Kaisar Katchi
*,
Rita Das
,
Chandrashekhar Gajbhiye
- Applied Sciences and Humanities Department, Sardar Patel Institute of Technology, Bhavan's Andheri Campus, Munshi Nagar, Andheri West, Mumbai 400053, India
Abstract
This paper presents a comparative study between the results obtained by two groups of students for a problem-based subject over two different systems of learning: the traditional, classroom-based delivery, and a system coupling that with a more interactive tutorial-based approach. The results show an improvement in the grade performance with the newer, interactive approach.
References
- Spady, William G. (1994), Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers, American Association of School Administrators, 1801 North Moore Street, Arlington, VA 22209 (Stock No. 21-00488).
- Sax, C., and Fisher, D. (2001). Using qualitative action research to effect change: Implications for professional education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 71-80.
- Sagor, R. (2011). The action research guidebook: A four-stage process for educators and school teams. Corwin Press.
- Johnson, B. M. (1995). Why Conduct Action Research?. Teaching and Change, 3(1), 90-104.
- Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., and Nixon, R. (2013). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer Science & Business Media.
- NBA User Manual, http://www.nbaind.org/en/usermanual.htm
