Ansar A. Mulla
1*,
Satyajit R. Patil
1,
Taufiq Mulla
2
- Rajarambapu Institute of Technology, Islampur, Shivaji University Kolhapur, M.S., India
- Ashokrao Mane Group of Institutions, Wathar, Shivaji University Kolhapur, M.S., India
Abstract
In this paper a new active learning method is discussed, IRSIEC - Integral Revision, In Semester Examination and Evaluation of Content/ Course. Method of revision, examination and assessment is done. This method can be implemented to any class of UG/PG programs. Group formation in class, instructions are given to the student, topic for each group is given with drawing sheets for presenting their topic on it. Monitor/Teacher observes and assesses students. Revision, examination and Assessment are done simultaneously. Implementation of this method requires less time and more student involvement is possible. Each student revises the content and is examined; he/she is given full chance to expose his/her learning skills. This technique has enhanced students learning compared to traditional way of teaching learning method.
References
- Nirmal Mandal (2017), �Student satisfaction � What it means to teaching and learning of undergraduate engineering units�, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, (030641901774199), (2017).
- Alejandra J. Magana, Camilo Vieira, (2017), �Characterizing Engineering Learners' Preferences for Active and Passive Learning Methods�, IEEE Transactions on Education, Volume: 6 1 Issue: 1 DOI: 10.1109/TE.2017.2740203
- Brian E. Gravel, Eli Tucker-Raymond, Kaitlin Kohberge r and Kyle Browne (2017), �Navigating worlds of information: STEM literacy practices of experienced makers�, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10.1007/s10798-017-9422-3, (2017).
- Mingxin Li and Ardeshir Faghri (2016), �Applying Problem-Oriented and Project-Based Learning in a Transportation Engineering Course�, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 142, 3, (04016002), (2016).
- Michael Prince (2013), �Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research�, Journal of Engineering Education Pages: 223-231 2 January 2013
- Clive L. Dym, Alice M. Agogino, (2013), �Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning�, Journal of Engineering Education, doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.
- Rim Razzouk and Valerie Shute, (2012) �What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important?� Review of Educational Research, 82, 3, (330), (2012).
- Chi, M. T. H. (2009). �Active-constructive interactive: A conceptual framework for Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Volume 32, No. 4, April 2019, ISSN 2349-2 44 473, eISSN 2394-1707 differentiating learning activities.� Topics in Cognitive Sci., 1(1), 73�105.
- Godfrey, E. (2003). �A theoretical model of the engineering education culture: A tool for change.� American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Washington, DC.
- Sparks, G. (1988), �Teacher attitudes towards change and subsequent improvements in classroom teaching.� J. Educ. Psychol., 80(1), 111�117.
- Debra J. Mesch, (1991), �The Jigsaw Technique: A Way to Establish Individual Accountability in Group Work�, Journal of Management Education, Volume: 15 issue: 3, page(s): 355358, Issue published: August 1, 1991.
