Hemlata Vivek Gaikwad
1*,
Sushma Kulkarni
1,
Suruchi Pandey
2
- Rajarambapu Institute of Technology, Islampur, Maharashtra, India
- Symbiosis Institute of Management Studies, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Abstract
This paper aims to find the impact of a program named �Shardanyas� (meaning charitable organization of the goddess of knowledge) consisting of technical and non- technical events and special soft skill development programs on the performance of women pursuing technical programs. The paper opted for an exploratory study using both closed ended and open-ended approach consisting of 251 women students participating. In-depth interviews were conducted for 15 top performing students. The academic and extra-curricular performance of students were measured every six months after implementing the program. The data was complemented by the feedbacks received from recruiting agencies also. The initial analysis shows statistically significant improvement over two years, in performance of female students, unlike male students, validating efficacy of the interventions. The program catalyzed acquisition of skills such as communication and public speaking skills, and leadership and management skills, as well as improvement in semester grade points of women students, which can augur well for the students� professional excellence. The experiment was carried out at an institution and needs to repeat at multiple institutions to validate the findings. The work presented can help fellow educators to develop appropriate co- curricular programs that can pave the way to professional success of women students. Technical colleges and professions have been globally facing gender disparity. Researchers have identified the major reasons for the disparity in colleges as �leaky pipeline� and �chilly climate� The study fulfils this identified need to improve the performance of women technical graduates.
References
- Friedman, S., Still a "stalled revolution"? Work/family experiences, hegemonic masculinity, and
- moving toward gender equality. Sociology Compass, 2015. 9(2): p. 140-155.
- Fouad, N.A., et al., Women�s Reasons for Leaving the Engineering Field. Frontiers in psychology, 2017. 8: p. 875.
- Hewlett, S.A., et al., The Athena factor: Reversing the brain drain in science, engineering, and technology. Harvard Business Review Research Report, 2008. 10094: p. 1-100.
- Xie, Y., K.A. Shauman, and K.A. Shauman, Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Vol. 26. 2003: Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA.
- Hawks, B.K. and J.Z. Spade, Women and men engineering students: Anticipation of family and work roles. Journal of Engineering Education, 1998. 87(3): p. 249-256.
- Randsad. Diversity in engineering in 2017. 2017 [cited 2018 ]; Available from: https://www.randstad.com/workforce-insights/workforce360/archives/diversity-in-engineering-in-2017_157/.
- Nagpal, M. Women in tech: There are 3 times more male engineers to females. 2017; Available from: https://community.nasscom.in/community/discuss/dni/blog/2017/09/08/women-in-tech-there-are-3-times-more-male-engineers-to-females.
- Zenger, J. and J. Folkman, A study in leadership: Women do it better than men. Orem, Utah: Zenger Folkman Inc, 2012.
- Collis, A., The case for change: why engineering needs more women, in The Guardian. 2013.
- Matthews, V., Why we need more female engineers, in The telegraph. 2017.
- WEF, W.E.f. The Industry Gender Gap - Women and Work in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. 2016; Available from: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_FOJ_Executive_Summary_GenderGap.pdf.
- Martin, J.P., D.R. Simmons, and S.L. Yu, The role of social capital in the experiences of Hispanic women engineering majors. Journal of Engineering Education, 2013. 102(2): p. 227-243.
- Joseph, N.A., Exploring the relationship between extracurricular participation & probability of employment for high school graduates. 2009: Georgetown University. moving toward gender equality. Sociology Compass, 2015. 9(2): p. 140-155.
- Hattie, J., Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. 2008: Routledge.
- Camp, W.G., Participation in student activities and achievement: A covariance structural analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 1990. 83(5): p. 272-278.
- Hall, E.M., Integration: Helping to get our kids moving and learning. Physical educator, 2007. 64(3): p. 123.
- Lynott, F.J., Integrating other subject matter without jeopardizing physical education goals: The content linkage approach. Strategies, 2008. 22(1): p. 10-17.
- Waychal, P., J. Patil, and P. Deore, Determinants of Professional Excellence of Engineering Graduates ďż˝ An Empirical Study. 2015, ASEE Conferences: Seattle, Washington.
- Wang, J. and J. Shiveley, The impact of extracurricular activity on student academic performance. Retrieved May, 2009. 5: p. 2010.
- Murphy, T.J., et al., Achieving parity of the sexes at the undergraduate level: A study of success. Journal of Engineering Education, 2007. 96(3): p. 241-252.
- Walden, S.E. and C. Foor, "What's to keep you from dropping out?" Student Immigration into and within Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 2008. 97(2): p. 191-205.
- Felder, R.M., et al., A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention. III. Gender differences in student performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 1995. 84(2): p. 151-163.
- Johnson, M.J. and S.D. Sheppard, Relationships between engineering student and faculty demographics and stakeholders working to affect change. Journal of Engineering Education, 2004. 93(2): p. 139.
- Raelin, J.A., et al., The gendered effect of cooperative education, contextual support, and self?efficacy on undergraduate retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 2014. 103(4): p. 599-624.
- Hansen, M.T. and J. Birkinshaw, The innovation value chain. Harvard business review, 2007. 85(6): p. 121.
