Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

DOI: 10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i0/157166

Year: 2020, Volume: 34, Issue: Special Issue, Pages: 348-355

Original Article

Choice of Engineering Education among Girls in India � The Journey so Far

Geethalakshmi P. M. 1*, Sumam David S. 2, Vinod V. Thomas 3
  • Research Scholar, Department of Humanities & Management, MIT, MAHE Manipal, Karnataka, India
  • Professor, Department of E&C, NITK Surathkal, Karnataka, India
  • Professor, Department of E&E, MIT, MAHE Manipal, Karnataka, India
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Abstract: Gender disparity in engineering enrolment is quite significant although there is only a very narrow gap in girls� enrollment in higher education in India. The overall enrolment of girls in engineering programs is 27.5%. By affirmative action of introducing supernumerary quota for girls, Ministry of Education targets to increase the enrolment of girls which was 8% and 14% respectively in IITs and NITs in 2016-17 to 20% in 2020-21. Therefore, it is essential to explore the reasons behind the reluctance of girls in choosing engineering education, even when the nature of engineering jobs has evolved to be gender neutral. It is even more significant now when National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 is targeting to achieve a Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) of 50 % by 2035 from the current 27%. This paper reviews the existing studies to understand the nature of influence of both external and internal factors and their interaction on the girls� choice of higher education. Literature review of the research articles for two decades was conducted. It includes both published and unpublished work on the subject. There are no studies conducted nationwide, post 2004 to address the reasons for disproportionate representation of girls in engineering education in India. It is found that the findings are contextual in nature with respect to culture of the society. In, particular, the influence of parental perception influences the association of gender with engineering studies, among the girls. Awareness and exposure of the nature of engineering jobs among parents and the girls can bring in the desired change.

References

  • Annual Reports (2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019) All India Survey on Higher Education.

  • Bakshi, A. J., Gandhi, H. N., Shah, R., & Maru, K. (2012) Influences on career choices as perceived by youth in Mumbai. Indian Journal of Career and Livelihood Planning, 1(1), 7-18.

  • Chavatzia, T. (2017) Cracking the code: Girls� and women's education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM).

  • Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014) Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(3), 75-141.

  • Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., & Hudson, L. (2013) The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex roles, 69(1-2), 58-71.

  • Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014) Girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: STEMing the tide and broadening participation in STEM careers. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 21-29.

  • Debalina Dutta (2017) Cultural Barriers and Familial Resources for Negotiation of Engineering Careers Among Young Women: Relational Dialectics Theory in an Asian Perspective, Journal of Family Communication, 17:4, 338 355.

  • Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010) Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1051-1057.

  • Diekman, A. B., Steinberg, M., Brown, E. R., Belanger, A. L., & Clark, E. K. (2017) A goal congruity model of role entry, engagement, and exit: Understanding communal goal processes in STEM gender gaps. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(2), 142-175.

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wang, M. T. (2016) What motivates females and males to pursue careers in mathematics and science?. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(2), 100-106.

  • Ertl B, Luttenberger S and Paechter M (2017) The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on the Self-Concept of Female Students in STEM Subjects with an Under-Representation of Females. Front. Psychol. 8:703.

  • Escueta, M., Saxena, T., & Aggarwal, V. (2013) Women in Engineering: A comparative study of barriers across Nations. Aspiring Minds. Retrieved March, 2, 2015.

  • Faulkner, W. (2007) Nuts and Bolts and People' Gender Troubled Engineering Identities. Social studies of science, 37(3), 331-356.

  • Fouad, N. A., Chang, W. H., Wan, M., & Singh, R. (2017) Women�s reasons for leaving the engineering field. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 875.

  • Gautam, M. (2015) Gender, Subject Choice and Higher Education in India: Exploring �Choices� and �Constraints� of Women Students. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 12(1), 31-58.

  • Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., & Lock, R. (2016) Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 312-340.

  • Gupta, N. (2019) Analysing gender gap in science: Government of India initiatives. Current Science, 116(11), 1797.

  • Hirschi, A. (2011) Career-choice readiness in adolescence: Developmental trajectories and individual differences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 340-348.

  • Indian Express survey, (2018) Retrieved from https://indianexpress.com/article/education/indian-studentstake more-extra-classes-than-other-countries-survey/

  • Jennifer DeWitt & Louise Archer (2015) Who Aspires to a Science Career? A comparison of survey responses from primary and secondary school students, International Journal of Science Education, 37:13, 2170-2192.

  • Kulturel-Konak, S., D'Allegro, M. L., & Dickinson, S. (2011) Review of gender differences in learning styles: Suggestions for stem education. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 4(3), 9-18.

  • Kurup, A., & Maithreyi, R. (2011) Beyond family and societal attitudes to retain women in science. Current Science, 43-48.

  • Langen, A. V., & Dekkers, H. (2005) Cross?national differences in participating in tertiary science, technology, engineering and mathematics education. Comparative Education, 41(3), 329-350.

