Enhancing Student Engagement and Success in Operating Systems through Simulation based Learning and Formative Assessments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v39is2/26053Keywords:
Simulation-Based Learning; Formative Assessment; Operating Systems Education; Active Learning Strategies; Student Engagement; Conceptual UnderstandingAbstract
Operating Systems is often perceived as a challenging course for many undergraduate IT students because the concepts are abstract, algorithm-heavy, and difficult to visualize. This makes it harder for learners to build strong conceptual connections using traditional lecture-based teaching alone. The gap becomes more visible when students struggle to apply theoretical ideas to real-world scenarios, especially in topics such as CPU scheduling, memory management, and disk operations. To address these limitations, this study implemented a blended instructional approach combining simulation-based learning, module-wise formative quizzes, and problem-driven tutorials for 60 second-semester B.Tech IT students during the 2024–25 academic year. Students designed and experimented with simulators for scheduling, paging, and disk algorithms, while continuous assessments encouraged steady learning throughout the semester. The intervention led to notable improvements in academic performance, including a complete 100% pass rate, higher average marks compared with the previous cohort, and a marked reduction in the number of low-performing students. Student feedback further indicated that simulations made complex algorithms easier to understand, and the regular quizzes helped them stay engaged with the course material. Overall, these findings show that the blended approach not only enhanced understanding but also fostered deeper participation and confidence in learning OS concepts. This study highlights the potential of integrating simulations and formative assessments to strengthen student learning outcomes in algorithm-intensive courses and offers a practical model that can be scaled to similar engineering subjects.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Chen, Q. (2022). Exploration of Method to Improve the Teaching Effect of Course “Operating System.” 2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Educational Technology (ICET), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/icet55642.2022.9944467
Ebling, M. R. (2024). Resources for Teaching Operating Systems: A Survey of Instructors and a Literature Review. ACM Transactions on Computing Education,24(4),1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3688853
Gaziz, G., Bidaibekov, E., Grinshkun, V., & Koneva, S. (2025). Virtual models’ effectiveness in teaching operating systems to future computer science teachers. E-Learning and Digital Media. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530251343206
Hakiki, M., Surjono, H. D., Wagiran, Fadli, R., Budiman, R. D. A., Ramadhani, W., … Hidayah, Y. (2023). Enhancing Practicality of Web-Based Mobile Learning in Operating System Course: A Developmental Study. International Technologies Journal (iJIM), of Interactive 17(19), pp. Mobile 4–19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i19.42389
Parkavi, R., Karthikeyan, P., Sujitha, S., & Abdullah, A. S. (2025). Enhancing Educational Assessment: Predicting and Visualizing Student Performance using EDA and Machine Learning Techniques. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 37, 240-245. Retrieved from https://journaleet.in/index.php/jeet/article/view/2336
Parkavi, R., & Karthikeyan, P. (2025). Enhancing Student Performance Prediction in Higher Education: A Data Driven Approach. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 37, 271–279. Retrieved from https://journaleet.in/index.php/jeet/article/view/2343
Parkavi, R., Karthikeyan, P., & Abdullah, A. S. (2022). Collaborative Learning : A Case Study on Information Security and Auditing Management Course. 2022 International Conference for Advancement in Technology (ICONAT), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/iconat53423.2022.9726091
Parkavi, R., Karthikeyan, P., & Sheik Abdullah, A. (2024). Enhancing personalized learning with explainable AI: A chaotic particle swarm optimization based decision support system. Applied Soft Computing, 156, 111451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111451
R., P., P., K., & A., S. A. (2024). Predicting academic performance of learners with the three domains of learning data using neuro-fuzzy model and machine learning algorithms. Journal of Engineering Research, 12(3), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2023.09.006
Wadmare, J., Kolte, D., Bhatia, K., Desai, P., & Wadmare, G. (2024). Virtual Simulations Tool for Operating Systems: Advancing E-Learning in Computing Education. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 23, 018. https://doi.org/10.28945/5404
Wang, L., Zhen, Z., Wo, T., Jiang, B., Sun, H., & Long, X. (2020). A Scalable Operating System Experiment Platform Supporting Learning Behavior Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Education, 63(3), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1109/te.2020.2975556
Zemanek, P., & Muzikar, Z. (2023). Methodology and Infrastructure for Teaching Operating Systems Courses for Large Number of University Students. 2023 18th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.23919/cisti58278.2023.10212062
Zhang, F., & Zhang, X. (2021). Achievement Degree Evaluation Method of Operating System Course Targets Under the Background of Engineering Education Accreditation. 2021 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Educational Informatization (CSEI), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/csei51395.2021.9477752
Zhou, R., Liu, Y., Sun, L., & Zhu, S. (2025). Enhancing Operating System Education With a Generative AI-Supported Boppps Model: An Empirical Study. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 33(6). Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.70114
Access to login into the old portal (Manuscript Communicator) for Peer Review-

