Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Year: 2020, Volume: 34, Issue: Special Issue, Pages: 365-374

Original Article

What Factors Impact Online Education? A Factor Analysis Approach

Abstract

Internet popularity is growing day by day, which directly or indirectly increases the potential for online study. Apart from this, the current era of COVID 19 has revolutionized online education to a greater extent. However, the usage of computers, software's and technological advancement has raised many questions about the effectiveness of online platforms and online study. This survey-based quantitative study aimed to investigate the factors that affect the success of the online study. A total of 690 participants have participated in the survey attending online classes from multiple institutions in India. After careful investigation, 673 participants survey that was complete in all aspects has been considered for analysis. These students were either graduate/post-graduate or doing graduation/ post-graduate. The data were collected using a structured questionnaire (see Annexure A). Exploratory Factor analysis (EFA) has been conducted to figure out the factors that have positively impacted the students' satisfaction with online study. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) has been performed to confirm the factors. Results of the structural equation modeling show that instructor quality, course design, ICT orientation, conscientiousness, open-mindedness, and agreeableness have a positive impact and extraversion has a negative impact on the satisfaction of the students. The neurotic type of personality has no impact on the satisfaction of the students.

References

  • Aggarwal, A., Dhaliwal, R. S., & Nobi, K. (2018). Impact of structural empowerment on organizational commitment: the mediating role of women's psychological empowerment. Vision, 22(3), 284-294.
  • Aggarwal, A., Goyal, J., & Nobi, K. (2018). Examining the Impact of Leader-Member Exchange on Perceptions of Organizational Justice: The Mediating Role of Perceptions of Organizational Politics. Theoretical Economics Letters, 8(11), 2308-2329.
  • Ajzen, I. (2015). Consumer attitudes and behavior: the theory of planned behavior applied to food consumption decisions. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 70(2), 121-138.
  • Alvino, F., Di Vaio, A., Hassan, R., & Palladino, R. (2020). Intellectual capital and sustainable development: A systematic literature review. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(12), 1�19.
  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms : Goals, Structures, and Student Motivation, 84(3), 261�271.
  • Andrew j. Elliot. (2001). A 2*2 Achievement Goal Framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501�519.
  • Arambewela, R., & Hall, J. (2009). An empirical model of international student satisfaction. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 21(4), 555�569.
  • Biasutti, M., & El-Deghaidy, H. (2012). Using Wiki in teacher education: Impact on knowledge management processes and student satisfaction. Computers and Education, 59(3), 861�872.
  • Bidjerano, T., & Dai, D. Y. (2007). The relationship between the big-five model of personality and selfregulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(1), 69�81.
  • Chopra, G., Madan, P., Jaisingh, P., & Bhaskar, P. (2019). Effectiveness of e-learning portal from students' perspective: A structural equation model (SEM) approach. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(2), 94�116.
  • Cohen, A., & Baruth, O. (2017). Personality, learning, and satisfaction in fully online academic courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 72(2), 1�12.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). The costs and benefits of consuming. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 267�272.
  • Di Vaio, A., Boccia, F., Landriani, L., & Palladino, R. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the agri-food system: Rethinking sustainable business models in the COVID-19 scenario. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(12), 1�12.
  • Di Vaio, A., Palladino, R., Hassan, R., & Alvino, F. (2020). Human resources disclosure in the EU Directive 2014/95/EU perspective: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 257(10), 120509.
  • Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An Approach to Motivation and Achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5�12.
  • Endres, M. L., Chowdhury, S., Frye, C., & Hurtubis, C. A. (2009). The Multifaceted Nature of Online MBA Student Satisfaction and Impacts on Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Education for Business, 84(5), 304�312.
  • Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 667�673.
  • Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The Effects of Student Engagement, Student Satisfaction, and Perceived Learning in Online Learning Environments This. NCPEA International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), 98�119.
  • Heckhausen, H. (1977). Achievement motivation and its constructs: A cognitive model. Motivation and Emotion, 1(4), 283�329.
  • Hofstee, W. K. B., de Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and Circumplex Approaches to Trait Structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 146�163.
  • Kalafatis, S. P., Pollard, M., East, R., & Tsogas, M. H. (1999). Green marketing and Ajzen's theory of planned behaviour: A cross-market examination. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(5), 441�460.
  • Keller, H., & Karau, S. J. (2013). The importance of personality in students' perceptions of the online learning experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2494�2500.
  • Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers and Education, 51(2), 864�873.
  • Lin, Y. M., Lin, G. Y., & Laffey, J. M. (2008). Building a social and motivational framework for understanding satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 1�27.
  • Maina, E. K. (2010). The Communications Commission of Kenya, 1-68.
  • Manochehri, N. N., & Young, J. I. (2006). The Impact of Student Learning Styles With Web-Based Learning or Instructor-Based Learning on Student Knowledge and Satisfaction. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(3), 313�316.
  • Mccrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research, The Guilford Press, 159-181.
  • Miti?, S., Nikoli?, M., Jankov, J., Vukonjanski, J., & Terek, E. (2017). The impact of information technologies on communication satisfaction and organizational learning in companies in Serbia. Computers in Human Behavior, 76(7), 87�101.
  • Munteanu, C., Ceobanu, C., Bob�lc?, C., & Anton, O. (2010). An analysis of customer satisfaction in a higher education context. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(2), 124�140.
  • Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Mart�nez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(8), 401�421.
  • Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi delta kappan, 86(1), 8-21.
  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315�341.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459�470.
  • Ramsden, P. (1991). A Performance Indicator of Teaching Quality in Higher Education: The Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), 129�150.
  • Roff, K. A. (2018). Student Satisfaction and/or Dissatisfaction in Blended Learning Environments. Frontiers in Education Technology, 1(2), 149.
  • Shahzad, A., Hassan, R., Aremu, A. Y., Hussain, A., & Lodhi, R. N. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 in Elearning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female. Quality and Quantity, 7(0123456789), 1�22.
  • Shereen, M. A., Khan, S., Kazmi, A., Bashir, N., & Siddique, R. (2020). COVID-19 infection: Origin, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses. Journal of Advanced Research, 24(4), 91�98.
  • Shinn, E. H., Poston, W. S. C., Kimball, K. T., St. Jeor, S. T., & Foreyt, J. P. (2001). Blood pressure and symptoms of depression and anxiety: A prospective study. American Journal of Hypertension, 14(7 I), 660�664.
  • Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory�2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 69�81.
  • Urdan, T. C. (1997). Examining the relations among early adolescent students' goals and friends' orientation toward effort and achievement in school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(2), 165� 191.
  • Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (1995). Wooldridge Jennings.pdf. Knowledge Eng. Rev., 10(2), 115�152.
  • Zanotti, C., Looze, M. De, Roberts, C., & Barnekow, V. (2009). Social_determinants_of_health_and_wellb20151111 27604-w42wjb.
  • Ziglari, H., & Yahya, S. (1988). Deployment models: Enhancing security in cloud computing environment. Proceedings - Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications, APCC 2016, 80(3), 204�209.

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.