Empowering STEM through Pragmatic Competence: A Holistic Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v40i1/26142Keywords:
Collaboration, Communication, Engineering Education, Experiential Learning, Task-based Language Teaching, TeamworkAbstract
The paper addresses the need to integrate pragmatic competence into STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) disciplines to enhance learners’ communication skills, collaborative capabilities, and professional readiness, enabling them to face the challenges of the 21st century. The traditional STEM curricula often emphasise technical skills and subject expertise, while overlooking the nuances of contextual language use, which is essential for teamwork, cross-disciplinary collaboration, and effective dissemination of findings. Pragmatic competence equips learners with the requisite skills to collaborate, negotiate, and present ideas clearly in real-world scenarios. In this line, the paper investigates the integration of pragmatic competence into STEM curricula, highlighting its transformative potential for developing both academic and professional outcomes. The study focuses on tertiary-level learners and discusses how pragmatic competence fosters communication and collaboration through the implementation of tasks. The sample comprises first-year B.Tech students (n=62) from the Department of Instrumentation and Control Engineering, and the teacher-researcher has administered the pragmatic tasks to the students. Results from this research indicate that fostering pragmatic competence not only improves student outcomes but also nurtures innovation in STEM professionals. By bridging the gap between technical expertise and effective communication, this study advocates for a holistic STEM education framework that equips the learners to navigate the complex, communicative demands of a globalised workforce. The paper further suggests adapting and integrating pragmatic skills into STEM curricula to create experimental and experiential learning opportunities for the students.
Downloads
References
Al-Aghbari, D. (2016). Integrating pragmatic competence in teaching English to the students of medicine at Taiz University. https://dx.doi.org/10.70675/d18ed6fbz218fz4e27z9b53z0536aaa15f93
Almazova, N., & Sheredekina, O. (2022). Distance Training of Pragmatic Competence of Law Students via Legal Cases in an English for Specific Purposes Course. Education Sciences, 12(11), 819. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110819
Alpay, E., Ahearn, A.L., Graham, R. H., & Bull, A. M. J. (2008). Student enthusiasm for engineering: charting changes in student aspirations and motivation. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33 (5–6), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790802585454
Branden, K. van den (Ed.). (2006). Task-Based Language Education: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667282
De Educación, U. O. I., & Ng, S. B. (2019). Exploring STEM competences for the 21st century. MINISTERIO DE EDUCACIÓN. https://repositorio.minedu.gob.pe/handle/20.500.12799/6641
Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A Learner-centred Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733031
Hyland, K. (2019). English for Specific Purposes: Some Influences and Impacts. In: Gao, X. (eds) Second Handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_19-1
Jordà, M. P. S. (2005). Third Language Learners: Pragmatic Production and Awareness. Multilingual Matters & Channel View Publications. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.27710907
Kasper, G. (1997). Can Pragmatic Competence be Taught? Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center. https://nflrc.hawaii.edu/publications/view/NW06/
Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N. (2016). Learner–Learner interaction during collaborative pragmatic tasks: the role of cognitive and pragmatic task demands. Foreign Language Annals, 49(1), 42 57. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12180
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall
Kolb, D.A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc. (Original work published 1984)
Leaver, B. L., & Willis, J. R. (2004). Task-Based Instruction in Foreign Language Education. Georgetown University Press. https://press.georgetown.edu/Book/Task-Based-Instruction-in-Foreign-Language-Education
Marope, M., Griffin, P. & Gallagher, C. (2018). Future Competences and the Future of the Curriculum: A Global Reference for the Transformation, IBE. https://www.equitat.org/app/uploads/2025/03/book_complete_future_competences_and _the_future_of_curriculum.pdf
Ministry of Human Resource Development. (2020). National education policy 2020. Government of India. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf
Noonkong, U., Damnet, A., & Charttrakul, K. (2017). Enhancing Thai engineering students’ complaints and apologies through pragmatic consciousness-raising approach (PCR). Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(6), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.6p.92
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press.
O’Rourke, J.S. (2007). Management communication: a case-analysis approach. New York, NY: Pearson Education Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003331490
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P. (1991). ESP Today: A Practitioner’s Guide. New York: Prentice Hall.
Rontu, H. (2009). Tekniikan alan korkeakoulukoulutettujen kieli-ja viestintätaidot ja taitotarpeet työelämässä (P.L., Trans.) [The language and communications abilities and skills needs of engineering graduates in working life]. Helsinki: Helsinki University of Technology, The Language Centre.
Rowland, T. (2003). The Pragmatics of Mathematics Education: Vagueness and Pragmatic Discourse. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203487631
Staley, T., & Bairaktarova, D. (2022). Why change engineering education: pragmatic perspectives from the humanities and social sciences. 1662–1669. https://doi.org/10.5821/conference-9788412322262.1344
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.91
Vargas, H, Heradio, R., Farias, G., Lei, Z. & De La Torre, L. (2024). A Pragmatic framework for assessing learning outcomes in competency-based courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 67(2), 224-233. https://doi.org/10.1109/te.2023.3347273
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes (M. Cole, V. Jolm-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Access to login into the old portal (Manuscript Communicator) for Peer Review-
