Sakthivel Sankaran
1*,
M. Pallikonda Rajasekaran
2,
C. Sivapragasam
3
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Krishnankoil, TN, India
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Krishnankoil, TN, India
- Department of Civil Engineering, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Krishnankoil, TN, India
Abstract
Bio Sensors and Transducers (BST) is a fundamental subject that provides principles of operations of sensors used in biomedical applications, and transducers are the devices that transmit the signals from the biosensors to the diagnosing equipment. BST is the introductory course in Bachelors of Biomedical Engineering (BME). BST interconnects biosensors and transducers in such a way that the signals are transmitted to the receiving equipment. Given the above, this paper describes the teaching and in-depth learning of BST in the classroom sessions which makes the students challenge and solve real-time problems practically, more effectively and efficiently. At the end of each unit, a practical assignment is given and executed by the students in the BST laboratories. These improve critical thinking, analyzing, interpreting, and solving techniques for students. The primary objective of this paper is to enhance the in-depth learning of the BST course by critical analysis, utilizing creative ideas, novel thinking of extension of existing technologies, and practicing laboratory experiments. The outcomes of this course are analyzed by internal assessment tests, periodical assignments, results of the laboratory experiments, seminars, and quiz programs. With the help of Bloom's taxonomy, the assessment test questions were ranked and the results are investigated for the improvement of intellectual thinking of students on the contents of the course.The academic transformation of students is measured by using both course outcomes and student feedback. This approach helped the students to improve their understanding of the subject.
References
- Anitha et al. 2018, Assessing and Enhancing Creativity in a Laboratory Course with ProjectBased Learning, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 32 (2).
- Aruna et al. 2017, An approach for attainment of relevant Program Out comes through Microcontroller laboratory course, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 30 (3).
- Biasutti et al. 2015, Interdisciplinary projectbased learning: an online wiki experience in teacher education, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(3) 339-355.
- Danco Davcev et al., 2016, Project Based Learning of Embedded Systems, Proceedings of the 2nd WSEAS International Conference on CIRCUITS, SYSTEMS, SIGNAL an d TELECOMMUNICATIONS (CISST'08) Acapulco, Mexico, January 25-27, 2008. ISSN: 1790-5117, ISBN: 978-960-6766-34-3, pp.120125 doi: https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.07498.
- De los R�os-Carmenado et al., 2015, Promoting professional project management skills in engineering higher education: Project-based learning (PBL) strategy, International Journal of Engineering Education 31(1), 1-15.
- Dole et al., 2016, Rocket to Creativity: A Field Experience in Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning, Global Education Review, 3(4).
- Dontham et al., 2016, Educating IT Engineering Theory Courses Using BLOOMS Taxonomy (TC-BT) as a Tool and Practical Courses Using Magic of Making Mistakes (PCMoMM): An Innovative Pedagogy, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 29(3), 75-84.
- Han et al., 2015, How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) projectbased learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089-1113.
- Lou et al., 2017, A Study of Creativity in CaC2 Steamship-derived STEM Project-based Learning, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(6), 23872404.
- McGibbonetal. , 2015, Integrating environmental sustainability issues into the curriculum through problem-based and projectbased learning: a case study at the University of Cape Town, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 16, 81-88.
- Mukund V. Kavad et al., 2015, Assessment and attainment of Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 28(2-3), 77-84.
- NBA-National Board of Accreditation. NBA National Board of Accreditation. Accessed July 03, 2019. http://www.nbaind.org/.
- Poonpon and Kornwipa, 2017, Enhancing English skills through project-based learning, The English teacher: 1.0.
- Rasul et al., 2017, Developing Scientific Creativity through STEM Project Based Learning Orientation , In Conference Proceedings. New Perspectives in Science Education, p. 370.
- Vijayalakshmi S. and Nagarajan V, 2019, Energy Efficient Low Density Parity Check Scheme for Body Channel Communication using FPGA, Microprocessors and Microsystems, 68, 84-91.
- VRSV Bharath Pulavarthi et al., 2017, Implementation of Course-Mini Project (CMP) in Core Laboratory Course for the Attainment of Program Out comes in Out come Based Education, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 30(3).
- Zhang et al., 2016, Teaching power electronics with a design-oriented, project-based learning method at the Technical University of Denmark, IEEE Transactions on Education, 59(1), 32-38.
- Chandra R. Sekhar et al., 2008, Continuous Improvement Process Based on Outcome Based Education, Proceedings of the 2008 IAJC-IJME International Conference ISBN 978-1-60643379-9.
- AICTE-All India Council for Technical Education, https://www.aicteindia.org/sites/default/files/ExaminationReforms.pdf, November, 2018
