Coupling of Active Learning Tools to Enhance Understanding of Fundamental Principles of Taylor’s Series and Generate Dynamic Class Room Environment with Healthy Social Interaction

Authors

  • Umesh Bhujakkanavar Department of Sciences and Humanities, Kasegaon Education Society’s Rajarambapu Institute of Technology, affiliated to Shivaji University, Sakharale, MS-415414
  • Sudhindra Jalwadi Department of mechanical engineering, Kasegaon Education Society’s Rajarambapu Institute of Technology, affiliated to Shivaji University, Sakharale, MS-415414
  • Sandip Patange Department of Sciences and Humanities, Kasegaon Education Society’s Rajarambapu Institute of Technology, affiliated to Shivaji University, Sakharale, MS-415414

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v39is2/26033

Keywords:

Coupled active learning tools, Think pair share, Concept mapping, Students team achievement division, Coherent-symbiotic-integration.

Abstract

Teaching in engineering education encompasses numerous curriculum factors and has become increasingly complex and challenging, particularly due to students’ short attention spans and difficulty in sustaining focus. This challenge is further intensified by the constant exposure to vast volumes of information in the digital era, making it harder to identify and retain meaningful learning content. This work proposes a systematic methodology that integrates and couples active learning tools through a coherent, symbiotic teaching–learning–evaluation process designed to foster a student-centred environment and nurture the joy of learning. The approach combines three complementary strategies—Think-Pair-Share (TPS), Concept Mapping, and Student Team Achievement Division (STAD)—and is implemented in a first-year engineering mathematics course. The lecture plan, learning activities, feedback mechanisms, and evaluation processes are developed at a micro-level to accommodate diverse learning styles and the psychological needs of contemporary learners. Quantitative and qualitative comparisons with the traditional teaching approach indicate notable improvements in self-confidence, critical thinking, innovation, and social interaction. Notably, end-semester examination scores increased by 28.49% compared to the traditional method, affirming the effectiveness of the integrated approach. Based on observations from a class of sixty students, statistical analysis performed using ANOVA software, results show that there is a positive improvement in the proposed methodology, but however reliability and consistency needs to be tested for heterogeneous range of students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-18

How to Cite

Bhujakkanavar, U., Jalwadi, S., & Patange, S. (2026). Coupling of Active Learning Tools to Enhance Understanding of Fundamental Principles of Taylor’s Series and Generate Dynamic Class Room Environment with Healthy Social Interaction. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 39(Special Issue 2), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v39is2/26033

References

Álvarez Ariza, J. (2024). Bringing Active Learning, Experimentation, and Student-Created Videos in Engineering: A Study about Teaching Electronics and Physical Computing Integrating Online and Mobile Learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(6), 1723-1749.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22673

Russo, D. (2023). Pandemic Pedagogy: Evaluating Remote Education Strategies during COVID-19. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.15847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.15847

Wang, G. G. (2004). Bringing games into the classroom in teaching quality control. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(5), 678-689.

Calafate, C. T., Cano, J. C., & Manzoni, P. (2009, July). A comprehensive methodology for concept map assessment. In 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 15-17). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICALT.2009.12

Tanujaya, B., & Mumu, J. (2019). Implementation of think-pair-share to mathematics instruction. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 13(4), 510-517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v13i4.14353

Patil, Y. M. & Kumbhar, P. D. (2021), Learning by gamification: An effective active learning tool in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34(Special Issue). DOI: 10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i0/157194 earning Recursion. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 19(1), 1–25.

Tiwow, D., Salajang, S., & Damai, W. (2020, May). The Effect of Cooperative Learning Model of STAD to the Mathematics Understanding. In 4th Asian Education Symposium (AES 2019) (pp. 279-282). Atlantis Press. DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.200513.063

Syahidi, A. A., & Asyikin, A. N. (2018, April). Applying Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) Model on Material of Basic Programme Branch Control Structure to Increase Activity and Student Result. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 336, No. 1, p. 012027). IOP Publishing. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/336/1/012027

Baroody, A. J., & Bartels, B. H. (2000). Using concept maps to link mathematical ideas. Mathematics teaching in the middle school, 5(9), 604-609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.5.9.0604

Maelasari, E. (2017, September). Effects of Cooperative Learning STAD on Mathematical Communication Ability of Elementary School Student. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 895, No. 1, p. 012090). IOP Publishing. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012090

Lee, C., Li, H.-C., & Shahrill, M. (2018). Utilising the think-pair-share technique in the learning of probability. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 2(1), 49-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v2i1.8218

Ardiyani, S. M., Gunarhadi, G., & Riyadi, R. (2019). The impact of think pair share model on mathematics learning in elementary schools. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 13(1), 93-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v13i1.8427

Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Vallejo Guevara, A., Tudón Martínez, J. C., Hernández Alcántara, D., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2019). Active learning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 13, 909-922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00557-8

Lima, R. M., Andersson, P. H., & Saalman, E. (2016). Active Learning in Engineering Education: a (re)introduction. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(1), 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1254161