Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

References

• Arunkumar B. R (2015). The relevance of Bhagavad Gita to NBA graduate attributes, International Journal of Research in Fig 7: Graph showing . imorvements in PO attainment due to VACs, PBL,Case study etc Management & Social Science, 3(3), 2322 � 0899.
• Arun Kumar B. R (2017). Outcomes Based Education (OBE) Teaching-Learning plan: A Case study of Operating System Course, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research (IJMER), 6(4), 182-194.
• Arun Kumar B.R (2019). Defining course outcomes, designing OBE Question paper and scrutinizing to align question paper with targeted Cos, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational research, 1(2)), 79-88.
• Arun Kumar B.R (2018). How to enable and motivate slow and fast learners for fostering the attainment of Programme outcomes in Outcome Based Education, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research, 7 (12),188-196.
• Abidin, Z., Anuar, A., Shuaib, N. H. (2009). Assessing the attainment of course outcomes (co) for an engineering course. Proceedings of the 2nd ICTL, Malaysia, 1-7.
• Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn & Bacon. Boston, MAPearson Education Group.
• Basri, N. E. A., Taib, K. A., Jaafar, O., Zain, S. M., Suja, F., Kasa, A., Shanmugam, N. E. (2010). An evaluation of programme educational objectives and programme outcomes for civil engineering programmes. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 56-64.
• Bhagyalaksmi, H. R., Seshachalam, D., Lalitha, S. (2015). Program outcome attainment through course outcome: A comprehensive approach. In Natrajan, R. (Ed.), Proceedings of the international conference on transformations in engineering education, Springer, 279-287.
• Biney, P., Bryant, M. R. (2005). A novel strategy for the direct assessment and improvement of engineering programs developed and implemented by Prairie View A&M University. Paper presented at ASEE conference, Portland, Management & Social Science, 3(3), 2322 � 0899.
• Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/a-novelstrategyfor-the-direct-assessment-andimprovementof-engineering-programsdeveloped-and-implemented-by-prairie-view-amuniversity.
• Bloom, B., Engelhart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longmans.
• Dalton, E. (2003). The �new bloom's taxonomy,� objectives and assessments. Retrieved from http://gaeacoop.org/dalton/publications/new_bl oom.pdf
• Drakshayani, D. N. (2016). A preliminary study on Attainment of course outcomes for outcome based education in mechanical engineering using a case study of material science and metallurgy. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 6, 76-83.
• Elaine H.J.Yew, Karen Goh ((2016). ProblemBased Learning: An Overview of its Process and Impact on Learning, Health Professions Education, 275�79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004
• Gurocak, H. (2008). Direct measures for course outcomes assessment for ABET accreditation. Paper presented at American Society Engineering Education, Pittsburgh, PA.
• Haolader, F. A., Ali, R. M., Foysol, K. M. (2015). The taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: Current practices at polytechnics in Bangladesh and its effects in developing students. Competences International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2, 99-118.
• Houshangi, N. (2003). Curriculum assessment and enhancement at Purdue University Calumet based on ABET 2000. Paper presented at American Society for Engineering Education, Hammond, IN. Retrieved from http://ilin.asee.org/doc/Paper3B1.pdf
• Lynn Meek Ulrich Teichler Mary-Louise Kearney (eds.) (2010) Higher Education, Research and Innovation: Changing Dynamics Report on the UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge 20012009.
• Masni-Azian, A., Rahimah, A. H., Othman, M. S. (2014). Towards OBE: A case study of course outcome (CO) and programme outcome (PO) attainment for product design and development course. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 4, 55-61.
• Massa, L. J., Kasimatis, M. (2017). Meaningful and manageable program assessment: A how-to guide for higher education faculty. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
• Memon, Q. A., Harb, A. (2009). Developing electrical engineering education program assessment process at UAE University. Australian Journal of Engineering Education, 15, 155-164.
• Madhuri Mavinkurve (2016). Development and Assessment of Engineering Design Competencies using Technology-Enhanced Learning environment, Inter-Disciplinary Program in Educational Technology, IIT, Bombay.
• Palomba, C., Banta, T. (1999). The essentials of successful assessment. In Palomba, C. A., Banta, T. W. (Eds.), Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education. San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass, 85-114.
• PK Tulsi and MP Poonia (2015). Expectations of Industry from Technical Graduates: Implications for Curriculum and Instructional Processes, , Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Special Issue: Jan., eISSN 2394-1707, page.no.,19-24.
• Ramchandra, S., Maitra, S., MallikarjunaBabu, M. (2014). Method for estimation of attainment of program outcome through course outcome for outcome based education. Paper presented at IEEE International Conference on MOOC, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/ 7020231
• Ranganath, R. V. (2016). Some examples for CO-PO mapping and corresponding assessments. http://www.nbaind.org/files/Somemoreexamples-on-attainment-of-COs-and-PO21-may-2016.pdf
• Rao, N. J. (2015). Outcome based education. http://textofvideo.nptel.ac.in/127108005/lec4.p df
• Sahasrabudhe, A. (2015). Outcome based education and NBA accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.nbaind.org/files/obe-and-nbaaccreditation.pdf
• Shaeiwitz, J., Briedis, D. (2007, June 24-27). Direct assessment measures. Paper presented at American Society of Engineering Education, Honolulu, HI.
• Shane, H. G. (1981). Significant writings that have influenced the curriculum. Phi Delta Kappan, 62, 311-314.
• Soragaon, B., Mahesh, K. S. (2016). Measuring attainment of course outcomes and program outcomes�A simplified approach as per selfassessment report�June 2015. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 6, 13-18.
• Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
• Suskie, L. (2004). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
• Turkmen, N., Khaled, A. R. A., Al-Raghbi, O. M., Zaki, G., Siddique, M., Gari, A., Bokhary, A. (2010). Procedure to assess engineering courses based on program outcomes. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27196 2976_A_Procedure_to_Assess_Engineering_C ourses_Based_on_Program_Outcomes
• Tamim, S. R., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Definitions and Uses: Case Study of Teachers Implement ing Project -based Learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1323.
• Viswanadha, R. S. (2016). Outcome based education. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aitqARyQkRQ
• Wahab, H. F. A., Ayob, A., Zaki, W. M. D. W., Hussain, H., Hussain, A., Mokri, S. S. (2011). Program outcomes measurement and assessment processes. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 49-55.
• Wang Lixun (2011). Designing and Implementing outcome-based learning in a Linguistic course: A case study of Hong Kong, Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 12, 918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.004