Redesigning Assessment in Technical Education Amid Generative AI Disruption: A Call for Policy and Pedagogical Reform

Authors

  • Amitabh Verma Faculty of Business, Sohar University, Sohar, Oman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v40i1/26139

Keywords:

Generative artificial intelligence, technical education, AI in education, ChatGPT, Gemini, Educational policy.

Abstract

The rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini has introduced new complexities to academic assessment, particularly in technical education where skill-based evaluations are central. This study investigates how generative AI is impacting assessment practices in technical education institutions across the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. Employing a convergent mixed-methods approach, the research draws on survey responses from 120 students and faculty members, as well as in-depth interviews with academic staff from three GCC countries. Quantitative findings reveal a significant disparity in AI tool usage between students and faculty, with students more frequently relying on AI for academic tasks. A chi-square test confirmed that this difference is statistically significant (χ² (3, N = 120) = 11.73, p = .008). Qualitative analysis identified four key themes: rising concerns over AI-enabled academic dishonesty, perceived threats to fairness and learning outcomes, institutional policy gaps, and emerging assessment adaptations such as oral exams and reflective evaluations. This study underscores an urgent need for institutional reforms, including AI-specific academic integrity policies, faculty training, and assessment redesign. By aligning pedagogy and policy with the realities of AI-integrated learning environments, technical education institutions in the GCC can uphold academic standards while fostering ethical, future-ready learning ecosystems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, M., Ogalo, H., Sankar, J. P., & Ramayah, T. (2025). Exploring adoption of E-learning in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) education sector. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00950-2

Al-Busaidi, F. S., Al Balushi, W., Al-Salti, Z., Malik, A., Shiyyab, F. S., & Al-Okaily, M. (2024). Evaluating the students’ academic performance in the higher education sector through using social media platforms. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-04-2024-0205

Al-Mamary, Y. H. S., Siddiqui, M. A., Abdalraheem, S. G., Jazim, F., Abdulrab, M., Rashed, R. Q., Alquhaif, A. S., & Aliyu Alhaji, A. (2024). Factors impacting Saudi students’ intention to adopt learning management systems using the TPB and UTAUT integrated model. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 15(5), 1110–1141. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-04-2022-0068

Alghamdi, S. A., & Alashban, Y. (2023). Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards artificial intelligence (AI) among radiologists in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, 16(2), 100569. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2023.100569

Bower, M., Torrington, J., Lai, J. W. M., Petocz, P., & Alfano, M. (2024). How should we change teaching and assessment in response to increasingly powerful generative Artificial Intelligence? Outcomes of the ChatGPT teacher survey. Education and Information Technologies, 29(12), 15403–15439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12405-0

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Camilleri, M. A. (2024). Factors affecting performance expectancy and intentions to use ChatGPT: Using SmartPLS to advance an information technology acceptance framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, 123247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123247

Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3 Chan,

C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Corbin, T., Phillip, D., Kelli, N.-R., & Partridge, H. (2025). ‘Where’s the line? It’s an absurd line’: towards a framework for acceptable uses of AI in assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2456207

Cotton, D. R. E., Peter A., C., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Doyle, L., Easterbrook, M. J., & Harris, P. R. (2024). It’s a problem, but not mine: Exploring bias-related message acceptance among teachers. Social Psychology of Education, 27(3), 909–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09832-9

El Naggar, A., Gaad, E., & Inocencio, S. A. M. (2024). Enhancing inclusive education in the UAE: Integrating AI for diverse learning needs. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 147, 104685. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104685

Finnie-Ansley, J., Denny, P., Becker, B., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Prather, J. (2022). The Robots Are Coming: Exploring the Implications of OpenAI Codex on Introductory Programming. https://doi.org/10.1145/3511861.3511863

Giannakos, M., Roger, A., Peter, B., Mutlu, C., Yannis, D., Davinia, H.-L., Sanna, J., Manolis, M., & Rienties, B. (2024). The promise and challenges of generative AI in education. Behavior & Information Technology, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2394886

Kanbach, D. K., Heiduk, L., Blueher, G., Schreiter, M., & Lahmann, A. (2024). The GenAI is out of the bottle: generative artificial intelligence from a business model innovation perspective. Review of Managerial Science, 18(4), 1189–1220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00696-z

