Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Year: 2020, Volume: 33, Issue: 4, Pages: 76-83

Original Article

PO Assessment and Attainment through POGIL Based Classes

Abstract

This paper describes the development of POGIL based instructional design classes for complex engineering problems described in the Program Outcomes (PO) of National Board of Accreditation (NBA), India accreditation criteria. Embedded system Design course in Electronics and Communication Engineering course (ECE) is considered for experimentation. Subsequently it aims at providing students and interested fresh faculty an opportunity to design and build the project on their own. The aim of the project is to design a round robin based embedded system where the tasks are of their choice. To structure and complete their design part, both students and faculty were posed with a large number of questions. They were asked to refer literature and data sheets for their work. Once the design part was reviewed to avoid critical errors, students built their project and compared solutions to theoretical predictions. Feedback was collected and analysed to determine the effectiveness of POGIL in PO attainment. The reflections given by both faculty and students were positive, in particular students found that solving complex engineering problems are quite difficult and challenging compared to other prescribed book end exercises but POGIL helped them to be more constructive to build their knowledge.

References

  • Barrie, S. (2005). Rethinking generic graduate attributes, HERDSA News, Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, vol 27(1), pp.1-6.
  • Bhimasen Soragaon1 & K S Mahesh (2015), �Measuring Attainment of Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes � A Simplified Approach as per Self-Assessment Report�, IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education vol 4 pp 1318,
  • Biggs, J (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university, Open University Press: Buckingham, McGraw-Hill Education (UK)
  • Bowden, J., Hart, G., King, B., Trigwell, K. & Watts, O. (2000). Generic capabilities of ATN niversity Graduates, Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. http://www.clt.uts.edu.au/atn.grad.cap.project.index.htm
  • Darrall Thompson, (2008), � Software as a facilitator of graduate attribute integration and student self-assessment� ATN Assessment conference: Engaging Students with Assessment , pp. 234�246, DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10453/11332
  • David M. Hanson, (2003). Designing Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Activities, http://www.pcrest.com/research/fgb/2_4_14.pdf Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Volume, No, Month 2015, ISSN 2349-2473, eISSN 2394-1707
  • Dena Hale & Linda Greef Mullen,(2009). Designing Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Activities: A New Innovation for marketing classes, Marketing Education Review, Vol 19(1)
  • Elliot P. Douglas, Chu-Chuan Chiu,� Process-oriented Guided Inquiry Learning in Engineering� International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (ICTLHE 2012) in conjunction with RCEE & RHED 2012
  • Hughes C & S. Barrie, (2010), �Influences on the assessment of graduate attributes in higher education, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), pp. 325�334.
  • Lawrence Meda & Arthur James Swart,(2017). Graduate Attributes in Electrical Engineering a case study, International Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 33 2(A), pp. 653�661
  • Masoodhu Banu N.M & Rajeswari K. (2017, June). POGIL based classes for communication engineering course, 13th International CDIO Conference, Calgary, Canada
  • Nghiem, L. D., Goldfinch, T. Bell, M. (2010). Embedding graduate attribute development into the engineering curriculum: less is more?. The 21st Annual Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, pp. 165169. Sydney: Australasia Association of Engineering Education.
  • Priya Sawant, (2016) �Implementation of Outcome Based Education: A Beginning, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, vol 29, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289686628_Implementation_of_Outcome_Based_Education_ A_Beginning
  • Rachel S p r o n k e n - S m i t h , Carol Bond.,Angela McLean., Martin Jenkins., Stanley Frielick., Nell Smith., & Stephen Marshall, Developing and Embedding Graduate Attributes: Lessons for lecturers, programme directors, heads of department and senior managers in higher education institutions� available online. Https://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/download/ng/file/group-4/developing-and-embedding-graduateattributesspronken-smith-2014.pdf
  • Sahasrabudhe, S.C(2014). CO-PO mapping and attainment of CO-PO. http://www.nbaind.org/files/co-po-mappingandattainment-of-cos-and-pos.pdf
  • Sumison, J. and Goodfellow, J. (2004) �Identifying generic skills through curriculum mapping: a critical evaluation� Higher Education Research and Development, 23, 329�346.
  • Wendy Green, Sarah Hammer & Cassandra Star (2009). Facing up to the challenge: why is it so hard to develop graduate attributes?, Higher Education Research & Development, 28:1, 1729, DOI: 10.1080/07294360802444339

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.