Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Year: 2020, Volume: 34, Issue: Special Issue, Pages: 49-56

Original Article

Using Rubrics to Assess E-learning in Vocational Education

Abstract

A rubric is an assessment tool that explicitly articulates the specific components and expectations for an assignment by listing criteria. It is important to include clear as well as concise descriptions of each criterion and level of performance when writing a rubric. The criteria are also needed to align with the assignment objectives. This study aims to see the effectiveness of using a rubric in e-learning assessments in vocational education using descriptive research with a cross-sectional approach. We conducted a limited survey of lecturers regarding the effectiveness of using rubrics in e-learning. Lecturers who were the sample of this study decided using a purposive sample. In capturing data, we used a research instrument in the form of a questionnaire using a Likert scale. The research results showed that there are many benefits of rubrics for both instructors and students. Using rubrics establishes clear expectations for students, saves instructors time in grading, and aids in grading consistency among teaching assistants. Rubrics allow for quick and detailed feedback and provide data to refine teaching methods based on results. Rubrics also help students to understand the requirements and expectations better, focus on required elements, see how assignments align with learning objectives and improve their work based on the instructor�s feedback.

References

  • Anstey, L. M., and Watson, G. L. P. (2018). Rubric for elearning tool evaluation. Retrieved October, 22, 2018.
  • Baldwin, S. J., and Trespalacios, J. (2017). Evaluation instruments and good practices in online education. Online Learning.
  • Begicevic, R.N., Balaban, I., Zugec, B., Klacmer Calopa, M., and Divjak, B. (2017). Framework for digitally mature schools. In EDEN 2017 Annual Conference Book of Abstracts (p. 39).
  • Benson, R., and Brack, C. (2010). Online learning and assessment in higher education: A planning guide. Elsevier.
  • Bentley, Y., Selassie, H., and Shegunshi, A. (2012). Design and Evaluation of Student-Focused e-learning. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 10(1), 1-12.
  • Butcher, N., and Wilson-Strydom, M. (2013). A guide to quality in online learning. 2013). Dallas, TX: Academic Partnerships. Retrieved on December, 12, 2013.
  • Campbell, A. (2005). Application of ICT and rubrics to the assessment process where professional judgement is involved: the features of an e?marking tool. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(5), 529-537.
  • Carole P. C, "Performance Assessment: Designing Appropriate Performance Tasks and Scoring Rubrics By." By. 12p,: In: Measuring Up: Assessment Issues for Teachers, Counselors, and Administrators: see 608. 032 2003
  • Chen, W., and Jia, J. (2016). Comparison of online and onsite students� learning outcomes and experiences in a massively open online course in China. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 9(1), 5.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., and Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140.
  • Dean, C. B., and Hubbell, E. R. (2012). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Ascd.
  • Fan, L., and Zhu, Y. (2008). Using performance assessment in secondary school mathematics: An empirical study in a Singapore classroom. Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 132-152.
  • Garc�a-Ros, R., P�rez-Gonz�lez, F., P�rez-Blasco, J., & Natividad, L. A. (2012). Evaluaci�n del estr�s acad�mico en estudiantes de nueva incorporaci�n a la universidad.
  • Art�culos en PDF disponibles desde 2007 hasta 2013. A partir de 2014 vis�tenos en www. elsevier. es/rlp, 44(2), 143 154.
  • Guidy-Oulai, A. M. (2009). The development and application of a checklist for evaluating e-learning in organizations.
  • Khalil, M. K., and Elkhider, I. A. (2016). Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction. Advances in physiology education, 40(2), 147 156
  • Kumar Basak, S., Wotto, M., and Belanger, P. (2018). Elearning, M-learning and D-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 191-216.
  • Mertler, C. A. (2000). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 7(1), 25.
  • Moskal, B. M. (2003). Developing Classroom Performance Assessments and Scoring Rubrics-Part I. ERIC Digest.
  • Muktiarni, M., Widiaty, I., Abdullah, A. G., Ana, A., and Yulia, C. (2019, December). Digitalisation trend in education during industry 4.0. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1402(7), 077070.
  • Muskin, J. A. (2015). Student Learning Assessment and the Curriculum: Issues and Implications for Policy, Design and Implementation. In-Progress Reflections No. 1 on" Current and Critical Issues in the Curriculum and Learning". UNESCO International Bureau of Education
  • Nordseth, H., Ekker, S., and Munkvold, R. (2010, November). Tools for peer assessment in an e-learning environment. In Seminar. net (Vol. 6, No. 3).
  • Orlando, J. (2011). How to effectively assess online learning. Magna Publications.
  • Paolini, A. (2015). Enhancing teaching effectiveness and student learning outcomes. Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 20-33
  • Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental?. Theory into practice, 48(1), 4-11.
  • Ragupathi, K., and Lee, A. (2020). Beyond fairness and consistency in grading: The Role of Rubrics in Higher Education. In Diversity and Inclusion in Global Higher Education (pp. 73-95).
  • Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore Raposo, M., & Mart�nez, E. (2011). La r�brica en la ense�anza universitaria: un recurso para la tutor�a de grupos de estudiantes. Formaci�n universitaria, 4(4), 19-28.
  • Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 35(4), 435-448.
  • Reigeluth, C. M. (2014). The learner-centered paradigm of education: Roles for technology. Educational Technology, 18-21
  • Rivasy, M.R., De La Serna, M.C., and Mart�nez-Figueira, E. (2014). Electronic rubrics to assess competences in ICT subjects. European Education Research Journal, 13(5), 584 594
  • Seifert, T. (2017). Training the teachers of tomorrow in an era of rapid technological advancement. i-Manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 35
  • Stinggins Richard J, Student-Centered Classroom Assessment, New York: New York: Mac Millan College Publishing Company, 1994
  • Tienson-Tseng, H. L. (2019). Best Practices in Summative Assessment. In Biochemistry Education: From Theory to Practice (pp. 219-243). American Chemical Society
  • Timmerman, B. E. C., Strickland, D. C., Johnson, R. L., and Payne, J. R. (2011). Development of a �universal� rubric for assessing undergraduates' scientific reasoning skills using scientific writing. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(5), 509-547.
  • Usman, Y. D. (2016). Educational resources: An integral component for effective school administration in Nigeria. Online Submission, 6(13), 27-37.
  • Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Garrido-Arroyo, M. D. C., Burgos Videla, C., and Morales-Cevallos, M. B. (2020). Trends in Educational Research about e-learning: A Systematic Literature Review (2009�2018). Sustainability, 12(12), 5153.
  • Wiggins, G. P., Wiggins, G., and McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Ascd.
  • Wiggins, G. P., Wiggins, G., and McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Ascd.
  • Wren, D. G. (2009). Performance assessment: a key component of a balanced assessment system. Research Brief. Report From The Department Of Reseacrh Evaluation, and Assessment, 2(2).
  • Wu, C. H., Chen, Y. S., and Chen, T. G. (2017). An adaptive e-learning system for enhancing learning performance: Based on dynamic scaffolding theory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(3), 903-913.
  • Jubaedah, Y., Rinekasari, N. R., Rohaeni, N., Maosul, A., a Ana, A. (2020). Competency based-assessment using electronic rubric: implementation on manual polishing practice in housekeeping. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 15(1), 046-053.

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.