Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Year: 2017, Volume: 30, Issue: 3, Pages: 114-122

Original Article

HBL for Effective Implementation of Problem Statements during Lab Session

Abstract

Practical work motivates the students, inspires their interest in the course, enhances their understanding about the course, improves the problem analyzing and solving skills, bridge the gap between teachings and understanding the course, concentrate on the fundamentals and its application etc. Various active and cooperative learning methods are practiced in the teaching-learning process to engage students in activity-based or problem-based learning and motivate them to enhance their understanding about the course. In this study, we considered the handout based learning during the laboratory session and titled this activity as HBL (Handout based Learning). We have designed the handouts for the various courses like C-Programming, Digital Technique, System Programming and Mobile Application Development course of Computer and Allied branches. Also we considered the case study of HBL for Mobile Application Development and Digital Technique course. Based on the students' response and feedback for HBL activity, we observed that there is an improvement in the students' problem solving skill and application implementation.

References

  • Harold I. Modell, Joel A. Michael, Tom Adamson, Barbara Horwitz. (2003) Enhancing active learning in the student laboratory Advances in Physiology Education Published 1 September 2004 Vol. 28 no. 3, 107-111DOI: 10.1152/advan.00049.2003
  • Modell HI, Michael JA, Adamson T, Goldberg J, Horwitz BA, Bruce DS, Hudson ML, White scarver SA, and Williams S. (2000) Helping undergraduates repair faculty mental models in the student laboratory. Adv Physiol Educ 23: 82-90, 2000.
  • Modell HI. (1991) Designing protocols for student laboratories. Comput Life SciEduc 8: 91-94, 1991.
  • Ingebj�rg Strand et.al. (2009) Students Learning in a Skills Laboratory.V�RD INORDEN3/2009. PUBL. NO. 93VOL. 29NO. 3PP18-22
  • Toplis, R. (2012). Students' views about secondary school science lessons: The role of practical work. Research in Science Education, 42, 531-549. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9209-6.
  • IshtiakAhmed, Ahmed Shehab Khan, Md. Yusuf and Syed Akhter Hossain (2013). Experimental Teaching Technique for Mobile Application Development. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 6, June-2013 1478, ISSN 2229-5518
  • Dkeidek, I., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Hofstein, A. (2012). Assessment of the laboratory learning environment in an inquiry-oriented chemistry laboratory in Arab and Jewish high schools in Israel. Learning Environments Research, 15, 141-169. doi:10.1007/s10984-012-9109-3.
  • Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education: Thirty years of experience with developments, implementation and research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5(3), 247-264.
  • Hofstein,A., Kipnis,M., & Kind, P. (2008). Learning in and from science laboratories: Enhancing students' meta-cognition and argumentation skills. In C. L. Petroselli (Ed.), Science education issues and developments (pp. 59-94). London:Nova Science.
  • Clara Davies (2008). Learning and Teaching in the laboratory. The Higher Education Academy. Accessed from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/learning-teaching-labs.pdf on 01-09-2016
  • Woolnough, B. E. (1991). Setting the scene. In B. E. Woolnough (Ed.), Practical science (pp. 3-9). Milton Keynes:Open University Press.

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.