Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Year: 2018, Volume: 32, Issue: 2, Pages: 30-38

Original Article

Institutionalizing Continuous Improvement Plan for Program Assessment

Abstract

Continuous improvement is a corner stone of a quality engineering or engineering technology program. Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology requires that a well-planned and implemented continuous improvement plan should be in place.A successful continuous improvement plan that is institutionalized is self-driven and does not require external stimuli. For example, if an outcome assessment goal is not reached in an academic term, a sequence of events/actions are set in motion to address the deficiency. Evidence of existence of an institutionalized continuous improvement plan include but not limited to: A timeline of repeated activities related to the assessment and evaluation of student outcomes, agreed upon performance indicators to assess learning outcomes, systematic data collection focusing on direct evidence of student performance related to the student outcomes. Various data streams feeding into the assessment plan may include, course assessment data, senior exit survey, alumni and employer survey, internship reports and feedback from industrial advisory boards.

References

  • (ABET) Criteria For Accrediting Programs In Engineering In The United States, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc., 111 Market Place, Suite 1050, Baltimore, Maryland 21202-4012.http: //www.abe t.ba.md.us /EAC/eac2000.html
  • Lutz, F. (1996)Chair, �A Framework for the Assessment of Engineering Education,� The Joint Task Force on Engineering Education Assessment (ABET, ASEE, EDC, NCEES and NSPE), ASEEPrism, 5 (9), 188-26.
  • McGourty, J. (1998) In Strategies for developing implementing, and institutionalizing a comprehensive assessment process for engineering education, Frontiers in Education Conference, 1998. FIE'98. 28th Annual, IEEE; pp. 117-121.
  • McGourty, J. (1999) Four strategies to integrate assessment into the engineering educational environment. Journal of Engineering Education, 88 (4), 391.
  • McGourty, J.; Sebastian, C.; Swart, W. (1998) Developing a comprehensive assessment program for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 87 (4), 355.
  • Doepker, P. (1999, June), The Development And Implementation Of An Assessment Plan For Engineering Programs:A Model For Continuous Improvement, Paper presented at 1999 Annual Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina. https://peer.asee.org/7577
  • Christoforou, A. P.; Yigit, A. S.; Al-Ansary, M. D.;Ali, F.; Lababidi, H.;Nashawi, I.; Tayfun,A.; Zribi, M., (2003) Improving engineering education at Kuwait University through continuous assessment. International Journal of EngineeringEducation, 19 (6), 818-827.
  • Park, S.; Hironaka, S.; Carver, P.; Nordstrum, L. (2013) Continuous improvement in education. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. www.carnegiefoundation.org
  • J�rgensen, F.; Busk Kofoed, L. (2007) Integrating the development of continuous improvement and innovation capabilities into engineering education. European Journal of engineering education, 32 (2), 181-191.
  • Garry, B. (2015) Developing a Sustainable ABET Continuous Improvement Plan, ASEE Zone III Conference Proceedings, 2015 www. ASEE.org
  • Plaza, I.; Medrano, C. T. (2007) Continuous improvement in electronic engineering education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 50 (3), 259-265.
  • Hogg, R. V.; Hogg, M. C. (1995) Continuous quality improvement in higher education. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique, Volume 63, No., pp. 35-48.
  • Verma, A. K.; Crossman, G. (2007) In an assessment and continuous improvement model for engineering technology programs, Proceedings ASEE Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, pp.601-610.

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.