Advancing SDG 4 through Blended Learning: Faculty Engagement and Management Insights from a Diffusion of Innovations Lens

Authors

  • Arya Kumar School of Economics and Commerce, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology, (KIIT) Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, India, and INTI International University
  • Anuj Kumar Rushford Business School, Switzerland, INTI International University
  • Devi Debyani Faculty of Art, Culture and Indic studies, Sri Sri University
  • Asokan Vasudevan Professor, Faculty of Business and Communications, Inti International University, Malaysia, Research Fellow, Wekerle Business School, Budapest, Jázmin u. 10, 1083 Hungary
  • Subhashree Nanda Independent Researcher, Odisha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2025/v39is1/25134

Keywords:

Blended Learning; Higher Education; Artificial Intelligence in Education; Diffusion of Innovations; SDG 4.

Abstract

In recent years, we have witnessed blended learning emerge as a defining feature of higher education, aiming to enrich student engagement and outcomes. Our universities have increasingly embraced this approach across various levels. While its adoption has grown, we observed that understanding of blended learning often remains limited to isolated, small-scale practices. In our research, we applied Rogers' diffusion of innovations theory to explore how blended education is implemented in academic environments. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 26 faculty members and seven university leaders involved in a university-wide blended education programme. Alongside thematic pattern matching, we analysed institutional documents to gain deeper insight. Our findings indicate that, although some faculty expressed reluctance, the transition was facilitated by a robust strategy, substantial infrastructural investments, and sustained institutional support. However, applying Rogers' model revealed a critical omission—the 'matching' stage was missing. This absence highlights the failure to include lecturers in key decisions and to integrate their feedback into the design process. Moreover, we recognise that AIpowered platforms—ranging from adaptive learning systems to intelligent content delivery—now play an essential role in enhancing blended learning. Yet, without inclusive design, even AI cannot bridge the disconnect between pedagogy and practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-10

How to Cite

Kumar, A., Kumar, A., Debyani, D., Vasudevan, A., & Nanda, S. (2025). Advancing SDG 4 through Blended Learning: Faculty Engagement and Management Insights from a Diffusion of Innovations Lens. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 39(is1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2025/v39is1/25134

Issue

Section

Research Article

References

Adekola, J., Dale, V.H. and Gardiner, K. (2017) Development of an institutional framework to guide transitions into enhanced blended learning in higher education. Research in Learning Technology. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v25.1973.

Ali, R. (2022) Implementation of blended learning in higher education: a case study of adoption and diffusion.

Anthony, B., Jr. (2021) Institutional factors for faculty members’ implementation of blended learning in higher education. Education + Training. 63: 701–719

Antwi-Boampong, A. (2020) Towards a faculty blended learning adoption model for higher education. Education and Information Technologies 25(3): 1639– 1662

Antwi-Boampong, A. and Anthony Jnr, B. (2021) Towards an institutional blended learning adoption model for higher education institutions. Technology, Knowledge and Learning 27(3): 765–78

Bokolo, A., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A.F.M., Danakorn Nincarean, A., Eh Phon, L., et al. (2020) A managerial perspective on institutions’ administration readiness to diffuse blended learn- ing in higher education: concept and evidence. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 52(1): 37–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.16 75203

Chikasanda, V.K.M., Otrel-Cass, K., Williams, J. and Jones, A. (2013) Enhancing teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge and practices: a professional development model for technology teachers in Malawi. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 23(3): 597–622

Chiu, T.K.F. (2017) Introducing electronic textbooks as daily-use technology in schools: a top-down adoption process. British Journal of Educational Technology 48(2): 524–537

Crawford, R. (2017) Rethinking teaching and learning pedagogy for education in the twenty-first century: blended learning in music education. Music Education Research 19(2): 195–213

Creswell, J.W. (2014) Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluation quantitaive and quali- tative research, 4th edn, London: Pearson Education Limited.

Dall’Alba, G. and Sandberg, J. (2006) Unveiling professional development: a critical review of stage mod- els. Review of Educational Research 76(3): 383–412. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076003383

Dumford, A.D. and Miller, A.L. (2018) Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 30(3): 452–465

Dziuban, C., Graham, C.R., Moskal, P.D., Norberg, A. and Sicilia, N. (2018) Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 15(3): 1–16

Eckhardt, A., Laumer, S. and Weitzel, T. (2009) Who influences whom? Analyzing workplace referents’ social influence on IT adoption and non-adoption. Journal of Information Technology 24(1): 11–24

Ertmer, P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E. and Sendurur, P. (2012) Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: a critical relationship. Computers & Education 59(2): 423–435

Fan, S., Trimble, A., Kember, D., Muir, T., Douglas, T., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) Supporting engagement and retention of online and blended-learning students: a qualitative study from an Australian University. The Australian Educational Researcher 51(1): 403–421

