Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Year: 2018, Volume: 31, Issue: 3, Pages: 289-294

Original Article

A Structured Approach to Teaching and Learning Robotics

Abstract

Students are not passionate enough about conventional teaching techniques because too often, we hear from students that conventional teaching is boring and that they cannot relate to or understand the course that is presented to them each day in class. Rather than feel disheartened, we need to understand that we have before us both a challenge and an opportunity. Project-based learning (PBL) experiences will help us figure out how to make learning come alive for our engineering students. Project-based learning goes beyond generating student interest. Due to these reasons twenty-first century students are moving towards modern learning approaches rather than conventional learning. This paper presents the conceptual analysis of learning approaches involving use of simulation software, robots and solving real-time problems. Learning can be made more fun and interesting through practical application of concepts. Learning by actual implementation of theoretical concepts, provides students good hands-on and makes them ready for the industry.Result analysis show that performance of the students has improved and also quality of course projects is increased. Thus, we can conclude that students are attracted towards the course and also found to improve their learning skills in the context of course project work.

References

  • Arends (1997), �Classroom instruction and management�,NewYork:McGrawHill.
  • Diehl,W., Grobe, T., Lopez, H., and Cabral, C. (1999), �Project-based learning: A strategy for teaching and learning�,Boston:Center for Youth Development and Education, Corporation for Business,Work, and Learning.
  • Thomas, J.W. (1998), �An Overview of Project based Learning�,Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education.
  • Vinod Kumar V Meti, Arun C Giriyapur, (2015), �A Structured Approach To Teaching And Learning Hydraulics & Pneumatics�, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations , Volume 28 ,No.2&3, ISSN2349-2473.
  • Erica Baker et al., (2011), �Project-based Learning Model Relevant Learning for the 21st Century�,�Pacific Education Institute..
  • Alec Patton, Jeff Robin, (2012) �Work that matters-The teacher's guide to project-based learning,� Published by the Paul hamlyn foundation, isbn: 978-1-905500-07-9.
  • Thomas, J.W. (1998), �Project-based learning: Overview�, Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education.
  • Bransford, J., Brown, A., and Cocking, R. (2000), �How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school�, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • George Lucas Educational Foundation. (2001), �Project-based learning research�, Edutopia. www.edutopia.org.
  • Vinod Kumar V Meti, A. C. Giriyapur, Siddhalingeshwar I. G, Pooja Sadalagi, (2016), �A Systematic Approach to Teaching and Learning Machine Design Course�, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Special Issue, eISSN 2394-1707.
  • Thomas, J.W. (2000), �A review of research on project-based learning�, San Rafael, CA: Autodesk. http: //www.k12reform.org/ foundation/pbl/research.
  • Boaler, J. (1999, March 31), �Mathematics for the moment, or the millennium? Education Week�.
  • Sri International. (2000, January), �Silicon valley challenge 2000:Year 4 Report�, San Jose, CA: Joint Venture, Silicon Valley Network. http://pblmm.k12.ca.us/sri/Reports.htm.
  • Railsback, J. (2002), �Project-based instruction: Creating excitement for learning�, Portland,OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. http://www.nwrel.org/request/2002aug/index.ht ml.

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.