Radeep Krishna Radhakrishnan Nair
1,
Nagaraj Ramrao
1*,
Sivapragasam Chandrasekaran
2,
Anish Nair
3,
Sivakumar Pothiraj
1
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Kalasalingam Academy of Research And Education, Krishnankoil, India
- Department of Civil Engineering, Kalasalingam Academy of Research And Education, Krishnankoil, India
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kalasalingam Academy of Research And Education, Krishnankoil, India
Abstract
The mobile learning paradigm has significantly started influencing the global education sector, the outcome of which has reflected in the increased usage of mobile for learning by the students for online classrooms. Further, there is a need to better understand as well as individual and contextual level factors which are related to students' mobile usage in learning activities. Hence, it is imperative to consider the usage of mobile with digital pedagogy. This study explores individual and contextual predictors of mobile usage among undergraduate students in the stream of engineering. Learning intent is defined as the personal importance that the students ascribe to use mobile for online classes. The participants included are 1004 engineering undergraduates.The regression models has been developed to examine the relationship between mobile usage with respect to new proposed model of Mobile Infographic Pedagogy (MIP).It is observed that the study analysis depicts that the Learner centric is a more significant parameter when mobile infographic pedagogy is utilized. The model reported in this paper can easily be applied by all the faculty members in any institution to help the students improve their attention in the process of teaching-learning.
References
- M.L. Crescente and D. Lee, (2011) Critical issues of mlearning: design models,adoption processes, and future trends., Journal of the Chinese institute of industrial engineers, vol.28, no.2, pp.111-123.
- T. Kim, J.Y. Cho and B.G. Lee, (2013) Evolution to smart learning in public education:A case study,Korean public education. Open and Social Technologies for Networked Learning, vol.395, pp.170-178.
- J. Lee,H.Zo and H. Lee, (2014) Smart learning adoption in employees and HRD managers, British Journal of Educational Technology,vol.45, no.6, pp.1082-1096.
- A. Middleton, ( 2 0 1 5 ) Smart learning:Teaching and learning with smart phones and tablets in post compulsory education, Media-enhanced learning special interest group and Sheffield Hallam University Press.
- T.E. Lias and T. Elias, (2011) Learning analytics :The definitions, the processes, and the potential. [Online]. Available:http://learning analytics.net/Learning Analytics Definitions Processes Potential.pdf.
- G. Hwang, (2014) Definition,frame work and research issues of smart learning environments: A context aware ubiquitous learning perspective,�Smart Learning Environments, vol.1, no.1, pp.1-14.
- Z. T. Zhu, M. H. Yu and P. Riezebos, (2016)A research framework of smart education.,� Smart Learning Environment, vol.3, no.4, p.4.
- R. Huang, J. Yang and Y. Hu, (2012) From digital to smart:The evolution and trends of learning environment,� Open Education Research, vol.1, p.75� 84.
- K.S cott and R. Benlamri, (2010) Context-aware services for smart learning spaces,� Learning Technologies, vol.3, no.3, pp.214-227.
- M. Kearney, S. Schuck, K. Burden and P. Aubusson, (2012) Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective,� Research in Learning Technology, vol.20, p.14406.
- J. Traxler, (2007) Defining, discussing, and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having write...,�International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,vol.8, no.2, p. 1492�3831 ,2007.
- R. J. Kannan, P. Punithavathi and N. Sambandam, (2018) Technology Adoption Models�Adoption of ICT in Educational Institutions in India,� in 2018 World Engineering Education Forum-Global Engineering Deans Council(WEEF- GEDC).
- J. Zhang , (2010) Technology supported learning innovation in cultural context,� Educational Technology Research and Development,vol.58, p.229�243.
- K. Burden and M. Kearney, (2016) Future scenarios for mobile science learning,Research in Science Education, vol.46, no.2, p.287�308.
- M. Kearney, K. Burden and T. Rai, (2015) Investigating teachers adoption of signature pedagogies, Computers & Education, vol.80, p.48�57.
- J. Potts, N. Moore and S. Sukittanon, (2011) Developing mobile learning applications for electrical engineering courses, in 2011. Proceedings of IEEE South east con.
- E. Redondo, D. Fonseca, A. S�nchez and I. Navarro, (2013) New strategies using hand held augmented reality and mobile learning-teaching methodologies, in architecture and building engineering degrees,in Procedia Computer Science.
- Y. Li and L. Wang, (2018) Using iPad-based mobile learning to teach creative engineering within a problem-based learning pedagogy ,Education and Information Technologies, vol.23, no.1, pp.555-568.
- R.K. Mallya and B. Srinivasan, (2019) Impact of Mobile Learning in the Cloud on Learning Competencies of Engineering Students,�International Journal of Online Engineering,vol.15,no.9, pp.80-87.
- A. Peramunugamage, H. Usoof and J. Hapuarachchi,( 2019) Moodle Mobile Plugin for Problem-Based Learning (PBL)in Engineering
- Education,� IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference(EDUCON).
- Radhakrishnan Nair, Radeep Krishna and Ramrao, Nagaraj and Sivapragasam, C and Pothiraj, Sivakumar, (2019) Digital Pedagogy for Skill Development of Engineering Faculty to Solve the Grand Challenges Proceedings of International Conference on Digital Pedagogies (ICDP) 2019, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3377630 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3377630
- Lisa J. Merlo, Amanda M. Stone, Alex Bibbey, (2013) Measuring Problematic Mobile Phone Use: Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the PUMP Scale, Journal of Addiction, vol. 2013, 7.