Ferri, F., Grifoni, P. and Guzzo, T. (2020) Online learning and emergency remote teaching: opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies 10(4): 86

Frei-Landau, R., Muchnik-Rozanov, Y. and Avidov-Ungar, O. (2022) Using Rogers’ diffusion of inno- vation theory to conceptualize the mobile-learning adoption process in teacher education in the COVID-19 era. Education and Information Technologies 27: 12811– 12838

Gornitzka, A. and Larsen, I.M. (2004) Towards professionalisation? Restructuring of administrative work force in universities. Higher Education: the International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning 47(4): 455–471

Graf-Vlachy, L., Buhtz, K. and König, A. (2018) Social influence in technology adoption: taking stock and moving forward. Management Review Quarterly 68(1): 37– 76

Graham, C.R., Woodfield, W. and Harrison, J.B. (2013) A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education 18: 4–14

Grgurovic, M. (2014) An application of the diffusion of innovations theory to the investigation of blended language learning. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 8(2): 155–170

Hamari, J. and Nousiainen, T. (2015) ‘Why do teachers use game-based learning technologies? The role of individual and institutional ICT readiness’, in IEEE, pp. 682–691.

Hameed, M.A. and Arachchilage, N.A.G. (2021) The role of self-efficacy on the adoption of information systems security innovations: a meta-analysis assessment. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 25: 911–925

Harriger, D., Lu, W., McKyer, E.L.J., Pruitt, B.E. and Goodson, P. (2014) Assessment of school wellness policies implementation by benchmarking against diffusion of innovation framework. The Journal of School Health 84(4): 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12145

Hill, J. and Smith, K. (2023) Visions of blended learning: identifying the challenges and opportunities in shaping institutional approaches to blended learning in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 32(3): 289–303

Hoover, E. and Harder, M.K. (2015) What lies beneath the surface? The hidden complexities of organizational change for sustainability in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production 106: 175–188

Howard, S.K. (2013) Risk-aversion: understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 22(3): 357–372

Jennifer, P.L. (2003) A review and critique of rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory as it applies to organ- izations. Organization Development Journal 21(4): 50

Keis, O., Grab, C., Schneider, A. and Öchsner, W. (2017) Online or face-to-face instruction? A qualitative study on the electrocardiogram course at the University of Ulm to examine why students choose a particular format. BMC Medical Education 17(1): 1–8

Latip, A.E., Suparman, A. and Naridoh. (2020) Innovation process in an organization about thematic learning in primary schools: an innovation diffusion research. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation 24(20): 2906–2913

Li, S. and Wang, W. (2022) Effect of blended learning on student performance in K-12 settings: a meta- analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 38: 1254– 1272

Liang, J.-C., Chai, C.S., Koh, J.H.L., Yang, C.-J. and Tsai, C.-C. (2013) Surveying inservice preschool teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 29: 40. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.299

Liu, S.-H. (2011) Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers and Education 56(4): 1012–1022

Martin-Sardesai, A., Irvine, H., Tooley, S. and Guthrie, J. (2017) Organizational change in an Australian university: responses to a research assessment exercise. The British Accounting Review 49(4): 399–412

McCarthy, S. and Palmer, E. (2023) Defining an effective approach to blended learning in higher education: a systematic review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 39(2): 98–114

Mestan, K. (2019) Create a fine blend: an examination of institutional transition to blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 35(1): 70–84

Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340–363

Müller, C. and Mildenberger, T. (2021) Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: a systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Edu Research Review 34: 100394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394

Narayanan, M. and Ordynans, J.G. (2021) Meaning making and self-efficacy: teacher reflections through COVID-19. The Teacher Educator 57(1): 26–44

Olelewe, C.J. and Agomuo, E.E. (2016) Effects of B-learning and F2F learning environments on students’ achievement in QBASIC programming. Computers & Education 103: 76–86

Owston, R., York, D. and Murtha, S. (2013) Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. The Internet and Higher Education 18: 38–46

Ożadowicz, A. (2020) Modified blended learning in engineering higher education during the COVID-19 lockdown—Building automation courses case study. Education Sciences 10(10): 292

Philipsen, B., Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., Vanslambrouck, S. and Zhu, C. (2019) Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: a systematic meta-aggregative review. Educational Technology Research and Development 67(5): 1145–1174

Porter, W.W. and Graham, C.R. (2016) Institutional drivers and barriers to faculty adoption of blended learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology 47(4): 748–762

Posey, L. and Pintz, C. (2017) Transitioning a bachelor of science in nursing program to blended learning: successes, challenges & outcomes. Nurse Education in Practice 26: 126–133

Pulham, E., Graham, C. and Short, C. (2018) Generic vs. modality-specific competencies for K-12 online and blended teaching. Journal of Online Learning Research 4(1): 33–52

Ravenscroft, B. and Luhanga, U. (2018) Enhancing student engagement through an institutional blended learning initiative: a case study. Teaching and Learning Inquiry 6(2): 97–114. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.6.2.8

Reid, P. (2017) Supporting instructors in overcoming self-efficacy and background barriers to adoption. Education and Information Technologies 22(1): 369–382

Rogers, E.M. (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn, New York: Free Press.

