Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Year: 2020, Volume: 34, Issue: Special Issue, Pages: 396-401

Original Article

Methodologies to attain Graduate Attributes at Class Level

Abstract

Traditional teaching methodologies cover only 4 Graduate Attributes (GAs). These are GA1, GA2, GA3 and GA4. Remaining 8 Graduate Attributes will be accomplished with the new methods. In this work, activities based on active, cooperative, inductive, project, and emotional based learning methodologies are proposed. Proposed activities are designed by considering cognitive, psychomotor and affective domains of the blooms taxonomy. These activities are implemented at class level. In detail procedure to implement these methodologies in each course is presented. Hence, each course is mapped with more number Graduate Attributes. These methodologies include activities like the interactive sessions, group based assignments, case based assignments, and mini project in every course. Graduate Attributes like modern tool usage, individual/team work, communication, ethics, project management, and lifelong learning are better mapped with these new methodologies. Further, evaluation methods also proposed in this work. Experiments are performed on two classes of 60 students each. One class is taught by traditional teaching methods. Second class is taught by the proposed methodologies at course level. Performance of students in higher order thinking and lower order thinking is also assessed. Experimental results indicate that higher order thinking among students is improved. Hence, critical thinking is improved. Further, each course is mapped to 12 Graduate Attributes. Hence, possibility of attaining more Graduate Attributes is improved. Practice of proposed methodologies at class level improves the student�s attendance.

References

  • Edward M.Glaser (2017) defining critical thinking. The international center for the assessment of higher order thinking (icat,us)/critical thinking community. https://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/definingcritical thinking/766
  • Jump up (2018) piagets stages of cognitive development. http://www.telacommunications.com/nutshell/stages.htm
  • Bloom's taxonomy of learning domains: the cognitive domain. http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html
  • Krain M. (2016) Putting the learning in case learning? The effects of case-based approaches on student knowledge, attitudes, and engagement. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 27(2), 131-153.
  • Bonney KM. (2015). Case Study Teaching Method Improves Student Performance and Perceptions of Learning Gains. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 16(1): 21-28.
  • Kevin Delaplante (2018) Critical thinker academy: learn to think like a philosopher. https://www.udemy.com/course/critical-thinkeracademy/
  • Bloom's taxonomy of learning domains: the cognitive domain. www. wlink.com/~ donclark/hrd/bloom.html
  • Bloom B.S, Enelhart M.D, Furst E.J, Hill W.H, Krathwohl D.R(1956) taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York.
  • Krathwohl David R(2002) A revision of bloom's taxonomy: an overview. Theory into practice. routledge.41(4):212-18. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2.ISSN 0040-5841.
  • International engineering alliance: rules & procedures: international educational accords, Washington accord 1989, Sydney accord 2001, Dublin accord 2002. http://www.ieagreements.org/rules-and-proceduresaug 2007.pdf
  • Kilari Veera Swamy and Ch Himabindu.(2018) Outcome Based Education for Effective Teaching and Assessment, International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education (ICTIEE AP� 18), SRM University, Amaravathi, July 15-17, 2018.

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.