Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Year: 2021, Volume: 34, Issue: 4, Pages: 43-50

Original Article

Promoting Engineering Education Through Visible Learning and Formative Assessment Strategies

Abstract

The assessment and teaching strategies are chief indicators of comprehended learning in the field of education. They are the critical moves in the learning process, specifically when related to engineering and science. The mediocre content delivery and inferior assessment affect several educational spheres, such as faculty development, student scores, placement, and life-long experience. These two factors considerably regulate the programspecific outcomes (PSOs) and course outcomes (COs). The present work focuses on analyzing the effects of learning and assessment methods to achieve the designated PSOs and COs through visible learning. The analysis has been carried out with Hattie's effect size that influences the program and course achievement. The process was monitored for two subjects offered to the limited population of undergraduate students of Electrical Engineering. The statistics have been derived in the effect size affected by the source of influence, aspect, and factor. Further, the possibilities of incorporating formative evaluation and visible learning in Indian engineering education is framed in the discussion.

References

  • UNESCO Report, Engineering: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities for Development, UNESCO, France, (2010) doi: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf00001 89753
  • Fernando, JL., and Zulma Cataldi. (2001) Education Quality and The Education Law: The Argentine Example, 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Nevada, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2001.963951
  • V. John. (1995) A Future Path for Engineering Education: Educating Engineers for Europe, Engineering Science and Education Journal, 4(3), 99-103.
  • I. Simpson. (1994) Engineering Education in Europe, IEEE Trans. Education, 37(2), 167-170.
  • P.C. da Silva Telles. (1992) A History of Engineering Education in Brazil, IEEE Communications Magazine, 30(11), 66-71.
  • J. Filipiak and A.R. Pach. (1992) Engineering Education in Poland, IEEE Communication Magazine, 30(11), 58-64.
  • Morita, E., Dodds, G. and Ogasawara, T. (1996) Education and Research in Japan, Engineering Science and Education Journal, 5(6), 257-262.
  • A.Y.M. Atiquil Islam, MMC Mok, X. Gu, J. Spector, C H-Leng. (2019) ICT in Higher Education: An Exploration of Practices in Malaysian Universities, IEEE Access, 7, 16892 16908.
  • Lpez-Pernas, S., Godillo, A., E. Barra and Quemada, J. (2019) Examining the Use of an Educational Escape Room for Teaching Programming in a Higher Education Setting, IEEE Access, 7, 31723-31737.
  • Maciejewski, AA., Chen TW., ZS Byrne, MA De Miranda, Mcmeeking, LBS., Notaros, BM., Pezeshki, A., Roy, S., Leland, AM., Reese, MD., Rosales, AH., Siller, TJ., Toftness, RF. and Notaros, O. (2017) A Holistic Approach to Transforming Undergraduate Electrical Engineering Education, IEEE Access, 5, 8148 8161.
  • Kri s ta F., Y��e z, GA. , Chapman, O., Cherkowski, G., Dodsworth, D., Friesen SD., Gereluk, PK. Cockett, APP.Babb, MC. Shanahan, Takeuchi, M., Thomas C., and Turner, J. (2018) Forming and Transforming STEM Teacher Education-A Follow up to Pioneering STEM Education, IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363297
  • L. Fallow. (1996) Engineering Education for The Future, Engineering Science and Education Journal, 5(5), 196-200.
  • Odesma, D. and Monica, FC. (2006) Work in Progress: Undergraduate Engineering Students' Perceptions of Engineering Education as an Academic Discipline, Proceedings. Frontiers in Education, 36th Annual Conference, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2006.322659
  • Tarek S. El-Bawab and Frank, E. (2017) Interactive Research- Based Instruction Strategies for Standards Education: Project ISTEE, IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(5), 110-114.
  • Kubilay, K. and Ozden, T. (2012) Challenges for Science Education, Elsevier, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 763-771.
  • Bradforth SE., Miller, ER., Dichtel, WR., Leibovich, AK., Feig, AL., Martin, JD., Bjorkman, KS., Schultz, ZD. and Smith, TL. (2015) Unive rs i ty Lea rning: Improve Undergraduate Science Education, International Weekly Journal of Science, 523, 282-284.
  • Waldrop MM. (2015), Why we are teaching science wrong, and how to make it right, International Weekly Journal of Science, 523, 272-275.
  • Ramachandran, R. (2004) Warning Bells- The U. R. Rao, Committee report-The AICTE Accreditation Fees and Fears, Frontline, 21(6)
  • Alberts, B. Considering Science Education, Science, Vol. 319, No. 5870, Mar 2008, pp. 1589.
  • Ashok S. and Venkatesh V. (Mar 2015). How to improve engineering education in India by 2025. [online]. Available as on 20 April 2020: http://www.set.gtu.ac.in/PDF/Mision2025.pdf
  • Charlotta V. (2014). Formative Assessment: Teacher Knowledge and Skills to make it happen. [Online]. Available as on 20 April 2020: https://umu.diva- portal.org.
  • Caroline B. and Ivan M. (2004), Effective Learning and Teaching in Engineering, 1st Edition, Taylor and Francis Group, Great Britain, pp. 28.
  • Robert C. (2002) It's the effect size, Stupid what effect size is and why it is important, Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, Exeter, [online]. Available: https://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/000 02182.htm
  • John H. (2012), Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning, 1st edition, Routledge, United Kingdom.
  • Niebert, K. (2018). Teaching Science at University, University of Zurich, Coursera MOOC [Online]. Available as on 20 April 2020: https://www.coursera.org.
  • Kostas, K. (2017) Science Teaching in University Science Departments- The �missing link� in science education? Sci & Edu, Springer Science, 20(3-4), 201-203.
  • Progress Vs. Achievement Tool. (2018). Visible Learning Pulse [online]. Available as on 20 April 2020 : https://www.visiblelearning.com/resourceshttps ://www.visiblelearningplus.com.
  • Institutional Accreditation Manual for Self Study Report Universities, National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC), Bengaluru, 2017, 148.
  • Camilla, S. (2006), Exploring a Rose-Garden Norwegian youth's orientations towards science� seen as signs of late modern identities, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Teacher Edu. and School Develop., Univ. of Oslo, Oslo.
  • Oliver, B. and McCann, E. (2016). Think Up Experience-led learning for engineers-A good practice guide. Royal Academy of Engineering. London. [Online]. Available: https://thinkup.org/reports/experience-led-learning/

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.