Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Year: 2020, Volume: 33, Issue: Special Issue, Pages: 618-625

Original Article

Blended Learning: Exploring New Models for Effective Teaching and Learning

Abstract

Outcome based education is emerging as a paradigm for revising and reorienting teaching/learning approaches. Innovation in content, delivery mechanism and assessment are the major challenges faced by higher educational institutions. Any method devised should enable the development of creative and critical thinking among the students. Chances for long term success can be strengthened by considering various methods. In the context of challenges, the potential of blended learning is discussed. The study aims to examine the impact of the paradigm shift in teaching methodologies empowering the faculty with pedagogical methods and analyses the impact of their implementation. In particular the active learning strategies that were implemented by 80% of the faculty has shown an impact on the improvement of student interest in the subject by 50%.Blending by use of multiple types of instructional methodologies by incorporating technology has transformed students from learners to leaders.

References

  • Six C's for effective teaching - Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Special Issue, eISSN 2394-1707.
  • Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Washington DC
  • Marx, J. D., and K. Cummings. 2007. Normalized change. American Journal of Physics 75:87�91.
  • Felder, R.,2006. Teaching Engineering in the 21st Cent ury witha 12th Century Teaching Model: How Bright is that? Chemical Engineering Education, 40 (2), 110-113.
  • Chu, K.C. & Lai, P., 2002. How engineering students' problem solving skills can be improved? World Transactions on Engineering Technology Education, 1 (1).
  • Wankat and Oreovicz, 1992,Wankat, P.C., & F. S. Oreovicz, (1992). Teaching Engineering, available at: http://dequim.ist.utl.pt/wankat/. Accessed 2011/03/9.
  • Lewis, T. [Ted] (2007). Engineering education in schools. International Journal of Engineering Education, 23(5), 843-852.
  • Fazarro, D. , & Stevens, A. (2004). Topography of Learning Style Preferences of Undergraduate Students in Industrial Technology and Engineering Programs at Historically Black and Predominantly White Institutions. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 41(3),
  • Stauffacher, M., A. Walter, et al. (2006). "Learning to research environmental problems from a functional socio-cultural constructivism perspective: the transdisciplinary case study approach." International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 7(3): 252-275.
  • Milke, M W, C Upton, G F Koorey, and A D O�Sullivan. �Improving the writing of engineering students through portfolios.� ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Atlanta: ASEE, 2013. 13
  • ABET Criteria for Evaluating Engineering Programs, (2007)

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.