Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Year: 2020, Volume: 33, Issue: Special Issue, Pages: 170-174

Original Article

Evaluating the Quality of Final Examination Question Paper in Engineering Education

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a downtrend in the pass percentage of UG Engineering Mathematics papers among students. Students find it difficult to score pass marks in the subject in the recent batches. Factors like lack of understanding in basic concepts, lack of quality of teaching, lack of quality in question papers, strict evaluation, and so on may be related to poor performance of students. Hence, it becomes necessary to examine the nature of final examination question papers, especially for the maths courses. It is essential to assess the type of questions asked in the examinations using the statistical techniques and measures. In this paper, the descriptive study has been made to evaluate the quality of question papers of Mathematics with the result data.

References

  • Adam Hayes, "Coefficient of Variation", https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/coefficientofvariation.asp, 2019 [accessed on Aug 2019].
  • Ajithkumar, N. S. (2011) Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of a Question Paper. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 3(1), 59-64.
  • Arthur, J. S. (2010) Evaluation of Final Examination Papers in Engineering: a case study using Bloom's Taxonomy, IEEE Transactions on Education, 53(2), 257-264.
  • Das Mandal, S. K. Overview of Assessment and Evaluation, Centre for Educational Technology, IIT Kharagpur. [accessed on June 2019].
  • Ganeshkumar, N., Mohanram, P. and Rudramoorthy, R. (2013) A Case study on Quality of Setting up Engineering Question Papers, International Journal of Educational Science and Research, 3 (1), 145-152.
  • Gul-Ar, N. K., Nazia, I. and Abdul, Q. K. (2015) Using Item analysis on essay type questions given in summative examination of medical college students: facility value, discrimination index, International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 3(1), 178-182.
  • Hasan, A. B., Abdul, F. A., and Selamat, Z. (2017) Effectiveness of mathematics education in secondary schoolsto meet the local universities missions in producing quality engineering and science undergraduates, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 298.
  • Himmah, W. I, Nayazik, A and Setyawan, F. (2019) Revised Bloom's taxonomy to analyze the final mathematics examination problems in Junior High School, Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1188.
  • Jain, N. K., Rachana Garg and Sahu, A. K. (2018) Guidelines for setting Good Quality Question Papers, Delhi Technological University [accessed on Nov 2019]
  • Kashefi, H., Ismail, Z. and Yusof, Y. M. (2012) Engineering Mathematics Obstacles and Improvement: A comparative study of students and lecturers perspectives through creating problem solving, Proceedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 556-564.
  • Ragu Raman, A. (2019) �Tough' maths: Only 25% 1st year engineering students in TamilNadu clear exams, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/69420474.c ms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&ut m_campaign=cppst, [accessed on 2-Sept-2019]
  • Serpil, Neidet and Murat, D. S. (2016) Analysis of the Difficulty and Discrimination Indices of Multiple-Choice QuestionsAccording to Cognitive Levels in an Open and Distance Learning Context, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(4), 16-24.
  • Sowmya, N. and Adithan, M. (2015) Analysis of Question Papers in Engineering Courses with Respect to Hots, American Journal of Engineering Education, 6 (1).

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.