From Passive to Participatory by Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Active Learning Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v39is2/26074Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence in Education, Active Learning Strategies, AI-Assisted Learning, Python Programming Pedagogy, Student EngagementAbstract
The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into educational practice offers unprecedented opportunities to transform classroom pedagogy from passive, lecture-centered approaches to participatory, learner-driven experiences. This study reports the design, implementation, and evaluation of an AIenabled active learning framework through a quasi-experimental study involving two matched student sections for the secondsemester B.Tech Computer Engineering course Python Programming at RK University, involving 120 students. The intervention blended AI-assisted pair programming, adaptive lowstakes quizzing with real-time feedback, AI-driven Socratic tutoring for conceptual clarity, and analytics-informed instructional adjustments, all within an explicit ethical AI use policy. A quasi-experimental design was employed, with two matched sections: an AI-Active group incorporating AI tools into active learning strategies, and a Traditional-Active group relying on established active learning methods without AI integration. Comparative analysis demonstrated that the AI-Active cohort achieved higher final exam scores (+7.8 points), improved lab task accuracy (+11 percentage points), reduced programming anxiety, and shortened time-to-solution, while also exhibiting increased engagement in formative assessments. These outcomes align with recent findings from published work indicating moderate-to-large effect sizes for AI-enhanced instruction, particularly when sustained over multiple weeks and supported by structured guidance. The study concludes that embedding AI into active learning can enhance both cognitive and affective learning outcomes in programming education, offering a scalable model for modern classrooms. Recommendations for sustaining gains, ensuring academic integrity, and scaling the approach across technical disciplines are provided. However, limited research has compared AI-enabled active learning directly with traditional active learning in large programming cohorts.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Deng, R., Benitez, J., & Chen, Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 207, 104998.
Kestin, G., Morris, S., & Zhang, W. (2025). AI tutors versus traditional active learning: Comparative impacts on student achievement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 45.
Tanna, P., Lathigara, A., & Bhatt, N. (2025). Holistic Learning in Engineering: A NEP-Driven Exploration of Emerging Technologies for Education Transformation. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 39(2), 66–79.
Wang, J., & Fan, W. (2025). ChatGPT in education: A metaanalysis of its effects on learning outcomes. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100198.
Yan, Y. M., Zhou, P., & Huang, X. (2025). Large language model-based collaborative programming: Effects on cognitive load, computational thinking, and self efficacy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(2), 255–272.
Yilmaz, R., Altun, E., & Koseoglu, P. (2024). Real-time AI feedback versus expert human feedback: An experimental study in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 812–828.
Tanna, P., Bhatt, N., & Patel, S. (2020). An Innovative Approach for Learning and Evaluating ProgrammingOriented Courses. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 62–74.
Fan, G., Li, X., & Wang, H. (2025). AI-assisted pair programming: Impacts on student performance, motivation, and anxiety. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 25(2), 12–29.
Fletcher, J. D., & Kulik, J. A. (2017). The effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 108–144.
Chavan, P. C. (2024). Storytelling with Data as an Active Learning Tool for C++ Programming. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations.
Lathigara, A., Tanna, P., & Bhatt, N. (2021). Activity Based Programming Learning. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 499–506.
López-Fernández, D., Torres-Martín, C., & García-Sánchez, M. (2025). Enhancing database learning through ChatGPT: Student performance and perceptions. Education and Information Technologies, 30(4), 5678–5697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12678-1
Reddy, S. N. (2024). Investigating the Transformative Effects of Active Learning Approaches on BTech Students. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations.
Rajesh, K. (2024). AI-Enhanced Personalized Learning Practices in Higher Education. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations.
Belim, P., Bhatt, N., Lathigara, A., & Durani, H. (2025). Enhancing Level of Pedagogy for Engineering Students Through Generative AI. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations.
Access to login into the old portal (Manuscript Communicator) for Peer Review-

