Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Year: 2020, Volume: 34, Issue: Special Issue, Pages: 153-158

Original Article

Building Performance and Academic Performance in Higher Education: A Post Occupation Evaluation of Overseas Loan Financing Project

Abstract

Physical infrastructure is one of the input instruments in the implementation and improvement of the quality of education. However, since the government fund is inadequate, so the development financing to improve the physical quality of higher education infrastructure is obtained through overseas loan financing. The problem in this study is to describe the contribution of investment in the provision of facilities and infrastructure on improving the academic and institutional performance of higher education. This study uses a Post Occupational Evaluation method that focuses on measuring building performance and the contribution to higher education academic performance. This study also compares the building performance and academic performance of universities that receive and do not receive loans.

References

  • Anggraeni, S., Maulidina, A., Dewi, M. W., Rahmadianti, S., Rizky, Y. P. C., Arinalhaq, Z. F., and Al-Obaidi, A. S. M. The deployment of drones in sending drugs and patient blood samples COVID-19. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(2), 18-25.
  • Barliana, M. Syaom (2010). Arsitektur, Komunitas, dan Modal Sosial. Bandung: Metatekstur
  • Barret, P., Treves,A., Shmis, T., Ambasz, D., and Ustinova, M. (2019). In the impact of school infrastructure on learning. A Syntesis of the Evidence. Washington DC: The World Bank. DPR RI (2017). Rasio, sarpras dan akreditasi masalah. www.dpr.go.id/berita/detail/id/16774/t/ . Jakarta
  • Dunning, S., and Morrow, D. (2019). What is home performance? Avaliable at http://www.bpsgreenhomes.com/learn/what-is-home-performance
  • Hartman, H., and Mark, L. (2013, February 28). Look and learn. Architects� Journal. Retrieved from http://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/footprint/look-and-learn/8643490.article
  • Heitor, T. (2005). International design principles for schools: potential problems and challenges. OECD Programme on Educational Buildings. [Online]. Available from www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/45/35469220df.
  • Jaunzens, D., M. Hadi, and H. Graves (2001). Encouraging post occupancy evaluation. CRISP consultancy commission 00/12. Environment Division: Building Research Establishment, 2001. www.crispuk.org.uk/REPORTS/0012_fr.pdf, 5 Nov. 2001.
  • Juarti, J., Ery R., Marlailana, M., Elisabeth, R.R., Noorlaelasari, Y. (2015). Penentuan indikator kinerja bangunan gedung pendidikan. Jurnal Fondasi, 4(2), 58-62.
  • Morrell, P. (2015). Collaboration for change: The edge commission on the future of the professionalism. Retrieved from http://www.edgedebate.com/?page_id=2829
  • Okolie, K. C., and Ogunoh, P. E. (2013). Assessment of functional and environmental indicators in the performance of buildings in federal universities of South East Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology Studies, 1(2), 1-11.
  • Palmer, J., Terry, N., and Armitage, P. (2016). Building performance evaluation programme: Findings from nondomestic projects: Getting the best from buildings. Swindon: Innovate UK. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/ 497761/Non-Domestic_Building_performance_full_report_ 2016.pdf
  • Preiser, W. Hardy, H., Andrea, E., Schramm, U. (2018). Building performance evaluation: From delivery process to life cycle phases. Springer International Publishing Rush, Richard D. (Ed), (1986) The Building Systems Integration Handbook, New York, The American Institute of Architects, John Wiley & Sons, 1986.
  • Smith, P.R., and Julian, W.G. (1976), Building Science, London, Applied Science Publishers Limited, 1976.
  • Son, L.H., and Yuen, G. C. S. (1993). Building Maintenance Technology. Basingstoke, United Kingdom, Palgrave MacMillan
  • Ujang, N., Zakariya, K. (2014). The notion of place, place meaning and identity in urban regeneration. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170, 709-717.
  • Vischer, J. C. (2009). Applying knowledge on building performance: From evidence to intelligence. Intelligent Buildings International, 1, 239�248.
  • Warell, A. (2001). Design synthetics: A Functional Approach to Visual Product Form. Chalmers University of Technology. Gothenburg. Theory, Model and Methods. In: Alexander, K. (Eds). Usability of Workplaces. CIB Report, Publications 306. P. 84
  • Watson, J., Clegg, C. W., Cowell, R., and McCarthy, N. (2015). Built for living: Understanding behaviour and the built environment through engineering and design. Retrieved from http://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/built-for-living-understanding-behaviour
  • Werner, S., Schindler, S., Laura, E. (2004). The role of spatial reference frames in architecture misalignment impairs way-finding performance. Environment and Behavior, 36(4), 461-482
  • Widodo, J. (2012). Determinan kinerja akademik penyelenggaraan pendidikan program pascasarjana. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Dinamika Pendidikan, 7(2), 94-101.

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.