Abstract
The main issue the Indian engineering education system has been facing is poor employability. Earlier solutions to tackle the issue were unclear and now the NBA (National Board of Accreditation) has provided solution by identifying a list of graduate attributes.The attribute list has defined what is to be done and has left the task of how it is to be done to the engineering institutes.The colleges are not able to manage the 'how' part due to the heavy curricular load and the paucity of qualified faculty.We present a solution of conducting a one-day workshop on 'innovating success' that can help develop the attributes and identify appropriate final year projects, which can further accentuate the development. We conducted the workshop at a leading college in the state of Maharashtra that was successful in providing opportunities to develop the attributes as per the participants' rating. The workshop also provided a superior learning experience as per the overall workshop rating given by the participants. It was 4.5 out of 5. We need to extend the workshop to two days, or carry out iteration, or design a semester long course to strengthen the development. Given the size of the Indian engineering education system, we would require effective scaling solutions.
References
- AICTE. All Indian Council of Technical Education - Dashboard. 2016 [cited 2016 13Sep-2016]; Available from: http://www.aicteindia.org/dashboard/pages/dashboardaicte.php.
- Blom, A. and H. Saeki, Employability and skill set of newly graduated engineers in India. 2011.
- Aspiring_Minds, National employability report of engineers 2016, Aspiring Minds.
- Kotturshettar, B. and A. Shettar. Mapping Graduate Attributes of NBA with the Program Outcomes of the ABET/OBE to Establish Consistency between the Two. in Proceedings of the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education. 2015. Springer.
- Rawson, G.e.a. How to scale personalized learning. 2016;Available from: http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/socialsector/ our-insights/how-to-scale-personalizedlearning?cid=other-eml-alt-mip-mck-oth-1608.
- Waychal, P. A Framework for Developing Innovation Competencies. in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2016. New Orleans,US.
- Ashcraft, C. and A. Breitzman,Who invents IT? An analysis of women's participation in information technology patenting. National Center for Women & IT, 2007.
- London_Business_School, Men and Women in Teams. Lehman Brothers Centre for Women in Business, London Business School, 2007.
- Kurtzberg, T.R. and T.M. Amabile, From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 2001. 13(3-4): p. 285-294.
- Hargadon, A., How breakthroughs happen: The surprising truth about how companies innovate. 2003:Harvard Business Press.
- Hansen,M.T. and J. Birkinshaw, The innovation value chain. Harvard business review, 2007. 85(6): p. 121.
- Bessant, J., K. M�slein, and V. Von Stamm, In search of innovation. The Wall Street Journal, 2009. 22.
- Covey, S., The seven habits of highly successful people. Fireside/Simon & Schuster, 1989.
- Sipos, Y., B. Battisti, and K. Grimm, Achieving transformative sustainability learning: engaging head, hands and heart. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2008. 9(1): p. 68-86.
- Nichols, S.P. and N.E. Armstrong, Engineering entrepreneurship: Does entrepreneurship have a role in engineering education? Antennas and Propagation Magazine, IEEE, 2003. 45(1): p. 134-138.
- Easton, F., Educating the whole child,"head, heart, and hands": Learning from the Waldorf experience. Theory into Practice, 1997. 36(2): p. 87-94.
- Stauffer, M. and D.-E. Pehrsson, Mindfulness competencies for counselors and psychotherapists. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 2012. 34(3): p. 227-239.
- Appelbaum, R., et al., China's (Not So Hidden) Developmental State: Becoming a Leading Nanotechnology Innovator in the 21st Century. 2009.
- Munshi, P., Making breakthrough innovation happen: how eleven Indians pulled off the impossible. 2009: Collins Business.
- Patton, E. and S.H. Appelbaum, The case for case studies in management research. Management Research News, 2003. 26(5): p. 60-71.
- Steiner, G. and A. Posch, Higher education for sustainability by means of transdisciplinary case studies: an innovative approach for solving complex, real-world problems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2006. 14(9): p. 877-890.
- Taiichi, O. Ask 'why' five times about every matter. 2006 14-09-2016]; Available from: http://www.toyota-global.com/company/toyota_traditions/quality/ mar_apr_2006.html.
- Christensen, C.M. and M.E. Raynor, The Innovator's DNA. Harvard Business School Press,Massachusetts. Solution, 2003.
- Waychal, P., et al., Towards a framework for innovations. International Journal of Business Excellence, 2011. 4(5): p. 493-518.
- Sirkin,H.L., P.Keenan, and A. Jackson,The hard side of change management. Harvard business review, 2005. 83(10): p. 108.
- Ashkenas, R., Change management needs to change. Harvard business review, blog, https://hbr. org, 2013. 4.
- Perry, W., et al., Grand challenges for engineering. National Academy of Engineering, Washington,DC, 2008.
- . Strauss, A. and J. Corbin, Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of qualitative research, 1994: p. 273-285.
- Creswell, J.W. and D.L. Miller, Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice, 2000. 39(3): p. 124-130.
- Golafshani, N., Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative report, 2003. 8(4): p. 597-606.
- Rossman, G.B. and S.F. Rallis, Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. 2011:Sage.
