Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Year: 2018, Volume: 31, Issue: Special Issue, Pages:

Original Article

Impact of Multimedia Use in Online GIT Classes

Abstract

Online education has become one of the most sought after education modes in recent years. The online learning environment is evolving and its main focus is to reach students at distant location. Graphic Information technology (GIT) program offered by a large public university in the Southwestern United States also offers multiple online classes for its students. The main aim of this study is to find the impact of multimedia on online GIT classes. The study tries to find out students' preferred mode of learning, shortcomings they found in the mode, and their choice of multimedia for online classes. This study also looks into the faculty's preferred mode and choice of multimedia. All the data is collected through electronic surveys designed separately for each group. The collected data helps in understanding the impact multimedia has on students' learning.

References

  • Price, J. (2010, June 7). Definition of Online Education. Retrieved September 15, 2015, from http://www.ehow.com/about_6600628_definitiononlineeducation.html
  • Foundations of educational theory for online learning. (2004). In Theory and Practice of Online Learning. California: Athabasca University.
  • How do we Learn? (n.d.). Retrieved from http://general-psychology.weebly.com/how-do-welearn.html
  • Nafukho, F., & Irby, B. (n.d.). Learner's Perception of Engagement in Online Learning. In Handbook of Research on Innovative Technology Innovation in Higher Education. Texas: Texas A & M university.
  • Ni, A. (n.d.). Comparing the Effectiveness of Classroom and Online Learning: Teaching Research Methods. NASPA.
  • Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K., Marsh, E., Nathan, M., & Willingham, D. (2013). Improving Students� Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psycholo. Sage Journals.
  • Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (n.d.). Scope of Distance Learning. In Distance Education: A systems view of online learning (Third ed.). Wadsworth Cengage learning.
  • Mayer, R. (2009). Introduction to Multimedia Learning. In Multimedia Learning (Second ed.).
  • Santa Barbara, California: Cambridge Press. Plass, J., Moreno, R., & Brunken, R. (Eds.). (n.d.). Cognitive load theory. Frontmatter.
  • Clark, R.C. & Nguyen, F. & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in Learning: Evidence?Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. Miller, G. A. (1956).
  • The Magical Number Seven. Retrieved September 20, 2008, from Music Animation Machine Web site: http://www.musanim.com/miller1956/ Schnotz, W. & Kurschner, C. (2007).
  • A Reconsideration of Cognitive Load Theory. Educational Psychology Review. Volume 19, Number 4 / December, 2007, 469?508.
  • Sawaya, S. (2010). Reducing Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning.
  • Roland Brunken , Jan L. Plass & Detlev Leutner (2003) Direct Measurement of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning, Educational Psychologist, 38:1, 53-61, DOI: 10.1207/ S15326985EP3801_7

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.