Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

DOI: 10.16920/jeet/2017/v30i4/114107

Year: 2017, Volume: 30, Issue: 4, Pages: 58-66

Original Article

A Blueprint for an Ecosystem for Supporting High Quality Education for Engineering

Sohum Sohoni 1*, Scotty D. Craig 2, Krishna Vedula 3
  • The Polytechnic School, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Mesa, Arizona, United States
  • The Polytechnic School, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Mesa, United States
  • Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Massachusetts, United States
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This paper presents the idea and a proposed implementation of a network of Gurukuls or Centers of Excellence for engineering education in India. Facilitated by Indo Universal Collaboration for Engineering Education (IUCEE) in partnership with institutions in India, the IUCEE Gurukuls for Learning and Outcomes Based Education (iGLOBE) program addresses a vital need for institutions to develop self-reliance towards achieving excellence in engineering education. The primary role of the Gurukul in an institution is to provide an ecosystem for faculty development in a manner that will directly contribute to enhance students' learning experience. The mission of the Gurukul is to guide and mentor its faculty in improving their teaching and learning methods, in implementing outcomes based education and in conducting engineering education research.There is a large body of literature available on effective teaching and learning through engineering education conference proceedings and journals, and in wider outlets.However, one of the key observations over the last two decades is that adoption of research based instructional techniques into engineering classrooms is extremely low. We believe that the main reason for such non-adoption is that potential adopters are unable to contextualize the pedagogical research.The paper lays out a vision for a network of discipline-based education researchers to contextualize and coordinate efforts between the Gurukuls and participants/practitioners. The paper considers lessons learned and best practices from efforts in the United States and lays out a blueprint for catalyzing high quality instruction in engineering colleges in India.

References

  • American Society for Engineering Education (2016), Advancing Engineering Education through Virtual Communities of Practice. Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/ASEE-VCPon July 6th 2016

  • Augustine, N. R., Barrett, C., Cassell, G., Grasmick, N., Holliday, C., & Jackson, S. A. (2010). Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: Rapidly approaching category 5. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine.

  • Besterfield Sacre, M., Cox, M. F., Borrego, M., Beddoes, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Changing engineering education: Views of US faculty, chairs, and deans. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 193-219.

  • Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in US engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185-207.

  • California University State System (2016), Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching, Retrieved from http://www.merlot.org/ July 6th 2016.

  • Chi,M. T. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The journal of the learning sciences, 6(3), 271-315.

  • Chi, M. T., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive science, 5(2), 121-152.

  • Clark, R. E., Feldon, D., vanMerri�nboer, J. J.,Yates, K., & Early, S. (2008). Cognitive task analysis. Hand book of research on educational communications and technology, 3, 577-593.

  • Commander,N. E.,& Stanwyck,D. J. (1997). Illusion of knowing in adult readers: Effects of reading skill and passage length. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(1), 39-52.

  • Dancy, M. H., Turpen, C., Henderson, C., (2010, October). Why do faculty try research based instructional strategies?. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1289,No. 1, p. 117).

  • Fairweather, J. (2008). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education.Board of Science Education, National Research Council, The National Academies, Washington, DC.

  • Feser, J., Borrego, M., Pimmel, R., & Della-Piana, C. (2012). Results from a survey of National Science Foundation Transforming Undergraduate Education in STEM (TUES) program reviewers. In ASEE Annual Conference&Exposition, San Antonio,TX.

  • Fry, C. L. (Ed.) (2014). Achieving Systematic Change: A Source Book for Advancing and Funding Undergraduate STEM Education. Washington, D. C.: The Association of American Colleges and Universities. http://www.aacu.org/pkal/sourcebook

  • Glenberg, A. M., Wilkinson, A. C., & Epstein, W. (1982). The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self assessment of comprehension.Memory & Cognition, 10(6), 597-602.

  • Hatano, G. & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.) Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262-272). SanFrancisco: Freeman.

  • Hatano, G., & Inaeaki, K. (1992). Desituating cognition through the construction of conceptual knowledge. In P. Light & G. Butterworth (eds.), Context and cognition (pp.115-133). Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

  • Hatano, G. (2013). Forward. In A. J.Baroody, & A. Dowker (Eds.). The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructive adaptive expertise (pp. xi-xiii).Routledge.

  • Henderson,C.,&Dancy,M.H. (2007).Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020102.

  • Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2008). Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations. American Journal of Physics, 76(1), 7991.

  • Henderson, C., Finkelstein, N., & Beach, A. (2010). Beyond dissemination in college science teaching:An introduction to four core change strategies. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(5), 18�25

  • Jamieson Leah, H. (2012). Innovation with Impact [Electronic resource]: Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education/Leah H. Jamieson and Jack R. Lohmann. Amer. Soc. for Eng. Education (ASEE).�Washington, DC.

  • Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (Eds.). (2014). Cambridge handbook of engineering education research. Cambridge University Press.

  • Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) IEEE Computer Society (2016), Computer Science Curricula 2013, Retrieved from http://www.acm.org/education/CS2013-finalreport.pdf on July 6th 2016.

  • Kimball, D. R., &Holyoak, K. J. (2005). Transfer and Expertise. In E.Tulving&F.Craik (Eds.),TheOxford Handbook of Memory (pp. 109-122).Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality&Social Psychology, 77, 112134.

  • Lattuca, L. R. (2011, February). Influences on engineering faculty members' decisions about educational innovations: A systems view of curricular and instructional change. In Proc. Forum Impact DiffusionTransform.Eng.Educ. Innov.

  • Lohmann, J., & Froyd, F. (2010). Chronological and ontological development of engineering education as a field of scientific inquiry. In Second Meeting of the Committee on the Status, Contributions, and Future Directions of Discipline-Based Education Research, Washington, DC. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13362

  • Madhavan, D (2016, July), 80% Of Engineers Who Graduated From Indian Colleges In 2015 Are Not Employable; Retrieved from http://www.indiatimes.com/news/india/80-ofengineerswho-graduated-from-indian-colleges-in2015-are-not-employable-249796.html on July 6th 2016

  • Matusovich, H. M., Paretti, M. C., McNair, L. D., & Hixson, C. (2014). Faculty Motivation: A Gateway to Transforming Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 302-330.

  • Nanda, A (2016, July), AICTE to cut number of engineering college seats by 600,000; Retrieved from http://www.livemint.com/Politics/BphkOxYuir6OaY cTrBtldJ/AICTE-to-cut-number-of-engineeringcollegeseats-by-600000.html on July 6th 2016

  • NRC (2012). National Research Council, Discipline based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13362

  • Singer, S. R., Nielsen, N. R., & Schweingruber, H.A. (Eds.). (2012). Discipline-based education research: understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. National Academies Press.

  • Sohoni, S. & Craig, S. D. (2016).Making the case for adopting and evaluating innovative pedagogical techniques in engineering classrooms, ASEE Annual Conference and Expo. New Orleans,LA, June 2016

  • STEMEdHub (2016), STEMEdHub: Transforming STEM Education from Innovation to Implementation, Retrieved from https://stemedhub.org/ on July 6th 2016.

  • Turpen, C., Dancy, M., Henderson, C., Singh, C., Sabella, M., & Rebello, S. (2010, October). Faculty perspectives on using peer instruction: A national study. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1289,No. 1, p. 325).

  • U.S. Department of Education (2016), What Works Clearing house, Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/ on July 6th 2016

  • 01 June 2017
  • VIEWS 2215
  • PDF 751

Year: 2017, Volume: 30, Issue: 4


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

More articles

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.