Ajitkumar P. Madival
*,
M. B. Gorawar
,
R. P. Tapaskar
,
R. S. Hosmath
,
P. P. Revankar
- School of Mechanical Engineering, KLETU, Hubballi, India
Abstract
Use of simulation software packages based on numerical techniques has been relatively cheaper, faster and normally more ethical than conduct of realtime experiments. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) that basically evolved through application of numerical techniques to physical laws of conservation of mass, momentum and energy. CFD has revolutionized solution to fluid flow, heat transfer, mass transfer and other multidisciplinary problems. CFD requires a strong mathematical base with the thorough understanding of physics behind the problems. The present work deals with delivery and assessment of CFD concepts through the theory and laboratory courses for students of Graduate Program inE nergy Systems Engineering.The delivery and assessment of the CFD courses targeted the attainment of the Graduate Attributes (GA) PO2, PO4, PO5 and PO6 prescribed for the graduate programme.The results of pedagogical initiatives in teaching this course to heterogeneous student group imposed few challenges in delivery due to only 37.5% of the group being familiar to the course prerequisites while 62.5% of the group was alien to these concepts. The results indicated that meticulous planning and execution of the courses to the diverse group resulted in the overall average score of 61.4% and 82.04% in theory and lab course respectively.
References
- Jiyuan Tu, Guan-Heng Yeoh, Chaoqun Liu, Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Practical Approach, Elsevier publications, Second edition, 2013.
- Ajitkumar P. Madival, M.B. Gorawar, R.S. Hosmath, P.P. Revankar, Rakesh Tapaskar, Ashok Kumbar, "Challenges and remedies in interdisciplinary PG Programme", Journal of Engineering Education Transformation, Special edition, Jan 2016.
- Willy Morscheidt, Simeon Cavadias, Frederic Rousseau, Bradley Da Silva, Pollution of the Rhine River: An Introduction to Numerical Modelling, Education for Chemical Engineers, 8, 2013, 119-123.
- Frederick Stern, Tao Xing, Donald B. Yarbrough, Alric Rothmayer, Ganesh Rajagopalan, Shourya Prakash Otta, David Caughey, Rajesh Bhaskaran, Sonya Smith, Barbara Hutchings, Shane Moeykens, Hands On CFD Educational Interface for Engineering Courses and Laboratories, Journal of Engineering Education, January 2006, 63-83.
- Ian T.Cameron, Daniel R. Lewin,Curricular and pedagogical challenges for enhanced graduate attributes in CAPE, Computers and Chemical Engineering, 33, 2009, 1781-1792.
- Rod Dry, Hashil Rabadia, Diana Felipe, Gordon Ingram, Nicoleta Maynard, Esther Ventura Medina, Sigma Pipe as an education tool for engineers, education for chemical engineers, 14, 2016, 1-15.
- Jin-Yeu Tsou, St rat egy on applying computational fluid dynamic for building performance evaluation, Automation in Construction 10, 2001, 327-335.
- D. Adair, Martin Jaeger, Preparing Mechanical Engineering Design Students for Computational Fluid Dynamics Code Development, ICEE2015, At Zagreb, Croatia.
- Luis Palomino, Mohamed S. El-Genk, Computational Fluid Dynamics and Thermal Hydraulic Analyses of SLIMM Reactor Passive Decay Heat Removal by Natural Circulation of Ambient Air, Nuclear Technology, Volume 195, July 2016.
- David Wafula Wekesa, Cong Wang,Yingjie Wei, Empirical and numerical analysis of small wind turbine aerodynamic performance at a plateau terrain in Kenya, Renewable Energy 90, 2016, 377-385.
