Abstract
It is crucial that engineering students develop creative and critical thinking skills as part of the skill set needed to become real world problem solvers. Incorporating exercises that encourage and develop creative and critical thinking skills in students is essential for a syllabus to achieve outcomes that demonstrate adequate preparation of the student of engineering to face real world challenges. In this paper,we report on the inclusion of open ended design (OED) type projects that students work on in teams as part of the requirements for both a freshman level introduction to chemical engineering design course and for a senior level core chemical engineering course or kinetics and reactor design. The paper outlines the key components of such exercises and articulates on the specifics of how these are assigned to students, the process by which the students work in collaborative groups and teams to develop the openended solution and discourses on the rubric that students are provided so that they are aware of how the assessment and evaluation of their work will be conducted. The paper articulates on the components of the final report and presentations that the students teams are expected to develop and deliver. Finally, we discuss the student educational outcomes that are being appropriately addressed through such OED projects, and report on our experience in terms of the achievement of the highlighted outcomes by the students.
References
- Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, (ABET) Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs 2008, Engineering AccreditationCommission:Baltimore.
- Cheville, Alan, �Defining Engineering Education,� Proc.
- 121s tAme r.Soc .Engg.Educ .Ann.Conf ., Indianapolis, IN, June 2014.
- Clough,G.W.e.a.,The Engineer of 2020:Visions of Engineering in the New Century, 2004, Washington,DC:NationalAcademy Press.
- EEPUS, 1985: Committee on the Education and Utilization of the Engineer, Engineering Education and Practice in the United States: Engineering in Society, Washington, DC: NationalAcademy Press.
- Davis, M., Defining "Engineer"- How to do It, and Why it Matters. Journal of Engineering Education, 1996.85 (2).
- Fogler, H.S., Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering,
- 4thEdition, Prentice-Hall,NewYork, 2006.
- Froyd, J.E., P.C.Wankat, andK.A.q. Smith, Five Major Shifts in 100 Years of Engineering Education. Proceedings of the IEEE 2012, 100 (13): p. 1344-1360.
- Mitcham, C. and E. Schatzberg, Defining Technology and the Engineering Sciences, in Philosophy ofTechnology and Engineering Sciences, A. Meijers, Editor. 2009, Elsevier: Amsterdam.
- Walker, E.A., J.M. Pettit, and G.A. Hawkins, Goals of Engineering Education: Final Report of theGoals Committee, inEngineeringEducation, 1968. p. 367-446.
- Wickenden,W.E. and H.P. Hammond, Report of the Investigation of Engineering Education 1923-1929, 1930, Society for the Promotion of EngineeringEducation: Pittsburgh, PA.
