Analogical Pedagogy for Control Systems: A Case Study on Controllability and Observability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v39is2/26028Keywords:
Analogy-based Pedagogy, Statistical Analysis, Controllability, ObservabilityAbstract
This study investigates the effectiveness of analogy-based pedagogy in enhancing the understanding of the abstract concepts of controllability and observability in a Control Systems course. Two analogies—one based on a car driving scenario and another on the teaching–learning process—were introduced sequentially to a cohort of 120 undergraduate electrical engineering students. Performance was assessed using a structured pre-test and two post-tests following each analogy session. Statistical analysis, including paired t-tests, F-tests for variance, and ANOVA, revealed significant improvements in student scores after each analogy intervention, with stable score variability, indicating genuine comprehension gains. Qualitative feedback further supported the positive impact of the analogies on student engagement and conceptual clarity. These results demonstrate that carefully crafted analogies serve as effective instructional tools to bridge the gap between abstract theory and intuitive understanding in engineering education.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Norman S. Nise. 2000. Control Systems Engineering (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA.
Katsuhiko Ogata. 2001. Modern Control Engineering (4th ed.). Prentice Hall PTR, USA.
Rudolf Emil Kalman. 1970. Lectures on controllability and observability. No. AFOSRVA701027TR.
Luis Antonio Aguirre, L.A., 2002. Controllability and observability of linear systems: some noninvariant aspects. IEEE Transactions on Education, 38(1), pp.33-39.
Robert F. Nelson, 1975. Use of Analogy as a Learning Teaching Tool, Journal of Geography, 74:2, 83-86
Lindsey E. Richland and Nina Simms, 2015. Analogy, higher-order thinking, and education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(2), pp.177-192.
Maureen E. Gray and Keith J. Holyoak, 2021. Teaching by analogy: From theory to practice. Mind, Brain, and Education, 15(3), pp.250-263.
Dedre Gentner, 1983. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive science, 7(2), pp.155-170.
Dai, Y., Lin, Z., Liu, A., Dai, D., & Wang, W. (2023). Effect of an Analogy-Based Approach of Artificial Intelligence Pedagogy in Upper Primary Schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(8), 1695-1722
Ellul, M., & Bezzina, A. (2023). The Effectiveness of Analogy Learning as a Learning Practice Condition in Primary Physical Education. Malta Journal of Education, 4(2), 47–66.
Pitterson, N., Perova-Mello, N., Streveler, R. and Streveler, R.A., 2018. Engineering students’ use of analogies and metaphors: Implications for educators. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(1), pp.2-14.
Sancibrian, R., Gonzalez-Sarabia, E., San-José, J.T., Llata, J.R. and Larrauri, M., 2019. Design by Analogy in Engineering Education: A Method to Improve Creative Ideas. In INTED2019 Proceedings (pp. 6268-6274). IATED.
Access to login into the old portal (Manuscript Communicator) for Peer Review-

