C. Jeyamala
*,
A. M. Abirami
- Department of Information Technology, Thiagarajar College of Engineering , Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India
Abstract
The paper presents a detailed impact analysis of incorporating appropriate active learning strategies for enhancing student learning and engagement in the first year introductory course on Problem Solving using Computers. The major challenge in Education system is that, most of the graduates learn by rote all the way from school to college. Most of the students do not have prior experience in programming and exhibit an aversion towards programming. Active learning techniques have been proved as a viable solution to eradicate rote learning. In order to promote higher order cognitive skills and student engagement, a systematic plan incorporating appropriate active learning techniques has been designed. The experimental study has been carried out in a first year student group comprising of 119 members from the Department of Information Technology at Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai. Along with traditional assessment strategies, exclusive rubrics have been designed to measure the learning outcomes.This blend of instructor led and inquiry based teaching practices in the introductory course on Problem Solving using Computers has shown positive impact on student learning and engagement. Compared with the previous academic years, Students' performance in continuous assessment and End Semester Examinations has improved significantly. Positive feedback from students and increased count of participation in programming contests and online certifications demonstrate the improved effectiveness of the adopted teaching learning strategies in promoting self learning.
References
- Adalbert G. S. R., Jignesh M. P, and Richard H (2018). Is More Active Always Better for Teaching Introductory Programming? Proceedings of IEEE Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE).
- Astrachan, O. L., Duvall, R. C., Forbes, J. and Rodger, S. H., (2002) Active Learning in Small to Large Courses, Proceedings of the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.
- Briggs, T (2005), Techniques for active learning in CS courses, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21(2), 156-165.
- Gottfried, Byron S. (1997) Teaching computer programming effectively using active learning. Proceedings of American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference.
- Bullard,Felder, R. M and Raubenheimer, M. (2008) Effects of ActiveLearning on Student Performance and Retention. ASEE AnnualConference Proceedings, ASEE, June 2008.
- Duffany, J. L. (2017) Application of Active Learning Techniques to the Teaching of Introductory Programming,IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 12(1), 62-69.
- M. Ebert, (2017), Increase active learning in programming courses, Proceedings of the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 848-851. doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7942946
- Felder, R. M and Brent R. (2009) Active Learning: An Introduction. ASQ Higher Education Brief, 2(4), August 2009.
- Hake, R. R. (1998) Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, American journal of Physics, 66(64).
- Mart�nez, C.L., & Mu�oz, M. (2014). ADPT: An active learning method for a programming lab course.Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference
- Zimudzi, E. (2012). Active learning for problem solving in programming in a computer studies method course, Academic Research International, 3 (2), 284-292.