  • Louise Archer, Jennifer DeWitt, Jonathan Osborne, Justin Dillon , Beatrice Willis & Billy Wong (2013) �Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous�: primary school girls� and parents� constructions of science aspirations. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21:1,171-194.

  • Mahajan, P., & Suresh, G. (2017) Engineering a woman: Marketing opportunities and challenges in India. American Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 2(1), 11 22.

  • Male, S. A., Bush, M. B., & Murray, K. (2009) Think engineer, think male?. European journal of engineering education, 34(5), 455-464.

  • Maltese, A. V., & Cooper, C. S. (2017) STEM Pathways: Do Men and Women Differ in Why They Enter and Exit?. AERA Open, 3(3), 2332858417727276.

  • Makarova, E., Aeschlimann, B., & Herzog, W. (2019) The gender gap in STEM fields: The impact of the gender stereotype of math and science on secondary students� career aspirations. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 4, p. 60). Frontiers.

  • Mary Ayre, Julie Mills & Judith Gill (2013) �Yes, I do belong�: the women who stay in engineering. Engineering Studies, 5:3, 216-232.

  • Miller, D. I., Eagly, A. H., & Linn, M. C. (2015). Women�s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 631.

  • Mlambo, Y. A., & Mabokela, R. O. (2017) �It's more flexible�: persistence of women engineers in the academy. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(3), 271-285.

  • Morganson, V. J., Jones, M. P., & Major, D. A. (2010) Understanding women's underrepresentation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: The role of social coping. The Career Development Quarterly, 59(2), 169-179.

  • National Institute of Ranking Framework (NIRF) reports, (2016�20) Retrieved from https://www.nirfindia.org/2016 19/EngineeringRanking.html

  • National Education Policy, (2020) Retrieved from https://www.mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/nep/NEP_Final_English.pdf

  • Nye, C. D., Su, R., Rounds, J., & Drasgow, F. (2012) Vocational interests and performance: A quantitative summary of over 60 years of research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 384-403.

  • OECD (2015) Education at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2015-en

  • Oliver, M. C., Woods-McConney, A., Maor, D., & McConney, A. (2017). Female senior secondary physics students� engagement in science: a qualitative study of constructive influences. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1-15.

  • Olmedo-Torre, N., Carracedo, F. S., Ballesteros, M. N. S., L�pez, D., Perez-Poch, A., & L�pez-Beltr�n, M. (2018) Do female motives for enrolling vary according to STEM profile? IEEE Transactions on Education, 61(4), 289-297.

  • Parikh, P. P., Bindu, R., & Sukhatme, S. P. (2003). Job status and career profile of women engineers in India. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(4), 631-638.

  • Salmon, A. (2015) A Complex Formula: Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in Asia. UNESCO Bangkok.

  • Schmidt, F. L. (2011). A theory of sex differences in technical aptitude and some supporting evidence.

  • Perspectives on psychological science, 6(6), 560-573 Shakya, S., & Singh, M. (2013) Career preferences among degree college adolescents in Kanpur City. Studies on Home and Community Science, 7(2), 95-98.

  • Smeding, A. (2012) Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): An investigation of their implicit gender stereotypes and stereotypes� connectedness to math performance. Sex roles, 67(11-12), 617-629.

  • Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018) The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological science, 29(4), 581 593.

  • Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011) STEMing the tide: using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of personality and social psychology, 100(2), 255.

  • Stout, J. G., Grunberg, V. A., & Ito, T. A. (2016). Gender roles and stereotypes about science careers help explain women and men�s science pursuits. Sex Roles, 75(9-10), 490-499.

  • Subramanian, J. (2007) Perceiving and producing merit: gender and doing science in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 14(2), 259-284.

  • Venkatesh, S. (2015) Forms of Social Asymmetry and Cultural Bias: Of Gender and Science in India and the World. Transcience (2015), 6(1).

  • Wall, K. (2010) Engineering: issues, challenges and opportunities for development. UNESCO

  • Wang, M. T., Eccles, J. S., & Kenny, S. (2013) Not lack of ability but more choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological science, 24(5), 770-775.

  • Wehrwein, E. A., Lujan, H. L., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2007) Gender differences in learning style preferences among undergraduate physiology students. Advances in physiology education, 31(2), 153-157.

  • Woetzel, J., Madgavkar, A., Gupta, R., Manyika, J., Ellingrud, K., Gupta, S., & Krishnan, M. (2015) The power of parity: Advancing women�s equality in India. Shanghai, Mumbai, San Francisco, Minneapolis, Gurgaon, Stamford: McKinsey Global Institute.

  • Women in science and technology in Asia - AASSA report, (2015) Retrieved from http://aassa.asia.

  • 10 March 2020
  • VIEWS 2169
  • PDF 1334

Year: 2020, Volume: 34, Issue: Special Issue


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

More articles

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.