Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Year: 2017, Volume: 30, Issue: Special Issue, Pages:

Original Article

Attendance in Class and Motivation to Study in an Engineering Course: Exploring their Associations and Gender Differences

Abstract

There is an increasing evidence for associations between students' attendance and their academic achievement in general. However, it is not clear how it is related to students' motivational behaviours such as, study planning and management, especially in the context of engineering education. This study examines this relationship on a sample of engineering students (N=98). The results showed a significant positive relationship between student attendance and study management and between study planning and study management behaviours. Significant gender differences revealed that female students reported higher levels of attendance and study management behaviours than male students. Further research is required to pursue this initial understanding of motivational orientations of engineering students by tracking their attendance and motivational behaviours over time. Limitations of the current study are discussed and recommendations for future research are presented.

References

  • Bandura, A., &Schunk, D. H.(1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal selfmotivation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 41(3), 586-598.
  • Cred�, M., Roch, G.S., &Kieszczynka, U.M. (2010). Class Attendance in College: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relationship of Class Attendance With Grades and Student Characteristics. Review Of Educational Research, Vol. 80 (2), 272-295.
  • Dhaliwal, U. (2003). Absenteeism and Under-Achievement in Final Year Medical Students.The National Medical Journal of India, 16 (1), 34 - 37.
  • Flournoy, D. J. & Hyde, R. M. (1984). The Relationship of Lecture Attendance and Course Grade for Second-Year Medical Students. Journal of Oklahoma State Medical Association, 77 (1), 20 - 22.
  • Gretchen R.C, Betsy B. R & K.Muralidharan. (2005), A Profile of the Indian Education System, New Commission on the skills of American Workshop,1-28.
  • Khan, H. U., Khattak, A. M., Mahsud, I. U., Munir, A.,Ali, S., Khan, M. H., Saleem, M. & Shah, S. H. (2003). Impact of Class Attendance upon Examination Results of Students in Basic Medical Sciences. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad, 15 (2), 56 - 58.
  • Martin, A. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77 (2), 413-440.
  • Narayanan, R., Rajasekaran, N. N., &Iyyappan, S. (2007). Do female students have higher motivation than male students in learning of English at the tertiary level? Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED496970.pdf
  • Plenty, S., &Heubeck, B. G. (2011). Mathematics motivation and engagement: an independent evaluation of a complex model with Australian rural high school students. Educational Research and Evaluation, 17 (4), 283-299.
  • Plenty, S., &Heubeck, B. G. (2013). A multidimensional analysis of changes in mathematics, motivation and engagement during high school. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 33 (1), 14-30.
  • Rath, N. & Kar, N. (2012). Attendance in Classes and Examination Outcome in Management Students: Exploring the Association. Journal of Organisation & Human Behaviour, 1 (4), 60-66.
  • Riggs, J. W. & Blanco, J. D. (1994). Is There a Relation between Student Lecture Attendance and Clinical Science Subject Examination Score? Obstetrics and Gynecology, 84 (2), 311 - 313.
  • Schunk, D.H.(1984).Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behaviour. Educational Psychologist, 19, 48-58.
  • Schunk, D.H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231.
  • Schunk, D. H. (2000). Coming to terms with motivation constructs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 116-119.
  • Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32, 195-208.
  • Van Blerkom, M. (2001).Class attendance in Undergraduate Courses. The Journal of Psychology, 126 (5), 487-494.
  • Yu KyoumKim , Galen T Trail , Marshall J Magnusen, (2013) "Transition from motivation tobehaviour: examining the moderating role of Identification (ID) on the relationship between motives and attendance". International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, Vol. 14 (3), 35 � 56.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of selfregulatedacademic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339.
  • Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51-59.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic selfregulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk& B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning anderformance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.