S. Julius Fusic
1*,
M. Rishwana
1,
P. R. K. Swathilakshmi
1,
D. Kavitha
2
- Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai, India
- Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai, India
Abstract
The older system of education depends only on the theory, which could lag the students to understand the concept properly. So, they feel hard to apply it in their daily life. The introduction of CDIO syllabus helps the students in the application of concepts and also motivates them to do the hands on model. The way of assessment is done through Bloom's taxonomy and Rubric's Tool. There are four common types of assessment that are being used in today life. They are formative, bench mark, diagnostic and summative. They all serve instinct purposes and should work together in order to make up a comprehensive or balanced assessment program. TCEians follow CDIO education system, as to make the students concentrate in both theory and practical. The CDIO stands for Conceive Design, Implement, operate. The initiative created made the education framework that drive engineering fundamentals set in the context of conceiving, designing, implementing and operating real-world systems and products. The CDIO based education approach uses active learning tools, such as group projects and problem-based learning, to better equip engineering students with technical knowledge as well as communication and professional skills. This system also helps the poor students to come up with their latent (inbuilt) ability.
References
- Wynne Harlen and Mary James (1997) "Assessment and Learning: differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment", Scottish council for research in education, 4:3, 365-379.
- Eleanor Hawe and Helen Dixon (2016) "Assessment for learning: a catalyst for students self regulation", Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 10.1080.
- William L.Sanders and Sandra P Horn(1998) "Implication for Educational Evaluation and Research",,University of Tennessee Value added research and Assessment Centre, Vol 12:3, 247-256.
- Kovanovi'c, V., Ga�evi'c, D., Hatala, M., & Siemens, G. (2017). "A novel model of cognitive presence assessment using automated learning analytics methods" SRI Education.
- David J. Nicol & Debra Macfarlane?Dick (2006): "Assessment and Its learning": Studies in Higher Education, 31:2, 199-218.
- Rosemary Luckin, Wilma Clark, Katerina Avramides, Jade Hunter & Marti Oliver (2016):" TI to support technology-enhanced formative assessment": a review of the literature to inform a new method, Interactive Learning Environments.
- S. Julius Fusic; N. Anandh; I. Leando; M. Manimegalan, (2018) "Peer Teaching Among UG Students", IEEE Tenth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E).
- Newman, Isadore and Ridenour,Carolyn (1998) "Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods": Exploring the interactive Continum, Educational Leadership faculty publication.
- Mike Mimirinis (2018) "Qualitative differences in academics "concepts of e-assessment, & Evaluation in Higher Education.
- Daniela Feistauer & Tobias Richter (2016): How reliable are students �evaluations of teaching quality?
- A variance components approach, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.
