Design and Validation of the Academic Research Aptitude Scale

Authors

  • Jain Mathew School of Business and Management, Christ, Banglore, Karnataka
  • N. Elangovan
  • Sridevi Nair
  • Sheeba Bhaskar
  • Preksha Yadav

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2022/v35i4/22114

Keywords:

Researchers, Research Scholars, Academics, India.

Abstract

:Universities across the world have now started focusing on creating and nurturing academic researchers. While the importance and benefits of a strong research mindset have been understood, the process of identifying and developing researchers lacks a sense of structure. The current study attempts at filling this gap by proposing and testing the Academic Research Aptitude Scale. The scale was created and tested using the DeVellis (2016) method. The initial pool of items consisted of 29 items that were generated in the course of a brainstorming session. The discussion with experts and literature review resulted in a 22-item instrument which was then reduced to 21 items, post the item analysis. The analysis was carried out on a sample of 303 research scholars and researchers. The exploratory factor analysis helped in the identification of the dimensions and the same was then checked using confirmatory factor analysis. The scale fulfilled the validity requirements and showed high reliability, as shown by Cronbach's alpha score. The final scale consists of 21 items.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-01

How to Cite

Mathew, J., Elangovan, N., Nair, S., Bhaskar, S., & Yadav, P. (2022). Design and Validation of the Academic Research Aptitude Scale. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 148–156. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2022/v35i4/22114

Issue

Section

Original Article

References

Bass, B.M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.

Berlyne, D. E. (1954). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 45(3), 180-191.

DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). Sage publications.

Doyle, A (2019). The Balance Careers. Retrieved 22 February 2020, from https://www.thebalancecareers.com/analyti cal-skills-list-2063729

Dweck, C. S. & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological review, 95(2), 256.

Ebert, R. J., Griffin, R. W., Starke, F. A., & Dracopoulos, G. (2011). Business essentials. NJ: Prentice Hall.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.

Goleman, D., Davidson, R. J., Boyatzis, R. E., Kohlrieser, G., & Druskat, V. U. (2017). Emotional self-awareness: A primer. More Than Sound LLC.

Goleman, D. (1998). What makes a great leader. Harvard Business Review Nov/Dec.

Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. The American economic review, 957-970.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling.

Montessori, M. (2013). The montessori method. Transaction publishers.

Research competencies framework (2007). Retrieved from London, United Kingdom: https://www.fgdp.org.uk/files/docs/in-practice/Research/research%20comtetencies.pdf.

Rumman, A. & Alheet, A. F. (2019), The Role of Researcher Competencies in Delivering Successful Research, Information and Knowledge Management, 9(1), 29

Showman, A., Cat, L. A., Cook, J., Holloway, N., & Wittman, T. (2013). Five essential skills for every undergraduate researcher. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 33(3), 16-21.

Shyamamala, W. S., Oh, J., Cho, H., & Im, M. (2021). Development and Validation of a Self-Efficacy Scale for Nursing Educators' Role in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), 7773.

Zuss, M. (2012) The Practice of Theoretical Curiosity. New York, N.Y.: Springer Publishing