Rusek, M., Stárková, D., Chytrý, V. and Bílek, M. (2017) Adoption of ICT innovations by secondary school teachers and pre-service teachers within chemistry education. Journal of Baltic Science Education 16(4): 510–523

Sánchez-Prieto, J.C., Huang, F., OlmosMigueláñez, S., García-Peñalvo, F.J. and Teo, T. (2019) Explor- ing the unknown: the effect of resistance to change and attachment on mobile adoption among secondary pre-service teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology 50(5): 2433–2449. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12822

Scherer, R., Howard, S.K., Tondeur, J. and Siddiq, F. (2021) Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching and learning in higher education: Who’s ready? Computers in Human Behavior 118: 106675

Shaikh, A. A., Kumar, A., Mishra, A., and Elahi, Y. A. (2024). A study of customer satisfaction in using banking services through Artificial Intelligence (AI) in India. Public Administration and Policy 27(2): 167-181

Short, C.R., Hanny, C., Jensen, M., Arnesen, K. and Graham, C.R. (2021) ’Competencies and practices for guiding K–12 blended teacher readiness’, in A.G. Picciano, C.D. Dziuban, C.R. Graham and P.D. Moskal (eds.) Blended Learning: Research PerspectivesNew York: Routledge, pp. 193–213.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037736-17.

Smith, K. and Hill, J. (2019) Defining the nature of blended learning through its depiction in current research. Higher Education Research & Development 38(2): 383–397

Tay, H.Y. (2016) Investigating engagement in a blended learning course. Cogent Education 3(1): 1–13

Templeton, G.F., Schmidt, M.B. and Taylor, G.S. (2009) Managing the diffusion of organizational learning behavior. Information Systems Frontiers 11(2): 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-91170

Thai, N.T.T., De Wever, B. and Valcke, M. (2017) The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education 107: 113–126

Thai, N.T.T., De Wever, B. and Valcke, M. (2020) Face-to-face, blended, flipped, or online learning environment? Impact on learning performance and student cognitions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 36(3): 397–411

Thomas, B.J., Jarrah, A.A. and Joseph, N. (2022) ’Blended learning in HEIs in the Middle East: Institu- tional framework for adoption and implementation’, in H. Magd and S.K. Kunjumuhammed (eds.) Global Perspectives on Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Higher Education Institutions IGI Global, pp. 248–268.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8085-1.ch014.

Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P.A. and Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017) Understanding the relation- ship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development 65(3): 555–575

Tornatzky, L.G., Fleischer, M. and Chakrabarti, A.K. (1990) Processes of technological innovation, Lanham: Lexington Books.

Tshabalala, M., Ndeya-Ndereya, C. and Van der Merwe, T. (2014) Implementing blended learning at a developing university: obstacles in the way. Electronic Journal of e-Learning 12(1): 101–110

Turner, K., Weinberger, M., Renfro, C., Powell, B.J., Ferreri, S., Trodgon, J.G., et al. (2021) Stages of change: moving community pharmacies from a drug dispensing to population health management model. Medical Care Research and Review 78(1): 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558719841159

Uğur, B., Akkoyunlu, B. and Kurbanoğlu, S. (2011) Students’ opinions on blended learning and its implementation in terms of their learning styles. Education and Information Technologies 16: 5–23 Wang,

Q. and Huang, C. (2018) Pedagogical, social and technical designs of a blended synchronous learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology 49(3): 451–462

Wanner, T. and Palmer, E. (2015) Personalising learning: exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers & Education 88: 354–369

Webster, A. and Gardner, J. (2019) Aligning technology and institutional readiness: the adoption of inno- vation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 31(10): 1229–1241

Xu, D., Glick, D., Rodriguez, F., Cung, B., Li, Q. and Warschauer, M. (2020) Does blended instruction enhance English language learning in developing countries? Evidence from Mexico. British Journal of Educational Technology 51(1): 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12797

Yin, R.K. (2012) Applications of case study research, 3rd edn, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Zee, M. and Koomen, H.M. (2016) Teacher selfefficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: a synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research 86(4): 981–1015

Zhai, Y., Ding, Y. and Wang, F. (2018) Measuring the diffusion of an innovation: a citation analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology 69(3): 368–379.