Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Year: 2020, Volume: 34, Issue: Special Issue, Pages: 752-756

Original Article

Disruptive Teaching Methodology for STEM Education

Abstract

Innovative teaching methodologies are of prime interest in the current evolving education sector to improve the student learning experiences. This paper talks about an attempt on implementing a new disruptive teaching methodology based on COMSOL Applications as a teaching aid for the Computational Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (based on Transport Phenomena course) at BITS Pilani Goa Campus. This study showcased the fact that such teaching methods aid students to gain a deeper understanding of a concept and assist them in retaining the knowledge rather than just memorizing formulas. Implementation and evaluation of this new teaching methodology are discussed.

References

  • C. Bonwell, J. Eison, Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports., 1991.
  • R.M. Felder, A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. IV. Instructional Methods, J. Eng. Educ. 84 (1995) 361�367.
  • R.R. Hake, Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A sixthousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, Am. J. Phys. 66 (1998) 64�74.
  • National Research Council, America�s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science, S. R. Singer, M. L. Hilton, H. A. Schweingruber, Eds. (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2006).
  • A.A. Deshpande, S.H. Huang, Simulation games in engineering education: A state-of-the-art review, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 19 (2011) 399�410.
  • P. McClean, B. Saini-Eidukat, D. Schwert, B. Slator, and A. White, In: J. A. Chamber (Ed.), Virtual worlds in large enrollment science classes significantly improve authentic learning, Selected Papers from the 12th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning, Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning, Jacksonville, FL, 2001, pp 111�118.
  • K. Squire, Video games in education, Int J Intell Games Simul 2 (2003), 49�62.
  • K. Squire, M. Barnett, J. M. Grant, and T. Higginbotham, Electromagnetism supercharged! Learning physics with digital simulation games, in Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference of the Learning Sciences, UCLA Press, LA, 2004.
  • Z. C. Zacharia, C. P. Constantinou, Comparing the influence of physical and virtual manipulatives in the context of the Physics by Inquiry curriculum: The case of undergraduate students� conceptual understanding of heat and temperature, Am. J. Phys. 76, 425 (2008).
  • T. Jaakkola, S. Nurmi, K. Veermans, A comparison of students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulation?laboratory contexts, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 48, 71 (2011).
  • Z. H. Zhang, M. C. Linn, Can generating representations enhance learning with dynamic visualizations?, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 48, 1177 (2011).
  • L. Deslauriers, C. E. Wieman, Learning and retention of quantum concepts with different teaching methods, Phys. Rev. Spec. Topics Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 010101 (2011).
  • K. W. McElhaney, M. C. Linn, Investigations of a complex, realistic task: Intentional, unsystematic, and exhaustive experimenters, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 48, 745 (2011).

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.