Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

DOI: 10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i0/157102

Year: 2020, Volume: 34, Issue: Special Issue, Pages: 22-37

Original Article

Leveraging Government Initiatives through Facilitating the Newly Recruited Faculty Members in Engineering

Thanikachalam Vedhathiri *
  • Former Professor, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research, Chennai, India
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Under the fast-changing disruptive technologies and fierce global competitions, employers are looking for industry-ready graduates with excellent attributes and innovative skills to develop state-of-art products and replace them periodically with superior products to get the lions� share of global markets. This is possible only if the institutes focus their efforts to develop outstanding faculty members. National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 provides a guideline to develop Indian Education to innovate in all spheres. In the last fifty years, there were many faculty development efforts, but none of them provided long-term impact. A study has been taken on the following issues: 1). Flawless Recruitment Process, 2). Planning and Conducting Orientation Programs, 3). Attaching them with Dedicated Mentors, 4). Planning and Implementing Continuous Professional Development Programs, 5). Conducting Appreciative Inquires and Follow up 6). Encouraging them to Undergo Advanced Research and Development Programs in the Research Universities. 7). Encouraging and Inducting them into the Ongoing Consultancy Projects, 8). Training them to Establish Interdisciplinary Graduate and Postgraduate Research and Programs, 9). Training and Inducting them in Planning and Conducting State, Regional, National, and International Conferences/ Seminars/Symposia, 10). Assessing their Performance and Implementing Recognition Systems for Outstanding Accomplishments, 11). Encouraging them in Planning and Implementing Diverse Global Faculty Development, 12). Facilitating them in planning Institute-Institute Collaboration, and 13.) Mentoring them to reach Higher Academic Cadres. The management should cultivate a culture of supporting and rewarding the best practices which will enable the growth of the graduates and the institute. The research on creating, supporting, and rewarding the promising newly recruited-faculty members has become essential not only to retain them but also, to serve the industries to reach national and global standards with needed human capital and technical support. The current National Educational Policy 2020 of India also focuses on these aspects, but the institutes have yet to refine their recruitment and rewarding best faculty members. This research suggests low-cost but high yielding human resource management practices to sustain the innovations in higher education and to support the knowledge-based Indian economy.

References

  • Abouelenein, Yousri Attia Mohamed. (2016). Training Needs of Faculty Members: Towards Achieving Quality of University Education in the Light of Technological Innovations. Educational Research and Reviews.11(13):1180-1193. DOI:10.5897/ERR2015.2377 https://files.eric/fultext/EJ1106283

  • All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). (2020). Research and Innovations Development Schemes. New Delhi. http://aicteindia.org/schemes/research-innovationsdevelopment schemes

  • AICTE. (2017). A Comprehensive Training Policy for Technical Education. New Delhi.

  • Ashlee McGandy. (2020). Twenty new Engaged Faculty Fellows named. Cornell Chronicle. https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2020/09/twenty -new-engaged-faculty-fellows-named

  • Anne Marie Canale, Cheryl Herdklotz, and Lynn Wild. (2014). Inspiring a Culture of Appreciation @ RIT. Wallace Center- Faculty Career Development Services. Retrieved from: https://rit.edu/academicaffairs/sites/rit.edu.acad emicaffairs/files/docs/fcds_appre

  • Barry M. Staw. (1983). Motivation Research Versus the Art of Faculty Management. The Review of Higher Education, 6(4). 301-321.

  • Basham, Patrick. (1999). Let Marketplace Determine Pay. Winnipeg Free Press. October 25

  • Bercuson, David et al. (1984). The Great Brain Robbery: Canada�s Universities on the Road to Ruin. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.

  • Boyer, Ernest L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Principles of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for Advancement of Teaching.

  • Christina Wood. (2018). Mastering the Art of Employee Recognition: 9 Things You Can Do Right Now. Retrieved from: http://cio.com/article/3319498/mastering-the art-of-employee-based- Approach.

  • Clifton, Rodney A. and Hymie Rubenstein. (1998). Improving University Teaching: A Performance-Based Approach. Policy Options 19(5):36-39.

  • Coimbatore Institute of Technology (2019) Faculty Induction Program. Under Teaching Learning Center (under Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya National Mission on Teachers and Teaching Scheme. Dept. of Higher Education, MHRD. GOI.)

  • Community Tool Box. Section 6. Developing Staff Orienting Programs

  • Dana Hammer, et al. (2010). Recognition of Teaching Excellence. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 74(9) 164-178. Doi:10.5688/aj7409164 Retrieved from: https://ncb.nlm/pmc/articles/PMC2996754

  • Daniel Druhora. (2017). Students turn to Engineering Diplomacy to Solve 21st Century Grand Challenges. USC Viterbi. https://Viterbischool.Use.Edu/Author/Druhora/

  • Education World. Recognizing the Stars on Your Staff. Retrieved from: https://educationworld.com/a_admin538.shtml

  • Faculty of Engineering. (2019). Industry Partnership and Commercialization. London: Imperial College. https://imperial.ac.uk/engineering/industrypartnership and-commercialization/

  • Gujarat Technology University. (2019). GTU&AICTE Sponsored Faculty Development Program on INDUCTION TRAINING for Newly Recruited Faculties. Ahmedabad- GTU 19. Harvard University. Faculty of Arts and Science. Recognizing and Rewarding your Staff. Retrieved from: http://hr.fas.harvard.edu/recognition.

