Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Year: 2020, Volume: 33, Issue: Special Issue, Pages: 164-169

Original Article

Effective Deployment of Outcome Based Education: Strategies Based on Motivational Models

Abstract

The very purpose of the article was to discover the effective deployment strategy for Outcome Based Education (OBE). The article addresses one of the affective domains (motivation) of Blooms Taxonomy in implementing the OBE. The Maslow's motivational model and ARCS motivational model was used to complement each other in the deployment of the outcome-based system. Two sections of a course were considered in the research design having same subject of study, syllabus and assessment methodology to compare and culminate the findings of old and new approach. Root-cause analysis was used to initiate the research whereas statistical analysis was performed to culminate the findings. The new deployment strategy based on motivational theories proved to be superior in the outcome of the course. The current research was unique and adds value to body of knowledge by paving the way forward for new opportunity for engineering education research among the academicians, researchers, and policy makers.

References

  • General Manual of Accreditation (2019), NBA. Available at http://www.nbaind.org/files/general-manual-of-accreditation.pdf (Accessed on 10 September 2019)
  • Manual for Self Study Report (2019), NAAC. Available at http://www.naac.gov.in/images/docs/Manuals/AffiliatedCollegeManual19-03-2019.pdf (Accessed on 10 September 2019)
  • Palmer, S. and Ferguson, C. (2008) Improving outcomes-based engineering education in Australia, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 14(2), 91-104.
  • Sreekanth, N. V., Arjun, C. C. and Guruprasad, K. (2015) Outcome based education: strategies and tools for Indian scenario, Journal of Engineeing Education Transformation, Special Issue, 348-352.
  • Mohammad, S., Kassim, A. and Mohd? Yusof, K. (2012) Addressing the issues and challenges in ensuring quality engineering graduates using the Outcome Based Approach (OBA): The UTM experience, ASEAN Journal of Engineering Education, 1(1), 58-64.
  • Rajaee, N. et al. (2013) Issues and Challenges in Implementing Outcome Based Education in Engineering Education, International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 1(4), 1-9.
  • Gero, A. and Abraham, G. (2016) Motivational factors for studying science and engineering in beginning students: the case of academic preparatory programmes, Global Journal of Engineering Education, 18(2), 72-76.
  • Michaela, N. (2015) Educational motivation meets Maslow: Self-actualisation as contextual driver, Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters, 5(1), 18-27.
  • Wongwiwatthananukit, S. and Popovich, N. G. (2000) Applying the ARCS model of motivational design to pharmaceutical education, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 64, 188-196.
  • Brandt, R. (1993) On Outcome-Based Education: a conversation with Bill Spady, Students at Risk, 50(4), 66-70.
  • Spady, W. G. and Aldrine, F. A. (2014) Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers, MaxCor, Diliman, Quezon.
  • Maslow, A. H. (1943) A theory of motivation, Psychological review, 50(4), 370-396.
  • Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M. and Williams, G.C. (1996) Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning, Learn. Indiv.Diff., 8(3), 165-183.
  • Gero, A. and Abraham, G. (2016) Motivational factors for studying science and engineering in beginning students: the case of academic preparatory programmes, Global Journal of Engineering Education, 18(2), 72-76.
  • Hira, A. (2015) An Ontological Approach towards the next Generation Engineer. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 28(2-3), 179-184.
  • Keller, J. M. (2010) Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS model approach, Springer, NY.
  • A?iksoy, G. and �zdaml, F. (2016) Flipped Classroom adapted to the ARCS Model of Motivation and applied to a Physics Course, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6), 1589-1603.
  • Hung-Chang, L. and Ya-huei, W. (2008) Applying the ARCS Motivation Model in Technological and Vocational Education, Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 1(2), 53-58.
  • Arora A. S. and Sharma, A. (2019) Integrating the ARCS Model with Instruction for Enhanced Learning, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 32(3), 31-35.
  • Atel, C. M. and Chauhan, D. M. (2017) Motivation Based Engineering Education - A Case Study at RK University, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Special Issue.
  • Prybutok, V. R. and Ramasesh, R. (2005) An actionresearch based instrument for monitoring continuous quality improvement, European Journal of Operational Research, 166(2), 293-309.
  • Schein, E.H. (2008) Clinical inquiry/research, The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Avison, D., Baskerville, R. and Myers, M. (2001) Controlling action research projects, Information Technology & People, 14(1), 28-45.
  • Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (2008) The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage, Los Angeles.
  • Efron, S. E. and Ravid, R. (2003) Action Research in Education: A Practical Guide, Guilford Press, New York.

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.