T. (2001). Web-based teaching and learner control: a research review. Computers & Education, 37(4), 377�386.
  • Maehr, M., & Meyer, H. (1997). Understanding motivation and schooling: Where we�ve been, where we are, and where we need to go. Educational Psychology Review, 9, 371-409.
  • McVay, M. (2000). Developing a web-based distance student orientation to enhance student success in an online bachelor�s degree completion program. Unpublished practicum report presented to the Ed.D. Program. Florida: Nova Southeastern University.
  • McVay, M. (2001). How to be a successful distance learning student: Learning on the Internet. New York: Prentice Hall.
  • Merrill, M. D. (1984). What is learner control? In R. K. Bass, & C. D. Dills (Eds.), Instructional development: The state of the art II (pp.221�242) Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Pub Co
  • Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, I. G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  • Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge.
  • Poole, D. M. (2000). Student Participation in a Discussion Oriented Online Course. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 162�177.
  • Schreiner, L. A., & Nelson, D. D. (2013). The Contribution of Student Satisfaction to Persistence. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 15(1), 73� 111. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.15.1.f
  • Shen, D., Cho, M.-H., Tsai, C.-L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 10�17.
  • Simmering, M. J., Posey, C., & Piccoli, G. (2009). Computer Self-Efficacy and Motivation to Learn in a Self Directed Online Course. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 7(1), 99�121.
  • Smith, P. J. (2005, February). Learning preferences and readiness for online learning. Educational Psychology, Vol.25, pp.3�12.
  • Roper, A. R. (2007). How students develop online learning skills. Educause Quarterly, 30(1), 62.
  • Saad�, R. G., He, X., & Kira, D. (2007). Exploring dimensions to online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1721�1739.
  • Shyu, H. Y., & Brown, S. W. (1992). Learner control versus program control in interactive videodisc instruction: What are the effects in procedural learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 19(2), 85-95.
  • Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: the role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43�50.
  • Womble, J. C. (2007). E-learning: The relationship among learner satisfaction, self-efficacy, and usefulness (Doctoral dissertation). Alliant International University, San Diego, CA.Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/119496/
  • Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155-164.
  • Yukselturk, E., & Yildirim, Z. (2008). Investigation of interaction, online support, course structure and flexibility as the contributing factors to students' satisfaction in an online certificate program. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 51-65.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.