MAPLE Model: A Blended ARCS-PSIS Approach to Enhance Gen-Z Engagement in Core Engineering Courses

Authors

  • Kendaganna Swamy S. Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics & Instrumentation Engineering, RVCE, Bengaluru
  • Hemanthakumar R. Kappali Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, BITM, Ballari
  • Manjunath G. Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, BITM, Ballari
  • Shilpa K. R. Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, BITM, Ballari
  • Sadyojatha K. M. Professor & Head, Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, BITM, Ballari
  • Rajasree M. Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics & Instrumentation Engineering, RVCE, Bengaluru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v39is2/26029

Keywords:

ARCS Motivational Model; CADENCE Tool; Gen-Z; MAPLE; Peer-learning; VLSI.

Abstract

Gen-Z students often struggle with concentration and engagement in traditional classroom settings, particularly in core engineering courses like Very Large-Scale Integration (VLSI) Design, which are both concept-heavy and abstract. These learners, being digital natives, prefer interactive, collaborative, and application-oriented learning environments. Traditional lecture methods often fail to sustain their attention or motivation. To overcome this challenge, this paper introduces the Motivation-Aligned Peer Learning Environment (MAPLE) Model, a blended pedagogical framework that combines the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction (ARCS) motivational model with Peer-Supported Independent Study (PSIS). The ARCS component enhances theoretical learning by capturing attention, building relevance, and fostering confidence and satisfaction through structured and interactive delivery methods. Meanwhile, the PSIS component empowers students to explore practical applications through peer collaboration, hands-on activities, and independent learning in lab environments. This paper presents the design and implementation of the MAPLE Model in a third-year VLSI Design course and evaluates its effectiveness through quantitative and qualitative analyses. The results demonstrated significant improvements in academic performance, peer collaboration, and overall course satisfaction. This study concludes that the MAPLE Model is a scalable and effective instructional strategy for improving engagement and outcomes in core engineering education for Gen-Z learners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-18

How to Cite

S., K. S., Kappali, H. R., G., M., K. R., S., K. M., S., & M., R. (2026). MAPLE Model: A Blended ARCS-PSIS Approach to Enhance Gen-Z Engagement in Core Engineering Courses. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 39(Special Issue 2), 239–243. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v39is2/26029

Issue

Volume 39, Special Issue 2, January 2026

Section

Articles
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Dawn, Suma. (2013). Multimedia, animation, and computer graphics—Mapping of study of virtual characters to cognitive understanding. 2013 IEEE International Conference in MOOC, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITE.2013.6756309

Felder, R., & Brent, R. (2009). ACTIVE LEARNING: AN INTRODUCTION *. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ACTIVE-LEARNING%3A-AN-INTRODUCTION-*-Felder-Brent/03344eb21083fc486dfcc4e271a60406f36d3161

Ferro, Alana de O., Fontes, Márcilio B., Mota, Denisia de V., Texeira, Vanessa S. de C., & Moreira, Adson B. (2025). Team-Based Learning in Electrical Engineering Classes. Eletrônica de Potência, 30, e202518. https://doi.org/10.18618/REP.e202518

Gamson, Zelda F. (1991). A brief history of the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1991(47), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219914703

Hora, Matthew Tadashi, & Ferrare, Joseph J. (2013). Instructional Systems of Practice: A Multidimensional Analysis of Math and Science Undergraduate Course Planning and Classroom Teaching. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(2), 212–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2012.729767

Huang, Lei. (2019). Integrating Machine Learning to Undergraduate Engineering Curricula Through Project-Based Learning. 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028688

Kaveri, Anitha, Gunasekar, Sangeetha, Gupta, Deepak, & Pratap, Maheshwar. (2016). Decoding Engagement in MOOCs: An Indian Learner Perspective. 2016 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2016.027

Keller, John M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780

Madhavi, Kalasapati Bindu, Mosherani, Velicharla, & Anadakumar, Annavarapu. (2024). Empowering Engineering Ethics: Integrating Project-Based Learning for Holistic Student Development in VLSI Education. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 127–132.

Meegahapola, Lasantha Gunaruwan, & Thilakarathne, Chathura. (2019). Dynamic Learner-Assisted Interactive Learning Tools for Power Systems Engineering Courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2018.2889621

Prasad, K., & Goel, A. (1993). Preparing Engineers to meet the Challenges of the 21th Century through VLSI Education. The Sixth International Conference on VLSI Design, 114–117. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVD.1993.669659

Prensky, Marc. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 2: Do They Really Think Differently? On the Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures, 9(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843

Richardson, Jennifer C., & Swan, Karen. (2003). EXAMINING SOCIAL PRESENCE IN ONLINE COURSES IN RELATION TO STUDENTS’ PERCEIVED LEARNING AND SATISFACTION. Online Learning, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v7i1.1864

Sandoval-Lucero, Elena, Blasius, Eileen, Klingsmith, Libby, & Waite, Cheryl. (n.d.). ERIC - EJ1081518—Student-Initiated Study Groups for STEM Classes in Community College Settings, Higher Education Studies, 2012-Ju. Retrieved August 11, 2025, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1081518

Topping, Keith J. (2005). Trends in Peer Learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172

Webb, Noreen M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1