  • Human Resources Department. Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Recognizing and Rewarding Your Staff. Retrieved from: https://hr.fas.harvard.edu/recognition

  • Hymie Rubenstein. (2000). Rewarding University Professors: A Performance-Based Approach. A Fraser Institute Occasional Paper, Public Policy Sources, No. 44. Retrieved from: https://fraserinstitute.org/default/files/Rewardin gUniversityProfessor.pdf

  • Industrial Research & Development Unit (IRD). (2009). General Information on Sponsored Research Projects & Consultancy Jobs. New Delhi: Indian Institute of Technology.

  • Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. (2014). Handbook. http://iitb.ac.in/sites/default/files/Faculty Handbook-2014.pdf

  • Ite Joya Misra and Jennifer Lundquist. (2016). Making a Difference through Public Engagement. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from://insidehighered.com/2016/11/10/importa nce-university-recognition-faculty

  • International Engineering Alliance. (2013). Graduate Attributes and Professional Competencies. Version 3:21 June 2013. https://www.ieagreements.org/assets/uploads/D ocuments-Attributes-and-Professional-Competencies

  • Jeffrey Bodimer. (2019). Use Training and Development to Motivate Staff. https://thebalancecareers.com/use-training-anddevelopment to-staff-197833

  • Lynn F. Jacobs and Jeremy S. Hyman. (2009). 10 Tips for Success for Engineering Students. US News Education, http://www.usnews.com/education/blogs/profes sor-guide/

  • Mark Crawford. (2012). 9 Self-Improvement Strategies for Engineers. ASME.org. https://www.asme.org/topicsresources/content/9-selfimprovementstragegies-for-engineers

  • Michael Armstrong and Helen Murlis. (2008). Reward Management. A Handbook of Remuneration Strategy Practice, Revised 5th Edition, New Delhi: Kogan Page India Ltd.

  • Mona Holmquist. (2019). Lack of Qualified Teachers: A Global Challenge for Future Knowledge Development. Intech Open. p 1-13.

  • Mohan Reddy B.V.R. (2019). Engineering Education in India-Short and Medium-Term Prospection. https://aicte-India.org/default/files/Short%20Term%20and %Medium%20Term%20Rep

  • NAE Grand Challenges (2006). Engineering for the Developing World

  • National Educational Policy 2019 (Draft), New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource Development

  • National Institute for Digital Learning (2019). Consultancy Services. http://www.dcu.ie/nidl/

  • National Institute of Technical Teachers� Training and Research, Bhopal. (2018). Employees their Power, Duties. Manual-II. https://nitttrbpl.ac.in/index.php/manual-ii

  • National Science Foundation. (2020). Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) in Engineering and Computer Science. USA

  • O�meara, K. (2002). Uncovering the Values in Faculty Evaluation of Services as Scholarship. Review of Higher Education. 26(1), 57-80. Retrieves from http://search.provost.com.ezproxy.rit.edu/docvi ew/62201956?accountid=108

  • Ohio State University. Principles of Faculty Reward Systems in a High- Performanc Academic Culture. Retrieved from:

  • http://oaa.osu.edu/assets/files/documents/facult yrewardsystems031809.pdf

  • Osmania University- Centre for Professional Advancement & Continuing Education [CPACE] .(2014). Induction Programme for the Newly-recruited Faculty Members. Hyderabad: UGC Unit, Osmania University.

  • Phil Rabinowitz. (2018). Developing a Plan for Staff Hiring and Training. Section 1. Community Tool Box. https://www.ctb.ku.edu/en/table -ofcontents/ structure/hiring-and-training/developa plan/main

  • Riordan, C. (2013). Foster a culture of gratitude. HBR Blog Network. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: http://blogs.hbr.org/2013/04/foster-a-cultutreof gratitude/

  • Roberts, K., and Yarrish., J. (2008). Strategies for Improving Faculty Morale and Elevating Performance. University Leadership Council. Education Advisory Board (EAB).

  • Rubenstein, Hymie, and Rodney A. Clinton. (1998). A New Approach to Tenure and Scholarship. University Affairs 39(5):23-24

  • Sarah El-Mallah and Tonia Dousay. (2019). Encouraging Faculty Adoption of Virtual Reality Tools in Engineering Education. https://journals.uair.edu/index.php/itet/article/vi ew/23147/22274

  • The Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education Survey. Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey. (2013). Provost�s Report. Rochester Institute of Technology. Retrieved from: https://www.rit.edu/provost/files/coache_provost_ report_2013.pdf.

  • The National Academic Press Open Book. (2004). Attributes of Engineering in 2020. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Chapter: 4 NAP.edu/10766. https://www.nap.edu/read/10999/chapter6

  • Veronica Diez, PB Garrett. ED Kinley, John Moore, and Celeste Schwartz. (2009). Faculty Development for the 21st Century. Educause Review. 44(3):46-55

  • 10 March 2020
  • VIEWS 1684
  • PDF 976

Year: 2020, Volume: 34, Issue: Special Issue


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

More articles

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.