Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Year: 2018, Volume: 32, Issue: 2, Pages: 46-54

Original Article

Performance Management and Turnaround Mechanism of Poorly Performing Institutes

Abstract

Performance management is a continuous and systematic process that allows an institute (an engineering college/ university) to ensure efficiency in rendering institutional vision and mission. The process involves college, departments, and faculty entitles planning educational programs and academic services based on the needs of employers and students. To achieve these, the colleges must recruit outstanding faculty, developing institutional goals based on the vision, andmission. This can be achieved through training and by developing the faculty, empowering the colleges and departments, monitoring the development process, auditing the outcome, evaluating the performance of the faculty and diagnosing the causes for shortfalls, implementing interventions like firefighting so that the loss of resources can be minimized. This study is based on the brainstorming sessions with thirty small groups of heads of departments from thirty-six engineering and polytechnic colleges over a period of five years. The groups have identified the problems faced by them in planning industry- relevant programs, establishing consultancy centers, planning in-house faculty development centers, planning state level seminars and industrial training programs for the students. The outcomes are creating a learning institute, engaging the faculty, establishing in-house faculty development units, formulating the process of undertaking consultancy projects, establishing academic council, following appreciative appraisal of the faculty performance, decentralization of administration of the departments, empowering the star performing faculty members, and introducing firefighting mechanism to correct the deviations in achievements.Also, the recruitments should be based the excellent achievement of the candidates.All these form the basis of learning institution which comprises of system thinking, personal mastery, mental models. shared vision and team learning.

References

  • A p p r e c i a t i v e E n q u i r y , h t t p s : / / appreciativeinquiry.chaplain.edu/learn/appreciat ive-inquiry-introduction/
  • Chase Larry (1983)Quality Circles in Education. Edu c at iona l Le ade r ship , 40 (5) 1 8, https://www.connection.ebscohost.com/c/article s/8517830/
  • Chawla, Sarita and Renesch, John (1995) LearningOrganizations:Developing Cultures for Tomorrow's Workplace, Portland, OR: Productivity Press
  • Colleen Flaherty (2015) Going Through the Motions? The 2015 Survey of FacultyWorkplace E n g a g e m e n t , https://www.insidehighered.com/news/survey/g oing-through-motions-2015-survey-facultyworkplaceengagement
  • eprints.lse.ac.uk/25304/Designing-EffectiveReward-System.pdf
  • ERIC-Quality Circles in Education, Final R e p o r t - 1 9 8 3 J u n e , https://eric.ed.gov?/id=ED231479
  • Faculty Reward SystemofOhio StateUniversity, https://oaa.osu.edu/assests/files/documents/facu ltyrewardsystem.031809.pdf
  • NPIU-TEQIP-Phase II, Guidance Brief- Improving the Academic Performance of Weak Students through Equity Action Plan, www.npiu.nic.in/PDF/1%20P%20W%20S.pdf
  • O'Keeffe,T (2002) Organizational Learning: a new perspective-Journal of European Industrial Training, 26(2), 130-141.
  • Office of School Improvement, Georgia Department of Education, Low Achieving S c h o o l s - I n t e r v e n t i o n M o d e l s , www.gade.org/Race-to-thetop/pages/TurningAround-Lowest-Achieving-Schools.aspx
  • Pascarella, E.T and Terenzini, P.T (2005) How college affects students:Vol.2 Adecade of Research, San Francisco:JohnWiley&Sons, Inc.
  • Pedler, M., Burgogyne, J. and Boydell, T (1997) The Learning Company: A strategy for sustainable development, 2nd Ed. London, McGraw-Hill.
  • Peter Senge. M (1990) The Fifth Discipline, London:CenturyBusiness
  • St a at s , Elmer.B (1976) Per formance Management in Higher Education, NACUBO Professional File v8 n 5. ERIC,Washington D.C ,https://eric.ed.gov?id=ED131824
  • www.protectingeducation.org/sites/default/ files/documents/institutional-autonomy-andprotection.pdf
  • CV of the Author
  • Thanikachalam Vedhathiri, B.E. (1968, Civil Eng. Univ. of Madras), M. Tech., (1970, Soil Mech., & Foundation Eng. IIT Madras), Ph.D., (1975, Civil Eng., Univ. of Madras), M.S. (Instructional SystemTechnology, IndianaUniv., Bloomington, USA), FIGS, FIE, FFIUCEE, Former Fulbright Scholar, Former Programme Executive Continuing Education., Founder Professor ofM.Tech (HRD).Guided 18 Research Scholars for Interdisciplinary Ph.D. in EngineeringEducation.

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.