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Klingebiel, S., Hartmann, F. L., Madani, E., Paintner, J., Rohe, R. A., Trebs, L., & Wolk, T. (2024). Methods for Data Collection and Analysis BT - Exploring the Effectiveness of International Knowledge Cooperation: An Analysis of Selected Development Knowledge Actors (S. Klingebiel, F. L. Hartmann, E. Madani, J. Paintner, R. A. Rohe, L. Trebs, & T. Wolk (eds.); pp. 43–50). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55704-0_4

Koh, E., & and Doroudi, S. (2023). Learning, teaching, and assessment with generative artificial intelligence: towards a plateau of productivity. Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2023.2264086

Kolade, O., Owoseni, A., & Egbetokun, A. (2024). Is AI changing learning and assessment as we know it? Evidence from a ChatGPT experiment and a conceptual framework. Heliyon, 10(4), e25953. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25953

Lakshmi, A. J., Kumar, A., Kumar, M. S., Patel, S. I., Naik, S. K. L., & Ramesh, J. V. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in steering the digital transformation of collaborative technical education. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 34(2), 100467. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2023.100467

Lancaster, T., & Cotarlan, C. (2021). Contract cheating by STEM students through a file sharing website: a Covid-19 pandemic perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00070-0

Lee, D., Arnold, M., Srivastava, A., Plastow, K., Strelan, P., Ploeckl, F., Lekkas, D., & Palmer, E. (2024). The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators’ perspectives. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221

Luo (Jess), J. (2024). A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: a call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(5), 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2309963

Lye, C. Y., & Lim, L. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Tertiary Education: Assessment Redesign Principles and Considerations. In Education Sciences (Vol. 14, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060569

Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2024). A review of assessment for learning with artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(1), 100040. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100040

Mulyani, H., Mohamad Azim, I., Elvia R., S., Fitrina, K., & Arlinda, H. (2025). Transforming education: exploring the influence of generative AI on teaching performance. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2448066. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2448066

Qadir, J. (2023). Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education. 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125121

Roberts, P., & Priest, H. (2006). Reliability and validity in research. Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987), 20, 41–45. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2006.07.20.44.41.c6560

Searson, M., Langran, E., & Trumble, J. (2024). Exploring New Horizons: Generative Artificial Intelligence and Teacher Education. Published by AACE -Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

Shwedeh, F., Salloum, S., Aburayya, A., Fatin, B., Elbadawi, M., Alghurabli, Z., & Al- Dabbagh, T. (2024). AI Adoption and Educational Sustainability in Higher Education in the UAE (pp. 201–229). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52280-2_14

Smutný, P., & Schreiberova, P. (2020). Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the Facebook Messenger. Computers & Education, 151, 103862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103862

Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2024). Opportunities, challenges, and strategies for using ChatGPT in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 4, ep2401. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/14027

Stolpe, K., & Hallström, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence literacy for technology education. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100159

Su, J., & Yang, Weipeng. (2023). Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT: A Framework for Applying Generative AI in Education. ECNU Review of Education, 6(3), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231168423

Sun, J. C., & Pratt, T. L. (2024). Navigating AI Integration in Career and Technical Education: Diffusion Challenges, Opportunities, and Decisions. In Education Sciences (Vol. 14, Issue 12). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121285

Swiecki, Z., Khosravi, H., Chen, G., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Lodge, J. M., Milligan, S., Selwyn, N., & Gašević, D. (2022). Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100075. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100075

van den Berg, S., & Papadopoulos, P. M. (2024). Summative assessment with Artificial Intelligence: Qualitative analysis and comparison of technology acceptance in student and teacher populations. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2436613

Wong, W. K. O. (2024). The sudden disruptive rise of generative artificial intelligence? An evaluation of their impact on higher education and the global workplace. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(2), 100278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100278

Wood, D., & Moss, S. H. (2024). Evaluating the impact of students’ generative AI use in educational contexts. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 17(2), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-06-2024-0151

Xia, Q., Weng, X., Ouyang, F., Lin, T. J., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A scoping review on how generative artificial intelligence transforms assessment in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00468-z

Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., & Román-González, M. (2024). Generative AI and the future of higher education: a threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6

Zawacki-Richter, O., Bai, J. Y. H., Lee, K., Slagter van Tryon, P. J., & Prinsloo, P. (2024). New advances in artificial intelligence applications in higher education? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00464-3

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Verma, A. (2026). Redesigning Assessment in Technical Education Amid Generative AI Disruption: A Call for Policy and Pedagogical Reform. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 40(1), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v40i1/26139

Issue

Section

Articles